watchwolf49
Are there going to be unicorns and elves in this fairy tale? I like the ones with unicorns and elves.
Funny you should say that, just heard news on the radio that our local nurseries have sold a mess of local flora to the Hollywood types. Guess there’s going to be a spat of unicorn and elf movies coming up. I can assure you that there is absolutly no place for Big Foot to hide in Big Foot Country, half has been clear cut and the other half is thick with deer hunters.
No, we’re looking real good here whatever the climate decides to do. I’ll be more than happy to suffer through California’s weather. Belch that CO2, suckers, go ahead.
Mr. Boehner is that you? Please tell the other Oompa Loompas to stop using stupid unscientific sources as the basis to vote against EPA regulations of CO2.
What exactly do you mean by “AGW”? Although I have been referred to as a “denier” or a “skeptic,” it is possible that we actually agree.
Keep going! I’ve almost got my Bingo! 
Is there a #10. “Global warming is happening, it is caused by humanity, but it may be a good thing[26] - but I’ll only heat my home with wind power to be safe”
https://www.portlandgeneral.com/residential/renewable_energy/default.aspx
#11 “I vote”
There’s my two votes in the Senate … how do your votes stack up?
When California becomes unlivable, where do you imagine they will all go? The Crips, the Bloods, the hookers and druggies and pimps? Put some more water in the soup, Ma, company’s coming!
Can you explain why California will become unlivable … in your own words … particularly focus on your certainty, please. The proletariat will simply move inland, we’re safe expecting just the upper middle class and their servants.
Did you check your senators’ voting records … just how bad is it?
Franken and Klobuchar? Pretty fair.
Oh fucking hell, yet another attempt to do … something … about … beliefs … about … some … still undefined … danger
It’s like the goddamn mental reversal of the idiot sermon on Fukushima, in this case the shrill batshit insane “voices of reason”, they actually believe that it’s the “belief” that is the danger, the problem, the true threat to mankind, the “belief” that there is no crisis is the real crisis. (with Fukushima it was “fear” that was the real danger, not radiation)
The essential question, even in this topic, is what IS IT they are spending a BILLION GODDAMN DOLLARS a year fighting?
In this case it’s called “climate change”, or rather “action on climate change”. So, being completely gullible and just accepting the claim as fact (because, hey, why not? Why be skeptical?) some cabal of evil rich people are spending a billion dollars of their hard earned cash to stop other people from doing something about “climate change”. Which of course the fucktards of the world translate to “global warming”, which they mentally replace with human caused global warming. Yes, the “rational” people, who run a site actually named rationalwiki (to differentiate it from wikipedia, which of course isn’t rational like they are), all definitions lead to global warming. Which is also called AGW.
Hey, don’t take my word for it, follow the goddamn links. It’s what rationalwiki does. Which makes it even worse than Wikipedia when it comes to “advancing knowledge”. But at least there you can actually get to a definition of AGW, unlike Wikipedia.
So what does AGW mean?
Oh christ on a pogo stick. That’s like if you ask “What do you mean by the CIA?” and the answer is “the Central Intelligence Agency”. Thank you very much you complete waste of time.
But of course a happy little topic about how rich people spent, like, 20 billion dollars so far fighting action on AGW, it turns into yet another argument over … something. Something stupid.
In what insane world do these people live? seriously. What the fuck are you smoking? What warm Kool Aid did you drink?
Oh please, you know good and damn well that ratspit crazy will never be backed up with any science, not even an attempt. crazy never feels the need to use logic or facts or even some reason. It just spews ignorance like a jacked up crack head after robbing his grandmas bank account.
And throws a tantrum when you call them on their bullshit.
Wait, what’s that? Long winded spew? Rabid screeching? More FX nonsense? Well fuck me but I didn’t spend 58 goddamn posts over the holidays posting the same stupid fucking shit over and over and over. And yeah, that was GIGOgalloper, with a copy and paste and his usual idiot stew so bad even some of his supporters realized he is most likely the worst thing to ever happen to the global warming cause. Hahah OK that was just rhetoric and it’s not really true. not that anyone even is going to read his far into a wall of text, or goddamn I hope not.
Shit, what if somebody actually is? That’s either awesome or really fucking sad. Or both. Or wait a fucking minute. What about the topic? Are rich bitches really spending that sort of bank to fuck with efforts to save the world? Are they ACTUALLY reptilians? Aliens who want the world to die? Who like it warm? Goddamn lizard people. Fuck you reptiliians overlords.
