It’s also nice, Colibri, to see your consistency on this.
Here’s a post you made a bit earlier today:
So, another mod had explicitly ordered people to keep political shots out of GQ, and 50 minutes after that order, a poster took a political shot in direct response to the post that received the admonition.
And in that case, it was “No warning issued” from you.
Were you in a better mood at that time? Had you just had lunch? Maybe a beer? Was there something else that distinguished these basically identical cases, and justified a warning for one poster and no warning for the other?