BTW, what did you think of the three short prequels: 1962: Prop Joe, 1985: Omar, and 2000: Bunk/McNulty? According to The Hollywood Reporter, they were produced by David Simon himself, and there will be more as S5 progresses.
Frankly, I was disappointed and don’t think they live up to the standards of The Wire. It’s as though they found some young film students, showed them a few episodes, and told them to write and produce the clips. They just don’t seem to fit organically into the world of The Wire.
The first two in particular feel unsubtle and amateurish. The young Prop Joe is preternaturally clever and eloquent, and overuses the word “proposition.” IMHO the idea of a 1962 grade school kid trying to shake down a teacher for money is completely implausible. He might have offered to rat out his paying client to gain favor or get out of trouble, but demanding cash rings completely false to me.
Also, the amounts he’s asking for are completely out of line. In 1962 my father, a middle-class white man (working for the Baltimore Sun, BTW), earned about $100 a week, on which he supported a family of four. Prop Joe asking another inner city school kid for $10 is ludicrous. Ten cents would have been more likely.
I will say that the production design for this clip, particularly the costumes and the teacher’s hairstyle, is good.
The Omar piece is not much better. The acting by the kids is not great, and I wouldn’t expect Omar to have earned his scar by that age. (You may not be able to see it on the computer, but you can if you watch it On Demand.) The whole notion of “here’s how Omar developed his code” was handled rather clumsily, I felt.
The Bunk/McNulty piece was not as bad as the first two, largely because the acting was better. But even so, there were false notes. Jimmy drinking through his first night in a new posting? Sorry, I don’t buy it. He drinks and doesn’t suck up to the bosses, but he’s not a complete political idiot, either.
What did you think?