That’s just fucking GREAT ain’t it? First they come down and sell us oil and gas and coal and shit like that, then use OUR GODDAMN MONEY to try and stop us from saving ourselves from the effects of using that shit in the first place. (and maybe they are the ones cutting down all the trees? Evil fuckers, ain’t they?)
The real question is, can we DO anything about it? Despite that kind of money, can we stop them? Obviously they won’t stop, their little reptile children will be just fine. But the rest of us, we need to do something.
After all, if California becomes uninhabitable, where will all the cool movies come from? What about Silicon Valley? Where will we grow lettuce? It’s a goddamn crisis. And these rich bitches are spending billions to stop us!
Goddamn it. This global warming is making me sick.
Wait, wrong topic. These rich sons of bitches are making me sick.
We’re spending a trillion dollars a year protecting the oil fields … just saying …
This means that you are numnuts, but then again, many knew that already. 
Can not speak for others, but I only bring places like Rationalwiki to demonstrate only how groups that look at pseudoscience report about the issue, and what they report is that people like you are not even aware of what many skeptics and groups that look at pseudoscience are reporting.
As we already have the definition from more respected sites like NASA, your efforts are only an attempt at one very stupid point, to reduce not only sources that link to the science, but also even the sites that investigate pseudoscience for a living as unreliable just because they do not report the most **obvious **items.
Claiming that those sites are not reliable just because they do not comfort to your idiotic semantic extremism are like that comic book guy calling the Mystery Science Theater 3000 episode of “Space Mutiny” as the “worst episode ever” only because Mike and the bots never ever made a joke or reference to the old Battle Star Galactica TV show. (The bad movie used lots of footage from the original cheesy TV show).
As for the rest of your screed, meltdowns are not pretty. Except for the ones that saw it coming. 
Anthropomorphic Global Warming
This is the imposing of human attributes to the phenomenon of Global Warming. It’s a symptom of very low IQ, although it’s more typically used in relation to family pets or a bookcase. Neighbor girl and my penhen were best buddies there for a while. In context it’s just a piece of slippery Orwellian Doublespeak for pollution.
I hope that’s helpful …
Not really, but is helpful to identify people like you that think that no one will notice that scientific organizations, academia, and even people that investigate pseudoscience do identify the ones not using science and doing the double speak.
And Congressman John Shimkus, Republican from Illinois is one of those that shows that low IQ symptom and he is still working towards preventing concerted efforts to deal with the issue.
Oh the sweet irony, the burn, of trying to put somebody down, and not knowing how to fucking spell numbnuts. Of course since English is a strange language to you, it’s not fair to laugh at your ignorance due to poor writing. Certainly there is more than enough to laugh about, leaving that aside.
Ahahahaha oh you numbnut you. I didn’t say any of that. I just pointed out how fuck ass stupid even a group like rationalwiki can be, when it comes to AGW. They actually have every last term redirecting to their global warming page, which sucks pretty bad. From a scientific point of view. If you want to be seen as all smart and shit like that, you really need to try harder there.
Maybe to some people. The fucktards have for sure tried to make CO2 a pollutant. Which is so unscientific, it made Dyson cry.
You have not done anything here, only double down on avoiding that my point was that you are not fooling people by declaring a group that is pointed out for investigating pseudoscience, and making the twist to calling it a scientific one (the straw-man) to make it sound as if you are doing a smart thing.
Like if one could not check why is that the scientists and experts report about what an ignorant you are regarding CO2.
http://www.wunderground.com/resources/climate/cei.asp
Not to mention that your demonstratively wrong idea about CO2 not being a pollutant shows again the endemic contradictions coming from guys like you, more than once you do accept that ocean acidification is a problem, and that is caused by CO2 pollution of the oceans.
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/pollution-overview/
Anthropomorphic
Look it up yourself:
(Anthropomorphism - Wikipedia)
GIGObuster … did you watch how elucidator handled himself … he tore my ideas a new asshole without claiming he knew something he didn’t. Now I can respect such a man, someone who stays within his own competence. Maybe we could practice … I’ll assert that “Watts per square meter” is a measurement of energy transfer per second, do you agree?
Its a trap!