# Continuing the discussion from Do you believe in demons and is pornography sinful?: **URL:** \ **Category:** About This Message Board\ **Created:** [July 23, 2025, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/continuing-the-discussion-from-do-you-believe-in-demons-and-is-pornography-sinful/1021247 "2025-07-23T23:33:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2025, 11:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/continuing-the-discussion-from-do-you-believe-in-demons-and-is-pornography-sinful/1021247/9 "2025-07-24T11:08:39Z")
Thank you for your detailed reply, it is appreciated. I want to clarify what I mean by gatekeeping: > [@Aspenglow](#): > > We’re not “gate keeping” I’m not saying the mods are gatekeeping, but when a poster’s reply tends along the lines to discourage others from engaging with another poster, that poster to me can be said to be gatekeeping. Or to put it another way , are you indicating is this a fair tactic to use if I feel that they other poster has such a condition? Particularly referring to the discouraging of others from engaging with them? > [@Eyebrows\_0f\_Doom](#): > > I thought **kanicbird** has said here in the past that he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. No, no such condition or anything in that general category. I was diagnosed with mild ADD which I have shared on this board. > [@Eyebrows\_0f\_Doom](#): > > I did not mean it as an attack on **kanicbird** but was directed towards **Czarcasm** because… Thank you for clarifying, though I did express my desire to **Czarcasm** to end that tangent later in the posting. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/continuing-the-discussion-from-do-you-believe-in-demons-and-is-pornography-sinful/1021247)._