# Comic fans: what's the deal with John Byrne?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [March 12, 2003, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911 "2003-03-12T19:37:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 2:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/21 "2003-03-13T02:34:12Z")

</div>

erm…

having read the entire article, I disagree with him on a whole raft of things.

But he’s _still_ absoutely correct about Byrne’s West Coast Avengers run.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terrifel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c68b51/32.png) [@Terrifel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terrifel)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/22 "2003-03-13T02:42:18Z")

</div>

John Byrne has always had a knack for finding startling twists and unexpected hooks to base his stories around. However, many of these story ideas seem to be necessary or appropriate only in the mind of John Byrne. Probably the most egregious example was his decision to have Superman kill people in-continuity. I remember picking up that issue, seeing Superman holding that box of Kryptonite out and declaring solemnly, “_You’re responsible for the deaths of a billion people…and for that you must **die!** _” I’ve always sort of suspected that this was Byrne’s nasty response to all the whimsically misleading Superman covers of the Silver age; You know the ones, where Superman is shown blowing up the Earth or turning Jimmy Olsen into a cactus or something, and in the story it turns out it was all a ruse to fool Lois. Here, Superman is shown as an executioner on the cover, and lo and behold, he actually, seriously kills people in the book. I have to say I never saw _that_ one coming; one has to admit, it’s one hell of a plot twist.

Later Byrne reboots just got weirder, as best exemplified in his _Chapter One_ contributions to Marvel. In addition to the whole Igor/Skrull deal from **Hulk** noted above, Byrne also felt it necessary to amend the concept of the “Gamma Bomb,” which in the Byrniverse is actually a laser of some kind. the Spider-man update was just as odd, as Byrne seemed to think that the notion of the robber traveling all the way across town to kill Uncle Ben after Peter let him escape was just way too improbable, so he created this elaborate backstory to justify the event. I’d tell you what it was, but while reading the comic I suffered a mild cerebral accident which erased the memory.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 3:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/23 "2003-03-13T03:21:22Z")

</div>

Ooh! OOH! I didn’t! I remember!

Byrne had Uncle Ben (who was poor, remember\*) buying Peter a computer ('cause no-one uses a microsope anymore: microscopes are for LuSeR-FaNbOy-GeEkz!) so that Peter could surf the internet\* with all his 311+ haXXXor d00dz. As he was coming out of the store, the thief bumped into Ben intentionally to see the address on the computer box so that he could later go rob the place. Later the thief met the proto-Spider-Man and, while on the lam from his robbery of the wrestling folks, the thief decided to go rob Ben’s house. This was because Byrne thought two coincidences (peter meets the theif, the thief stumbles into Peter’s house) was too stupid. So he changed it so there were only two coincidences (Ben meets the thief, the thief bumps into Peter as he’s robbing the wrestlers), so you can see how he vastly improved the story flow.

And his fix of Spider-Man’s origin was good too: He changed it from a small, unobtrusive bite from a radioactive spider to the spiderbite augmented by a thermonuclear explosion in downtown Manhattan and Peter being the only survior (except Doc Ock) out of thousands of people there for the demonstration.

Much improved again.

Fenris  
\*Remember Marvel’s/Byrne’s “10 year” rule. Every origin happend 10 years ago from whatever issue is current at the time. So when Byrne’s “Year One” came out, 10 years ago was, say, 1988. Um…Yeah, I know the internet existed back then, but it was much more BBSs and stuff and a computer was _expensive_: we’re talking 3-4K for a good one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Interrobang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/interrobang/32/17463_2.png) [@Interrobang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Interrobang)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 3:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/24 "2003-03-13T03:47:08Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> It’s not so much the lack of continuity, it’s the obnoxious disregard for other creator’s work.

Those examples do suck. I just want to clarify that I’m not intending to slam continuity – I think it’s essential, and I’m basically in agreement with you about what sort of stuff should be paid attention to and what sort of stuff can slide. (These days, I’m most familiar with continuity issues on _Buffy_, and boy can those arguments get heated…)

> [@](#):
>
> (See Alan Moore’s utterly brilliant series SUPREME, the first half of which was released as a trade paperback a few weeks ago).

And I just got this from the library last night. (I’m grateful to the Seattle Public Library these days for starting to stock up on comic collections – I also picked up the “Tower of Babel” JLA collection, which I’m halfway through.) Anyway, just issue #1 of _Supreme_ is brilliant. I’m looking forward to the rest of it.

