# Conciousness

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [June 17, 1999, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110 "1999-06-17T18:33:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 1999, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/1 "1999-06-17T18:33:00Z")

</div>

I’m afraid this column completely misses the boat. Thinking is not conciousness. Conciousness is an awareness. For example, a sleepwalking person may may hold a conversation with you, or may perform other tasks which clearly require thinking, but they are not concious, that is, they are not aware of what they are doing. Intelligence tests - whether Turing tests, SATs, or whatever other mental challenges you devise - do nothing to test awareness; you can build an arbitrarily complicated machine which is in all measurable ways smarter than humans, one which positively drips with the Essence of Thought, but you still don’t know if it is concious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 1999, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/2 "1999-06-17T18:45:00Z")

</div>

Yeah, you know YOU’RE conscious, but what about the schlub in the next cubicle? If you ask certain questions, and get certain answers, you may reasonbly conclude that he’s consciuous, but he might not think so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 1999, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/3 "1999-06-17T19:36:00Z")

</div>

:: singing ::: give a little whistle (wheet-wheet), give a little whistle (wheet-whoot), and always let your conscious be your guide  
Yes, yes, I know, it’s a pun, a play on words.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 1999, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/4 "1999-06-17T19:55:00Z")

</div>

How do you know a sleepwaling person is not conscious? All we know is that they have no memory of consciousness during the sleepwalking. If conscious activity is not imprinted on the memory in some way - how could you tell a person was conscious?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 1999, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/5 "1999-06-17T23:04:00Z")

</div>

Lance is on the right track. The discussion of computers is an interesting diversion.  
“Conciousness is the faculty of awareness - the faculty of perceiving that which exists.  
…  
Directly of indirectly, every phenomenon of consciousness is derived from one’s awareness of the external world. Some object, i.e. some content, is involved in every state of awareness…  
A content-less state of awareness is a contradiction in terms.” Introduction to Objectivist Epsitemology, Ayn Rand.

Obviously what I quote here is a very superficial treatment. If you want to read the most well-thought-out and comprehensive work on conciousness on the market, I suggest the above book. It is a serious read but well worth it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 1999, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conciousness/110/6 "1999-06-24T12:21:00Z")

</div>

AI is the basis for more movies  
and books then you can shake a  
mouse at. You got to realize the  
importants of it. Think of what  
terminator 1 & 2 were about and  
you’ll get the picture. Imagine  
if you were trying out your new  
PC and it realized it was a PC.  
Would you have the right to turn  
it off ? It knows it is it like  
you know you’re you. What if it  
got scared you would turn it off  
and it tryed to find a way to turn  
you off first. Conciousness Might  
just be awareness. who knows what  
all is aware. Do whales and  
dolfins laugh at us or perhaps cry  
for us? Do trees observe us with  
wonder? Does a flower enjoy the  
wind fondling it on a warm summer  
day? To think the way we see  
things is more accurate or real  
then what others see is  
nearsighted at best. Bees can see  
ultaviolet which is beyond our  
visible spectrum. dogs and other  
animals can hear things far higher  
or lower then our range. It  
doesn’t make there perception of  
reality less acurate but more.  
ranges above and below our sinces  
are there we just can’t percieve  
them without special tools. Some  
creatures may hear colors and see  
sounds. they may know alot more  
about whats going on then us. We  
might be shocked to see there  
reality. I am concious because I  
think I am. They might think they  
are too.

* * *

Shiningnight
