# C'mon Blockbuster, why the charade?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 10, 2005, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106 "2005-01-10T22:08:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2005, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/101 "2005-01-17T00:15:32Z")

</div>

> [@Mauvaise](#):
>
> And, if you say, ‘hey! I don’t this movie’, they’ll even let you return it. All they will do is charge a minimum restocking fee (which is neither unheard or, or unreasonable).

Nobody said it was unheard of or unreasonable. However, it DOES contradict their very firm statements that if I return a movie late, I will not be charged more money for it. That is my understanding of a late fee.

> [@](#):
>
> That’s still not a late fee.

The fact that BB has elected to call it something different doesn’t convince me that it isn’t a late fee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2005, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/102 "2005-01-17T04:17:35Z")

</div>

> [@Mauvaise](#):
>
> How long do you think Blockbuster should let you keep a RENTAL before making one pay a penalty (be it a late fee, or making you buy the damn movie)?

Five days is fine with me. Blockbuster’s nine days is generous.

> [@](#):
>
> Why do you all seem to have a problem with a RENTAL company wanting their property back after the contracted time of rental or being given some sort of compensation if you elect to break the contract?

I don’t personally have a problem with that, and I don’t think anyone else in this thread does either. I only have a problem with them _claiming_ to eliminate late fees while still charging a fee for movies that are returned late.

> [@](#):
>
> But they did elimanate late fees. You have a seven day grace period to return your movie late and you pay nothing beyond the initial rental fee.

Let me address that “grace period”. If you pay for a two-day rental, and they give you an extra seven days after that to return it without paying fees, then you’ve actually paid for a nine-day rental. No matter what they call it, that’s what it boils down to, unless there’s some limit to how often you can take advantage of that “grace period”.

> [@](#):
>
> After that period of time, they sell you the movie. It’s not a late fee - it’s a SALE, a purchase. If it was a late fee, you would not receive goods in exchange for this charge, but you do receive goods - you get the movie.

Yup, makes perfect sense. Netflix used to do the same thing, although you couldn’t return a DVD once they charged you for it. But they didn’t claim they were eliminating late fees; they advertised it as part of their late fee policy.

> [@](#):
>
> If you decide to return your purchase, they charge you a restocking fee to offset their administrative costs. Still, it is NOT a late fee, but again I’ll ask you - how long do you think they should let one keep a movie past the CONTRACTED agreement before seeking compensation of whatever sort?

Your question has been answered. But remember, no matter how often you say “it’s not a late fee”, the fact is they charge a fee for returning a movie Tuesday night that they don’t charge if you return it Monday night. Even if they charge your credit card for the price of the movie on Tuesday morning, and it belongs to you for those few hours on Tuesday (until you give it back and they refund most of the charge), that doesn’t change the fact that when you return it on Tuesday, you pay a fee, just like at every other video store.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mauvaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mauvaise/32/11084_2.png) [@Mauvaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mauvaise)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2005, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/103 "2005-01-17T15:26:21Z")

</div>

Marley and Mr2001 - we’ll just have to agree to disagree. To me a late fee and a restocking fee when returning a purchased product are two entirely different things. To you they are not, and it’s apparent that we will never convince each other differently and it’s a waste of my time to keep repeating the same argument. You go ahead and continue to think that Blockbuster is evil for their revised business plan and I’ll go ahead and think they are chumps for having even a 7-day grace period (as well as being evil for editting movies)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bippy\_the\_Beardless](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ac8455/32.png) [@Bippy\_the\_Beardless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bippy_the_Beardless)\
**Post date:** [January 17, 2005, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/104 "2005-01-17T22:14:03Z")

</div>

So, if blockbusters simply assumed the movie was sold after 9 days charging the purchase price with no option for the new owner to return it after that point, then everyone would be happy with their advertised late fees. But since they have also a buy-back scheme they are suddenly lieing scumbags.

BB will go bust if they don’t learn simple math, or their customers do. You can buy 3 second hand dvds for the price of 2. The cheapest 2nd hand price on the shelves is $4.99. There is a guaranteed minimum price that BB will buy a dvd from you of $5.00. So buy 3\*4.99 dvds =9.98 (two for price of three offer) + TAX  
Sell them back to BB = $15.00 store credit, repeat until you have as much store credit as you want.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/105 "2005-01-18T00:27:40Z")

</div>

> [@Bippy the Beardless](#):
>
> So, if blockbusters simply assumed the movie was sold after 9 days charging the purchase price with no option for the new owner to return it after that point, then everyone would be happy with their advertised late fees. But since they have also a buy-back scheme they are suddenly lieing scumbags.

Nope. I think everyone here would be happy if they just stopped promoting it as “the end of late fees”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chorpler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chorpler/32/2888_2.png) [@chorpler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chorpler)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/106 "2005-01-18T01:36:30Z")

</div>

> [@XJETGIRLX](#):
>
> I seriously doubt he got the letter ‘a few days later’. All the stores I worked at had the same account management policies. Accounts with balances get a phonecall at like a week, two weeks, and then a month overdue. After 45 days they attempt to chargeoff to the cc if there is one on the account. After 60 days they are sent to collections. Any calls or letters before that time would probably have been generated from the store itself. Now, mind you, it’s been a few years since I worked there but I don’t know of any business that would send an account to collections ‘a few days later’.