> [@](#):
>
> You think Superman’s better now?

Just to clarify again – I haven’t read (much) Superman, so I have no opinion about the reboot’s quality.

Anyway, I do realize that it’s the _extent_ and _suddenness_ of Byrne’s changes that seem to be the real problem. And again, it seems like he used to be better – Frankie Raye’s decision to become Nova, for example, was well foreshadowed. And Alicia and Johnny’s relationship developed nicely, as well.

Ah, well. Was Puck’s bizarre origin story a Byrne thing, or was that whoever came after him on _Alpha Flight_?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Santos\_L\_Halper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/santos_l_halper/32/1_2.png) [@Santos\_L\_Halper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Santos_L_Halper)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 6:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/25 "2003-03-13T06:57:22Z")

</div>

Boy, it shows how long it’s been since I followed comics: 23 posts discussing John Byrne, and not one single mention of his run on X-Men?! One of the high points of modern superhero comics, for gosh’s sake! (this was back when Marvel put out only one or two mutant comics a month - later to balloon to roughly 75 different mutant titles…).

I also loved his run on FF, and his brief stint on Captain America. In those days Byrne was pretty much the comic god. I had pretty much drifted away from comic-dom by the time he was re-vamping Superman.

Eric

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 11:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/26 "2003-03-13T11:39:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Interrobang!? \*  
> \*\*And I just got this [The Supreme Trade Paperback] from the library last night. (I’m grateful to the Seattle Public Library these days for starting to stock up on comic collections – I also picked up the “Tower of Babel” JLA collection, which I’m halfway through.) Anyway, just issue #1 of _Supreme_ is brilliant. I’m looking forward to the rest of it.

\*\*  
It just gets better and better after the first issue! This is the first half of Moore’s Supreme series, the other half is in a TP to be released in a few months. That’ll just leave one miniseries that ties in that apparently _won’t_ be reprinted. If you care, the titles (each issue has a different title :rolleyes: )

Judgment Day: Alpha  
Judgment Day: Omega  
Judgment Day: Final Judgment  
Judgment Day: Aftermath

It’s Alan Moore showing DC how to do The Crisis correctly using the hopelessly screwed up Leifieldverse (Supreme, Youngblood, etc) as an object lesson. Waaaaay cool stuff!  
\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> Ah, well. Was Puck’s bizarre origin story a Byrne thing, or was that whoever came after him on _Alpha Flight_? \*\*

I’m pretty sure it was post-Byrne.

Fenris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 11:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/27 "2003-03-13T11:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Fenris \*  
> \*\*By the way, I just found someone who nicely articluates what I don’t like about Byrne’s modern stuff. (I was trying to find a cite for the “brie-eating yuppie” quote that Byrne made when discussing his verison of Superman.[see here](http://javapadawan.com/calliope/mv17.html).
> 
> Note that I strongly disagree with his take on Byrne’s FF and other stuff. But he’s dead on the mark regarding the Vision, Sub Mariner, Scarlet Witch, the Original Human Torch, etc. \*\*

I also disagreed with the author’s characterization of Wolverine as a murderous butcher and his dislike of the story in Kingdom Come.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ResIpsaLoquitor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b3f665/32.png) [@ResIpsaLoquitor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ResIpsaLoquitor)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/28 "2003-03-13T15:45:42Z")

</div>

Hmmm–I also really like the author’s commentary on the Vision/Scarlet Witch stuff. It brings to mind the fact that Byrne is what I’d best describe as an evangelical athiest–I’ve seen him publically insult religious believers in AOL chats. His effort to make the Vision “soulless,” I suspect, wasn’t just to overturn continuity, but also to push his athiest agenda.

(Although note here that I don’t intend to pick on athiests. It’s been my experience, though, that Byrne suffers from the same problems as Jehovah’s Witnesses who refuse to leave one’s doorstep.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/29 "2003-03-13T16:19:37Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by ResIpsaLoquitor \*  
> \*\*Hmmm–I also really like the author’s commentary on the Vision/Scarlet Witch stuff. It brings to mind the fact that Byrne is what I’d best describe as an evangelical athiest–I’ve seen him publically insult religious believers in AOL chats. His effort to make the Vision “soulless,” I suspect, wasn’t just to overturn continuity, but also to push his athiest agenda.
> 
> (Although note here that I don’t intend to pick on athiests. It’s been my experience, though, that Byrne suffers from the same problems as Jehovah’s Witnesses who refuse to leave one’s doorstep.) \*\*

