Moderating:
Dial it back, please. This is dangerously close to calling another poster a liar, which is not allowed. You can make your arguments without being provocative or insulting.
Not a warning.
Moderating:
Dial it back, please. This is dangerously close to calling another poster a liar, which is not allowed. You can make your arguments without being provocative or insulting.
Not a warning.
Investigative journalist and Political Science scholar (/s), Randy Rainbow, has produced a comprehensive treatise that delves deeply into the intellectual prowess of Congressperson Greene and a few of her stunt doubles.
Worth the 3:52 it takes:
[Tell me you aren’t singing or whistling it over the next few days]
The person made a statement that was flat out incorrect. My character has been pretty much besmirched because of my past voting record. Way to step in there.
Moderating:
You’re fairly new here, so I’m going to cut you some slack. Once.
You can dispute moderation, but not in regular threads. If you wish to discuss the moderation I earlier imposed, you are welcome to make a thread in ATMB to discuss it further.
“Way to step in there” could be interpreted as being disrespectful to a moderator and is an automatic basis for a formal warning. In fact, I’d suggest that most moderators would view it that way. I’m going to overlook it this time. Again, once.
I encourage you to reconsider how you approach posting in this forum going forward.
Was it your past voting record or,
that did it?
This could’ve gone in the schadenfraude thread, but, coin flips…
[quote] The voters are represented by Free Speech for People, a national election and campaign finance reform group, which has filed a similar challenge against U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn in North Carolina that has been blocked by a federal judge.
and this bon mot:
If I didn’t have to retire for the evening I would’ve dived (dove?) into the mirk for some low-hanging-fruit cites that might beg to differ with her contention, if at all necessary, to begin with.
The chyron caption says “Rep. Greene Speaks in Georgia,” but it really should say “Rep. Greene Speaks in Red Hat Gibberish.”
So…gas powered vehicles are ok?
I must have missed a news item or two: women’s toilets are being invaded by married gays on electric bicycles?
A spokesperson for Secretary Buttigiegg said that the bathroom talks had stalled, that the Secretary couldn’t predict just watt would come of the ongoing bicycle talks, and assured a hopeful nation that he and his spouse were going to take the whole thing day bidet.
Chuck Norris pops wheelies on a unicycle.
You know, I opened this thread and went immediately to the last post, and up there is what I saw. No context, no nothing. And I thought of a little book that someone should prepare. Random Running Coach posts without context. Even Ken Nordine would be jealous.
Nothing Greene ever says makes sense, but hey, if it pops the red-hats.
“Pete Buttigieg can take his electric vehicles and his bicycles and he and his husband can stay out of our girls’ bathrooms.”
That’s just crying out for a new Internet meme…
So…when she goes to the mike on the floor of the House, is it like open mike night? Can’t anyone go on after her and refute her horseshit?
I assume there isn’t a Congressional Gong, or hooked stick?
MTG defines women: they are rib, for his pleasure.
So why did she put herself up as a candidate and not her husband?
(Just curious, honest - I really don’t understand the mentality)
To quote Paul, ‘Marjorie Taylor Greene? Shut the fuck up.’
I mean if she’s gonna get all Christian on us then she should do what the Bible says.
Her mentality? Well Wayne sums it up.