# Congressional reapportionment numbers are in

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808
**Category:** Politics & Elections
**Created:** [April 26, 2021, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808 "2021-04-26T19:54:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/1 "2021-04-26T19:54:36Z")

</div>

> <https://twitter.com/redistrict/status/1386760864267649032?s=21>

Not nearly as bad as it could have been for the Democrats:

TX gets two new seats  
FL, OR, CO, MT, NC get one new seat

NY, IL, CA, WV, MI, OH, PA lose one seat each.

NY only losing one seat is amazing. Arizona didn’t get a new seat is also a surprise. I’ve already seen right wing media gloating over CA losing a seat.

For Republicans, they get only 3 new seats in FL/TX to gerrymander, they’ve got complete control in both states.

The House could go either way in the 2022 midterms, there’s likely to be a lot of retirements anyway as the Dems have a very old caucus. I assume they’ll be some interesting battlegrounds when the new districts are drawn. With NY only losing one seat (some estimates had as many as 3) there won’t be a primary battle with any of the incumbent progressives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/2 "2021-04-26T20:10:20Z")

</div>

There’s looking at this from an Electoral College point of view, but also a Congressional.

My ill-informed guess on impact to the House:  
TX: +1 R, +1 D  
FL: +1 R  
OR: +1 D  
CO: +1 D  
MT: +1 R  
NC: +1 tossup  
NY: -1 R  
IL: -1 tossup  
CA: -1 R  
WV: -1 R  
MI: -1 D  
OH: -1 R  
PA: -1 tossup

For totals of +3 R, +3 D, +1 ?, -4 R, -1 D, -2 ?, with a delta of -1 R, +2 D, -1 ?.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/3 "2021-04-26T20:20:34Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> TX: +1 R, +1 D  
> FL: +1 R  
> OR: +1 D  
> CO: +1 D  
> MT: +1 R  
> NC: +1 tossup  
> NY: -1 R  
> IL: -1 tossup  
> CA: -1 R  
> WV: -1 R  
> MI: -1 D  
> OH: -1 R  
> PA: -1 tossup

That seems overly optimistic for the Democrats, but I’d be happy if it turned out that way.

ETA: My guess is that just like in the EC, the big redistricting fights will be in the “blue wall” states of MI, PA, and WI. Democratic governors and Republican legislatures in those three states, which are already highly gerrymandered, will make for the most interesting redistricting fights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/4 "2021-04-26T20:29:37Z")

</div>

I think the biggest fight will be in TX to see how badly they can gerrymander. Of course, a district that looks R today can look a lot different down the line a few years. Especially if it elects a 100% unapologetic Trumper who can’t possible pass for a moderate

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/5 "2021-04-26T20:36:23Z")

</div>

> [@FlikTheBlue](#):
>
> That seems overly optimistic for the Democrats, but I’d be happy if it turned out that way.

It probably is optimistic. I thinking about the rural-urban divide. States tend to lose people from their rural areas, and gain people in their urban areas. So the “default” is that states lose R seats and gain D seats. Of course, each state has its own demographics and I’m making bold guesses to that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![E-DUB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/e-dub/32/403_2.png) [@E-DUB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-DUB)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/6 "2021-04-26T21:14:31Z")

</div>

Michigan might not be as interesting as we enacted, in 2018, a ballot proposal for an independent commission to draw the lines.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/7 "2021-04-26T22:01:39Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> My ill-informed guess on impact to the House:  
> TX: +1 R, +1 D  
> FL: +1 R  
> OR: +1 D  
> CO: +1 D  
> MT: +1 R  
> NC: +1 tossup  
> NY: -1 R  
> IL: -1 tossup  
> CA: -1 R  
> WV: -1 R  
> MI: -1 D  
> OH: -1 R  
> PA: -1 tossup

There’s simply no way that Texas Republicans (who have the Governor’s office and both chamber of the Legislature) let one of the new seats go to the Democrats – at least not intentionally. Also in North Carolina, the (Democratic) Governor does not have veto power over maps passed by the (Republican) Legislature, so that seat’s going to go R.

But still a better position for Ds to be in than many feared.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![John\_Bredin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/96bed5/32.png) [@John\_Bredin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Bredin)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/8 "2021-04-26T22:59:23Z")

</div>

Illinois loses 18,000 residents out of 12.8 million (14/100s of a percent!) in a decade and it loses one out of 18 congressional seats when the average population represented by a congressperson is over 700,000?! 🤨 We had 12.8 million in the 2010 census, and we _ **still** _ have 12.8 million in the 2020 census, we didn’t drop to 12.1 million or something. WTF?!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/9 "2021-04-26T23:06:08Z")

</div>

It’s a crazy formula they use to determine it. NY lost a seat because of 89 people? And had they kept that seat, the seat loss would be Minnesota. Weird math