I hate to nitpick spelling, but the word is “atheist.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Straight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dec6dc/32.png) [@Enola\_Straight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Straight)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/30 "2003-03-13T16:33:57Z")

</div>

Did’t he start a comic of his own creation NEXT MEN which ended up going nowhere?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/31 "2003-03-13T17:19:14Z")

</div>

Not to hijack, but please, allow me to hijack. Who was the writer on Batman and the Outsiders who, when confronted with an issue of Brave and Bold which proved that Metamorpho knew Batman’s secret identity, declared the issue to be non-continuity and triggered a firestorm? Sounds like (to drag this kicking and screaming back on topic) he and Byrne have a lot in common.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmkeller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmkeller/32/118_2.png) [@cmkeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmkeller)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/32 "2003-03-13T18:07:50Z")

</div>

Otto:

> [@](#):
>
> Who was the writer on Batman and the Outsiders who, when confronted with an issue of Brave and Bold which proved that Metamorpho knew Batman’s secret identity, declared the issue to be non-continuity and triggered a firestorm?

I don’t remember the specific issue, but the only writer I ever remember working on Batman and the Outsiders is Mike W. Barr.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/33 "2003-03-13T21:30:32Z")

</div>

To say something nice about John Byrne, The Ego Who Draws, I believe he’s a staunch arch-foe of Rob Liefeld.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shy\_guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a6a055/32.png) [@shy\_guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shy_guy)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/34 "2003-03-13T21:33:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Did’t he start a comic of his own creation NEXT MEN which ended up going nowhere?

There’s a funny part in the Savage Dragon/Megaton Man crossover from the early days of Image where they team up to fight Johnny Redbeard’s Nixed Men. All the members give little recaps of their origins. Fun issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ResIpsaLoquitor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b3f665/32.png) [@ResIpsaLoquitor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ResIpsaLoquitor)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/35 "2003-03-13T22:16:40Z")

</div>

Reminds me of Byrne’s DC series from last year–“Lab Rats.” Yeesh, I could barely remember the name.

Which illustrates another problem: Byrne’s lost all sense of how to portray young people. His modern-age Wonder Girl was particularly horrendous–I was still in high school when that run started, and I can say with all certainty that no teenage girl I knew acted like that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2003, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/36 "2003-03-13T22:47:49Z")

</div>

Not even the ones with super powers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2003, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/37 "2003-03-14T01:39:10Z")

</div>

Two comments:

1. The “Metamorpho doesn’t know Batman’s ID” thing IIRC _was_ Barr and he was probably right. (I’m not positive it was Metamorpho…but _some_one didn’t know Bat’s ID). There was one issue of Brave and Bold that was waaaaaaaaaaay out of continuity and the author tossed that one issue out. I don’t remember the details but trust me: that Brave and Bold issue had to take place on Earth B.

Denny O’Neil’s later edict that _no-one_ knew Dick Grayon was Robin (including any of the Titans), however, was fucktarded.

1. Next Men was actually pretty damned good when read as a lump.

Fenris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aslan\_of\_Narnia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecd19e/32.png) [@Aslan\_of\_Narnia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aslan_of_Narnia)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2003, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/38 "2003-03-14T01:45:51Z")

</div>

Perhaps it’s because he’s a revionist who likes to screw around with other people’s characters and frankly does a bad job of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aslan\_of\_Narnia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecd19e/32.png) [@Aslan\_of\_Narnia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aslan_of_Narnia)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2003, 1:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/39 "2003-03-14T01:47:30Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Intaglio \*  
> \*\*He pretty much ruined Wonder Woman Comic by rewriting/screwing up her story. \*\*

Am I the only one thinking that her actually being a statue is incredibly stupid?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2003, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911/40 "2003-03-14T13:21:48Z")

</div>

Her creator, William Marston didn’t, since that’s the only origin she’s had\* since she first appeared in the '40s.

Fenris

\*With one exception, which is in the “Mopee” category of retcon (it was agreed that everyone would ignore it and pretend it never happened right after it came out). Wonder Woman #105 had Mommy Hippolyta and Daddy Someone or other have L’il Diana as a baby. For unexplained reasons, all the gods and goddessess showed up and gave baby Diana powers. Then Daddy and all the Amazon men in the kingdom were wiped out in some wars and the Amazon women leave to go to Paradise Island with L’il Diana. :yuk:

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comic-fans-whats-the-deal-with-john-byrne/160911.md?page=3)
