No, the humans haven’t changed in this future. They have options on how they behave, and being the ultimate adaptable species, I guess I have faith.
But we’re human too, so it’s easiest to start by thinking about how that future might go wrong, than decide how to get there.
I only expect a bit of group back-and-forth on Task(1), say corruption, or personalty clash; we all know the weaknesses, but seeing them in a different light where there is a different, maybe more valuable status quo to defend.
Task(2) is then hard bit, how to get from here to there, but we now have a list of human political ‘defects’ to counteract and maybe a priority order to tackle them.
Well, for a starter, I’d say that assuming the CSC was atready set up and running, people’s behaviour would already be slightly different. But, I’d claim, it’s human nature to try to make rivals seem ‘different’ or ‘other’, and that conflict would split the nice CSC right apart. Wouldn’t it?
Can you give some examples of current political issues that can be solved with “common sense,” and what that would look like? What’s the “common sense” solution to the abortion debate?
Is the above an actual example of the responses you are looking for?
As the OP makes no sense, never mind CommonSense, I am closing this thread.
If you want to try this again, please do a much better job explaining what you’re looing to talk about here.