Winston Smith: your ideas are fucking retarded.
I’ll offer you 8 to 1 odds on a $100 bet that Obama doesn’t attack Iran within the next year. If I win, you give me $100. If you win, I give you $800. If you don’t take the bet, you’re a coward.
Winston, it’s true that the type of “reporting” you’re railing against is a real problem. You just chose a bad example to illustrate your ire.
I might consider taking that bet if “attack” includes a small scale bombing campaign- say, a single airstrike.
Sure, any intentional, overt attack on Iran by the US.
That would exclude things like this that were apparently accidental; or covert things where responsibility is a matter of speculation, not fact.
Since when does IKEA go around reporting on Iran? Shouldn’t they be making cheap furniture or something?
If Ikea sold Iran its first nuclear weapon, they would never be able to assemble it.
Your angry words give me diarrhea. Please go away.
Ok. I can live with that.
They would have to table the entire plan?
See, that’s where you’re wrong. It’s obvious that Obama is now taking political advice from:
Sarah Palin! :eek:
Well, they’d have to clear it with the Chair, first.
Umm, just where do you think they’ll be aiming those laser beam eyes?
[Okay, but AFTER Israel, they might aim at you…]
Look:
a) Does anyone here trust Iran with giant robots?
b) Does anyone here believe Iran when they say that giant robots are “a fiction” that is “absurdly cliche”?
c) Are you willing to bet that Iran will use their giant robots merely to build mini-malls?
d) Do you believe them when they say that they’re at least a decade away from functioning laser beam eyes?
e) Have they promised you your very own giant robot to heat your pool?
If you answered “No” to two or more of the above questions, you’ll want to keep paying attention to serious news sources (as opposed to The Pit).
There had to be some cause for the crap you’re spewing.
Sorry, everyone.