# Co-owners of house one dies. Stepped up basis?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [September 25, 2020, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506 "2020-09-25T13:40:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/1 "2020-09-25T13:40:57Z")

</div>

I need some creative thinking here since a few lawyers cannot come up with an acceptable solution. Let me explain. 2 married couples own a home purchased for 20k. Now worth 2 million. One couple dies (soon not yet we know which one from cancer). Their son A gets the stepped up basis and avoids capital gains tax. But how? So far we have 2 bad outcomes to choose from. Either keep the house for decades paying property tax and maintenance. It’s too old to rent out. Or sell it immediately. Then daughter B (her parents) will owe hundreds of thousands to the IRA. We need a better solution. Up until now everyone is very friendly unless forced into one of those scenarios. How can we avoid all the capital gains tax on half the house? And still get the cash from other half? By working together?

Ideas please. Of course you’re not a lawyer and neither am I just want a possible direction to consider. Probably involving trusts and expensive lawyers and documents I can accept that…

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/2 "2020-09-25T15:31:19Z")

</div>

The simplest and cheapest solutions are usually the best. I’d avoid lawyers and conflict and sell the house. Split the money gained equitably, and part ways.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/3 "2020-09-25T15:55:09Z")

</div>

You think A should pay for half of B’s capital gains tax? Does that seem fair to you? Anyone else?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/4 "2020-09-25T15:57:00Z")

</div>

IRS oops

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/5 "2020-09-25T16:04:42Z")

</div>

The alternative is that A should pay for maintenance and property tax on a property he gains no benefit from for decades only to save B some taxes.

I assume B can’t buy out A’s share?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/6 "2020-09-25T16:06:26Z")

</div>

> [@sbright33](#):
>
> You think A should pay for half of B’s capital gains tax? Does that seem fair to you? Anyone else?

I don’t see why that is necessary. House sells, say for $2,000,000. Each gets $1,000,000. One person has to pay some out in the form of capital gains tax. The other does not. That seems fair to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/7 "2020-09-25T16:07:23Z")

</div>

A can at any time file a partition lawsuit to force a sale, right? I mean either partner could but A is the one who would benefit from doing that.

So understand that A can at any time unilaterally decide that a sale is happening, B’s future capital gains not withstanding. Anything A does for B is above and beyond what A owes B in any way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/8 "2020-09-25T16:09:20Z")

</div>

Also IANAL but can’t B’s parents just reinvest the money in a new home to avoid paying capital gains? Or depending on the state if this was their primary residence they wouldn’t pay anyways.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/9 "2020-09-25T16:12:17Z")

</div>

On what basis is the house co-owned? Is it tenants in common or something else?

Also I wonder if anyone has considered consulting the IRS, either directly or through a third party?

Also, there is a kind of person called IRS Enrolled Agent, they don’t work for the IRS but they have some kind of special qualifications to deal with them; I had to use one once with a very good outcome, you could hire one to work on behalf of all the owners to straighten this out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/10 "2020-09-25T16:23:21Z")

</div>

> [@sbright33](#):
>
> One couple dies (soon not yet we know which one from cancer).

BTW, what does this mean? Are you saying the first couple is not yet dead? In that case, no one is getting a stepped-up basis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/11 "2020-09-25T17:07:36Z")

</div>

What is your role in this scenario? Because it sounds to me like they’re talking about selling the house, but the son of the first couple is saying, “Let’s wait until my parents are dead, so I will have lower taxes” and the second couple or their daughter says, “Well, if we do that, then you should pay half of the capital gains tax we will owe.” Is that interpretation correct?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/12 "2020-09-25T17:21:02Z")

</div>

No. They will soon die. We will wait until then or decades longer until the other couple is gone. Trying to plan ahead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/13 "2020-09-25T17:25:52Z")

</div>

Reoderick, TIC. The irs does not always try so hard to find a better solution with they taxpayer in mind?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/14 "2020-09-25T17:26:11Z")

</div>

If the other couple is still living there wouldn’t the fairest thing be for them to pay the son something for living in a home that’s half his?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/15 "2020-09-25T17:27:54Z")

</div>

Well, if they’re quibbling over this now, then just sell while both couples are still alive and everyone loses the same amount to taxes.

If it were up to me, I’d say wait until the first couple is dead and then both parties contribute an amount equal to the capital gains due. Each party pays half the tax bill that only one party owes while the other half of the money goes to some charitable endeavor (Habitat for Humanity, for example) with each party receiving an equal charitable deduction.

However this is settled, both parties end up with more money than most people see in a lifetime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/16 "2020-09-25T17:28:15Z")

</div>

Pay him for he trouble of living there? He would live there for free if given the chance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/17 "2020-09-25T17:34:50Z")

</div>

Something to factor in here is that Biden’s tax plan includes abolition of the step-up in basis upon inheritance. (An extremely good idea, since this is a ridiculous tax loophole.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/18 "2020-09-25T17:50:45Z")

</div>

Riemann great point. How soon could this happen?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbright33](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8e8cbc/32.png) [@sbright33](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbright33)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/19 "2020-09-25T17:54:57Z")

</div>

Babale great idea to buy a smaller home to avoid taxes. Is there any catch or requirements in advance for this to work?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2020, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506/20 "2020-09-25T18:01:11Z")

</div>

> [@sbright33](#):
>
> Riemann great point. How soon could this happen?

Changes in tax law are not usually retrospective. I’m not sure, but I think changes that occur in 2021 could apply to tax year 2021 without violating that principle.

Does anyone know what the precedent is on this? If an administration passes changes in tax law mid-2021, would it be unusual for that change to apply to tax year 2021, i.e. from January 2021?

My _guess_ is that the earliest it would apply would probably be from January 2022, but I’m really not sure.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/co-owners-of-house-one-dies-stepped-up-basis/921506.md?page=2)
