# Complete Cecil Column Reprinted

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [March 13, 2011, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593 "2011-03-13T23:01:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2011, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/1 "2011-03-13T23:01:48Z")

</div>

I was following links – no, really, I clicked on a link in a thread here and it was linked on that page, honest – and I found this female sexuality site. An article on [female ejaculate](http://dodsonandross.com/blogs/betty-dodson/2011/03/very-latest-g-spot-female-ejaculate) quotes Cecil’s entire column [What’s in female ejaculate?](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2420/whats-in-female-ejaculate) from October 25, 2002.

It seems to be a major legit site and they should know better. Somehow calling an eight-year-old column the “very latest” information makes it even worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2011, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/2 "2011-03-13T23:05:49Z")

</div>

She cites “Cecil” as the author at the end of the blog post and says some very complimentary things about him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Una\_Persson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/una_persson/32/346_2.png) [@Una\_Persson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Una_Persson)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/3 "2011-03-14T00:39:56Z")

</div>

I’ve sent an alert out, thank you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/4 "2011-03-14T02:41:35Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> She cites “Cecil” as the author at the end of the blog post and says some very complimentary things about him.

So what? Are you honestly of the opinion that you can commit copyright theft if only you praise what you steal?

Most people who steal like what’s being stolen. Do you think they start off by saying “Hey, everybody, I really, really hate this piece. I’m going to reprint here in its entirety.”?

It’s copyright infringement. Naming the original author doesn’t change the legal status by an iota. Legally it’s theft. Not some fake variation that isn’t really theft because it’s words. Theft. Stolen property. It’s wrong. It’s to be condemned and reported. And then taken down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 2:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/5 "2011-03-14T02:46:20Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> So what? Are you honestly of the opinion that you can commit copyright theft if only you praise what you steal?
> 
> Most people who steal like what’s being stolen. Do you think they start off by saying “Hey, everybody, I really, really hate this piece. I’m going to reprint here in its entirety.”?
> 
> It’s copyright infringement. Naming the original author doesn’t change the legal status by an iota. Legally it’s theft. Not some fake variation that isn’t really theft because it’s words. Theft. Stolen property. It’s wrong. It’s to be condemned and reported. And then taken down.

Jeez. Calm down. I was just pointing out that she gave it proper attribution and she isn’t making any money off of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 2:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/6 "2011-03-14T02:51:34Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> Jeez. Calm down. I was just pointing out that she gave it proper attribution and she isn’t making any money off of it.

The proper way to do it( as pointed out here by the mods), is to quote a small portion(fair use) and link to the full article unless you get permission to reprint the whole thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darth\_Nader](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Darth\_Nader](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darth_Nader)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/7 "2011-03-14T17:24:31Z")

</div>

At least it wasn’t a recipe for apple pie!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 5:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/8 "2011-03-14T17:38:43Z")

</div>

> [@Darth\_Nader](#):
>
> At least it wasn’t a recipe for apple pie!

At least she didn’t ‘improve’ it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kamino\_Neko](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kamino_neko/32/34_2.png) [@Kamino\_Neko](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kamino_Neko)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/9 "2011-03-14T21:17:08Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> Jeez. Calm down. I was just pointing out that she gave it proper attribution and she isn’t making any money off of it.

The Straight Dope isn’t printed under a [Creative Commons licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/), so that is not enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2011, 10:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/complete-cecil-column-reprinted/574593/10 "2011-03-14T22:21:46Z")

</div>

> [@Tengu](#):
>
> The Straight Dope isn’t printed under a [Creative Commons licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/), so that is not enough.

I get it. However there is a huge difference between claiming the work as your own and/or selling it for profit and not following proper copyright procedure. It’s a copyright violation but hardly theft.