I got collections notices from the local Blockbuster twice – the first time on the tenth day after renting the movies (I had returned them a couple days late and the late fee was about $14) and the second time on the thirteenth day after renting the movies (the late fee was like $18 that time). It seemed rather hilarious at the time.

Alas, the local Blockbuster went out of business in October (or at least that’s when I noticed their space at the strip mall was empty and had a FOR LEASE sign up), so I can’t run the experiment a third time. Ah well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tellmei_mnotcrazy/32/3419_2.png) [@TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TellMeI_mNotCrazy)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/107 "2005-01-18T02:58:04Z")

</div>

> [@chorpler](#):
>
> I got collections notices from the local Blockbuster twice – the first time on the tenth day after renting the movies (I had returned them a couple days late and the late fee was about $14) and the second time on the thirteenth day after renting the movies (the late fee was like $18 that time). It seemed rather hilarious at the time.

There’s a difference between getting the postcards that Blockbuster sends out to remind you of late fees, and actually being sent to a collection agency. I’ve gotten a couple postcards from them in the past, asking me to please come in and pay my late fees - which I did - and not one of them came from a collection agency.

(Incidentally, I just got a thing from BB in the mail, waiving up to $25.00 in late fees from 2004.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chorpler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chorpler/32/2888_2.png) [@chorpler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chorpler)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/108 "2005-01-18T06:28:06Z")

</div>

> [@TellMeI'mNotCrazy](#):
>
> There’s a difference between getting the postcards that Blockbuster sends out to remind you of late fees, and actually being sent to a collection agency.

Indeed, there is. The two that I refer to above were from … let me see … ah, here’s the first one. “Credit Collection Services” in Newton, Massachusetts. It has a few paragraphs of United States Code quoted, and says “This is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. This communication was sent by a debt collector.” on it. The second one was from the same people.

And again, this was not even two weeks after I had originally _rented_ the movies. And it wasn’t like I had a history of delinquency or a huge account balance or something – we’re talking $14 and $18. Of course, the same store also had one of my brother’s friends arrested after his car was stolen with two of their movies inside, so none of it surprises me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 7:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/109 "2005-01-18T07:14:55Z")

</div>

> [@Mauvaise](#):
>
> To me a late fee and a restocking fee when returning a purchased product are two entirely different things.

I might agree if we were talking about a voluntary purchase.

> [@](#):
>
> You go ahead and continue to think that Blockbuster is evil for their revised business plan

Can you even fucking read?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tellmei_mnotcrazy/32/3419_2.png) [@TellMeI\_mNotCrazy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TellMeI_mNotCrazy)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 12:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/110 "2005-01-18T12:56:03Z")

</div>

> [@chorpler](#):
>
> Indeed, there is. The two that I refer to above were from … let me see … ah, here’s the first one. “Credit Collection Services” in Newton, Massachusetts. It has a few paragraphs of United States Code quoted, and says “This is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. This communication was sent by a debt collector.” on it. The second one was from the same people.
> 
> And again, this was not even two weeks after I had originally _rented_ the movies. And it wasn’t like I had a history of delinquency or a huge account balance or something – we’re talking $14 and $18. Of course, the same store also had one of my brother’s friends arrested after his car was stolen with two of their movies inside, so none of it surprises me.

Wow. Just wow. I apologize for questioning you - that’s astounding. No wonder they’re no longer in business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mauvaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mauvaise/32/11084_2.png) [@Mauvaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mauvaise)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2005, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/111 "2005-01-18T13:10:28Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> Can you even fucking read?

Quite well - can you even fucking understand the use of hyperbole to illustrate one’s point?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2005, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/112 "2005-01-19T00:14:25Z")

</div>

> [@Mauvaise](#):
>
> Quite well - can you even fucking understand the use of hyperbole to illustrate one’s point?

Hyperbole is when you exaggerate an accurate observation to make your point more obvious. It’s not hyperbole if there’s no grain of truth at the center. No one is complaining about Blockbuster’s new policy - only the way it’s being marketed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Musicat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/musicat/32/20189_2.png) [@Musicat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Musicat)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2005, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106/113 "2005-02-20T15:29:24Z")

</div>

In light of [today’s news,](http://www.capitalnews9.com/content/headlines/?ArID=118497&SecID=33) it seems appropriate to bump this thread.

> [@](#):
>
> New Jersey regulators are taking a look at the fine print on the video rental chain’s rules.
> 
> They’ve filed a lawsuit against Blockbuster, charging that the company failed to tell customers the real deal. The regulators said that many don’t know that overdue rentals are converted to a sale after the due date.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cmon-blockbuster-why-the-charade/284106.md?page=5)