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Maserschmidt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/maserschmidt/32/18829_2.png) [@Maserschmidt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maserschmidt)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/10 "2021-04-26T23:10:29Z")

</div>

And Minnesota kept a seat by 26 people!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AlsoNamedBort](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alsonamedbort/32/3213_2.png) [@AlsoNamedBort](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AlsoNamedBort)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/11 "2021-04-26T23:11:50Z")

</div>

The total population didn’t stay static. We dropped from 4.2% to 3.8% of the total population.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/12 "2021-04-26T23:12:02Z")

</div>

No matter how you calculate the congressional seats, there are guaranteed to always be some scenarios that result in weird results. I’m pretty sure that’s been mathematically proven. Believe it or not, what we have now is about the least bad formula possible (at least, unless you allow weird things like fractional representatives whose votes count less).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/13 "2021-04-26T23:18:22Z")

</div>

“Live by the gerrymander, die by the gerrymander.”

The Republicans are going to get slaughtered in upcoming elections as they run more and more Marjorie-Taylor-Green-like candidates. We could be looking at a 250-seat Democratic House majority at some point this upcoming decade.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/14 "2021-04-26T23:24:29Z")

</div>

These kinds of predictions are just nuts. I’ll be ecstatic if it’s true, but Trump just pulled ten million extra voters out of his ass a few months ago, and Biden had to obliterate records for turnout to beat him in a close election.

Even Nate Silver doesn’t make predictions this early. Might as well flip a coin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/15 "2021-04-26T23:32:28Z")

</div>

Boy, I’m now glad I put in those hours ass a Census Enumerator in Minneapolis, Minnesota!

Though back when it finished, I was quite disillusioned with it. The process was so badly designed & run – it almost seemed like management was intentionally trying to mess it up. And maybe they were, looking at who Trump put in charge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bootb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e19b73/32.png) [@Bootb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bootb)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/16 "2021-04-26T23:42:27Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Bredin](#):
>
> Illinois loses 18,000 residents out of 12.8 million (14/100s of a percent!) in a decade and it loses one out of 18 congressional seats when the average population represented by a congressperson is over 700,000?! 🤨 We had 12.8 million in the 2010 census, and we _ **still** _ have 12.8 million in the 2020 census, we didn’t drop to 12.1 million or something. WTF?!

The raw population gain or loss is just part of the equation. Some way, some how, the national total MUST equal 435. It’s a zero-sum game. So if one state gains 500k people, and gets another seat, some other state is going to have to lose a seat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Maserschmidt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/maserschmidt/32/18829_2.png) [@Maserschmidt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maserschmidt)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/17 "2021-04-26T23:50:59Z")

</div>

Thank you for your service!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2021, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/18 "2021-04-26T23:52:04Z")

</div>

> [@E-DUB](#):
>
> Michigan might not be as interesting as we enacted, in 2018, a ballot proposal for an independent commission to draw the lines.

I just looked at the MI congressional delegation. It’s 14 seats, divided evenly. That sounds fair given the presidential votes the last two elections, but Democrats look like they’re in greater danger of losing seats than Republicans. In particular, Democrats hold the following seats with the following partisan lean. 5th district D +1, 8th district R +4, 9th district D+4, and 11th district R +2. The closest Republican seat is R +5. Democrats have two seats that are D +30 in Detroit.

Looking at the map, the 9th and 11th both look gerrymandered, with areas that wrap over, across, and back around. I haven’t looked at there history yet, but I’m betting those two districts have been held by Republicans recently, and that they were probably gerrymandered to elect Republicans. Let’s test this hypothesis.

The 11th was as Republican gain in 2012 and a hold in 2014 and 2016, which fits with the hypothesis that the Rs gerrymandered it.

The 9th looks like it’s been safely D for a while, so I was wrong about that one.

Either way, it looks like that commission has some funky shaped districts to clean up. Let’s hope they do there job.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![E-DUB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/e-dub/32/403_2.png) [@E-DUB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-DUB)
#### Post date: [April 27, 2021, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/19 "2021-04-27T00:06:25Z")

</div>

The 14 is seriously gerrymandered, but by Republicans to elect a Dem overwhelmingly. [https://www.congress.gov/member/district/brenda-lawrence/L000581](https://www.congress.gov/member/district/brenda-lawrence/L000581)

In 2018 Brenda Lawrence got 81%.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)
#### Post date: [April 27, 2021, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808/20 "2021-04-27T00:13:22Z")

</div>

Right. That’s what I gathered in my cursory glance at the map. They stuffed all the blue voters into the 13th and 14th so the Rs could have a better chance in the 9th and 11th. I obviously haven’t looked at precinct by precinct numbers, but I’m guessing a more regular shape would have resulted in the 9th and 11th being more safely blue.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/congressional-reapportionment-numbers-are-in/940808.md?page=2)
