# Comment thread for Lawfare?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144
**Category:** About This Message Board
**Created:** [December 14, 2018, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144 "2018-12-14T22:51:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 13
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/1 "2018-12-14T22:51:41Z")

</div>

The website, [Lawfare](https://www.lawfareblog.com/), has many strong articles+podcasts on law, domestic, and foreign policy by people who know their stuff.

However, they lack anything like a comments system. There’s no good forum, at the moment, to discuss their content.

Would the Powers that Be have any complaint with me starting a GD thread where people could talk about the newest articles?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/2 "2018-12-14T23:08:29Z")

</div>

Go for it. Include a link and observe fair use please. It should be framed in the form of debate, but that can be done fairly easily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/3 "2018-12-14T23:08:55Z")

</div>

nm. Bone got there first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/4 "2018-12-14T23:19:34Z")

</div>

I think **Sage Rat** meant an omnibus thread for on-going discussion of articles there, tho. Like, if I want to talk about “Judicial Attire and how it relates to Justice”, I could post in this thread but when **Sage Rat** spots a new article about “Scale Economies of Justice”, he would just post in the same Lawfare discussion thread, not start a whole new thread. I might be wrong, but that is how I read his OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/5 "2018-12-14T23:36:12Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> I think **Sage Rat** meant an omnibus thread for on-going discussion of articles there, tho. Like, if I want to talk about “Judicial Attire and how it relates to Justice”, I could post in this thread but when **Sage Rat** spots a new article about “Scale Economies of Justice”, he would just post in the same Lawfare discussion thread, not start a whole new thread. I might be wrong, but that is how I read his OP.

I think that’s be fine too. Just link to the newest article. Just like when we have omnibus threads on a whole season of a TV show.

If he wants to link it in GD, then there needs to be a debate component. Otherwise IMHO would work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/6 "2018-12-14T23:47:12Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> If he wants to link it in GD, then there needs to be a debate component. Otherwise IMHO would work.

Aye; I just pointed it out because I’m not sure how there could be an omnibus thread that was a debate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2018, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/7 "2018-12-14T23:48:25Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Aye; I just pointed it out because I’m not sure how there could be an omnibus thread that was a debate.

It could, by starting a new relevant issue with each new article/link. And some themes could stretch across articles as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/8 "2018-12-15T00:02:28Z")

</div>

An omnibus comment thread wouldn’t really fit in debate. IMHO is better for that.

But we’ve had debate type series before, where some umbrella of topic creation exists and a thread is opened to debate/discuss/argue each. That’s totally fine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/9 "2018-12-15T00:06:24Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> It could, by starting a new relevant issue with each new article/link. And some themes could stretch across articles as well.

How about I start it in GD and in the OP I’ll say that people should only bring up a new article if they have a point to debate? E.g.: Everyone’s aware of where the articles are and how to read them. There’s no value in linking over to the other site simply because a new article is up, you need to have some potentially controversial reason to introduce it as a new topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/10 "2018-12-15T00:08:07Z")

</div>

If you think there could be enough traffic for a forum I’d give 'em one.

The more the merrier, especially when it comes to traffic.

Jenny  
your humble TubaDiva  
Administrator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/11 "2018-12-15T00:17:50Z")

</div>

> [@TubaDiva](#):
>
> If you think there could be enough traffic for a forum I’d give 'em one.
> 
> The more the merrier, especially when it comes to traffic.
> 
> Jenny  
> your humble TubaDiva  
> Administrator

I don’t have any affiliation with their site, so unless people find us and start to post, I imagine that it would just be the normal subset of GD/Elections posters. Obviously, we can hope that we become the official unofficial commentary location. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/12 "2018-12-15T00:33:41Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> How about I start it in GD and in the OP I’ll say that people should only bring up a new article if they have a point to debate? E.g.: Everyone’s aware of where the articles are and how to read them. There’s no value in linking over to the other site simply because a new article is up, you need to have some potentially controversial reason to introduce it as a new topic.

The link would be useful in case of the users here want to see what everyone is chatting about. Unless it’s private or something?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)
#### Post date: [December 15, 2018, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/comment-thread-for-lawfare/826144/13 "2018-12-15T00:39:21Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> The link would be useful in case of the users here want to see what everyone is chatting about. Unless it’s private or something?

I meant that people shouldn’t link gratuitously.

[https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=21378775](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=21378775)
