# Conviction rates for rape should be low, efforts to raise them are inherently unjust

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [December 10, 2012, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630 "2012-12-10T19:01:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/21 "2012-12-12T13:40:52Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> I am sorry that you had such a bad time with the interview, but complainant interviews with police are rarely pleasant. You think that the dice is loaded against you. Well, that certainly is the case. it’s is supposed to be in favor of the accused.

I don’t think the dice were loaded against me. They certainly weren’t in that situation: the guy did the same thing there every night, it was pretty easy to prove. I’m just saying: reporting rape sucks. It sucks more than reporting other things, for various reasons. Making it a little easier on women who are reporting rape doesn’t mean that you are supporting false accusations.

You misunderstand what I’m saying: not that police departments the world over are blue meanies to women reporting rape (though sometimes they are). It just sucks to report it. Even if they’re nice, it still sucks. More than reporting theft or something, which I’ve also done.

Anyway, considering that 95% of rape goes unreported, even if 65% of convicted rapists were falsely accused it would still be low. It just means that the problem lies with how horrible it is to have to report being raped, knowing that the chances of conviction are low.

I understand your problem with the statistics. But it’s really all we have. All statistics on the subject are problematic, simply because different things are counted differently in different places. I already mentioned that in some places they count the victim dropping the case as a “false accusation”. So yes, statistics are problematic either way. That’s no reason to see a huge problem in false rape accusations when the real problem we are facing is that rape remains underreported.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e47c2d/32.png) [@Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hershele_Ostropoler)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/22 "2012-12-12T13:50:20Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Rape is different. It’s primary physical element; sex, is something almost all persons are involved in at some point in their life. Most people do not kill, take property without consent, commit fraud or wound, though all might in appropriate circumstances be praiseworthy.
> 
> Unlike most crimes, rape turns to a great on the mental element

But the analogy isn’t all sex to taking without consent, it’s all sex to all taking. If I give you a present in an isolated location, and then claim you stole it, that’s a false accusation and it turns on the mental element.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 2:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/23 "2012-12-12T14:38:06Z")

</div>

> [@gracer](#):
>
> I understand your problem with the statistics. But it’s really all we have. All statistics on the subject are problematic, simply because different things are counted differently in different places. I already mentioned that in some places they count the victim dropping the case as a “false accusation”. So yes, statistics are problematic either way. That’s no reason to see a huge problem in false rape accusations when the real problem we are facing is that rape remains underreported.

Lots of crimes are underreported. It’s not just rape. If anything, rape has a better chance of resulting in a conviction than almost every crime except murder or other homicide for the simple reason that more resources are allocated to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/24 "2012-12-12T14:47:21Z")

</div>

> [@Hershele\_Ostropoler](#):
>
> But the analogy isn’t all sex to taking without consent, it’s all sex to all taking. If I give you a present in an isolated location, and then claim you stole it, that’s a false accusation and it turns on the mental element.

No it does not. You are mixing up the legal aspect with a factual aspect, which is what it turns on. You give me a present in an isolated circumstance, it would not be theft. It would be difficult to prove, but lots of crimes are thus so difficult in appropriate circumstances. Most people do not take property of others. Plus it’s perfectly possible to take property with consent and for it to be theft, it’s also possible to be convicted of stealing your own property. It will be rape if and only if (0presuming that all the other elements are there) the accused knew or had reason to believe that consent was absent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/25 "2012-12-12T14:58:50Z")

</div>

> [@gracer](#):
>
> Anyway, considering that 95% of rape goes unreported, even if 65% of convicted rapists were falsely accused it would still be low.

95% is implausibly huge. I don’t buy it for a second.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CoastalMaineiac](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@CoastalMaineiac](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CoastalMaineiac)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/26 "2012-12-12T15:00:04Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> 95% is implausibly huge. I don’t buy it for a second.

I was thinking the same thing. How do you come up with a figure for something that isn’t reported anyway?😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/27 "2012-12-12T15:12:01Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Lots of crimes are underreported. It’s not just rape. If anything, rape has a better chance of resulting in a conviction than almost every crime except murder or other homicide for the simple reason that more resources are allocated to it.

Lots of crimes are underreported, but probably not to the same extent. 95% of rapes not being reported is a huge amount. Quick googling says it’s about 50% for burglary.

The point is, it’s entirely understandable. I always report my bike stolen, every bloody time it happens. It’s annoying and you never get your bike back anyway. But I dutifully do it. I’m not sure I’d report assault again. I’d only do it if I was very sure it would lead to something, as I was that time.

When we were 16 a good friend told me she had been raped by her boyfriend, also 16. I offered to go the police with her. She said no, because what would be the point? They were alone at his house. She couldn’t even prove they had sex, let alone that she didn’t consent. She was right, of course. It would only have been a horrendous ordeal for her, with very little chance of him being convicted.

I didn’t report my rape for similar reasons: there was no point trying.

As I already said: I know many women who have been raped, and most don’t report it. For very good reasons. Not reporting rape sadly makes a whole lot of sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/28 "2012-12-12T15:19:44Z")

</div>

> [@gracer](#):
>
> Lots of crimes are underreported, but probably not to the same extent. 95% of rapes not being reported is a huge amount.

It’s a ridiculously high amount, it looks like something that someone came up with the goal of “what’s the highest percentage we can claim short of 100% without people laughing at us”.

It also doesn’t fit very well with the claim that false accusations are rare; if the number of reported rapes is so _tiny_ then I’d expect the false accusations to outnumber the true ones heavily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/29 "2012-12-12T15:29:03Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> It’s a ridiculously high amount, it looks like something that someone came up with the goal of “what’s the highest percentage we can claim short of 100% without people laughing at us”.
> 
> It also doesn’t fit very well with the claim that false accusations are rare; if the number of reported rapes is so _tiny_ then I’d expect the false accusations to outnumber the true ones heavily.

You read the figure in several sources and estimates, but I can’t really claim it as truth one way or the other. It fits exactly with my own experience though, I’m trying to think if I know anyone who actually has reported being raped. I’m not sure I do, but I’m still thinking. It’s also why I explained above that not reporting makes a lot of sense in the case of rape.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e47c2d/32.png) [@Hershele\_Ostropoler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hershele_Ostropoler)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/30 "2012-12-12T15:30:59Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> No it does not. You are mixing up the legal aspect with a factual aspect, which is what it turns on. You give me a present in an isolated circumstance, it would not be theft.

And consensual sex is not rape. Do you believe that consensual sex happens?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![colander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@colander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/colander)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/31 "2012-12-12T15:48:39Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> It’s a ridiculously high amount, it looks like something that someone came up with the goal of “what’s the highest percentage we can claim short of 100% without people laughing at us”.

“That can’t be right!” is not a convincing rebuttal. Have you issues with the methodology used? Do you perhaps know of some better data that you’d like to share with us? I do so enjoy new data.

> [@](#):
>
> It also doesn’t fit very well with the claim that false accusations are rare; if the number of reported rapes is so _tiny_ then I’d expect the false accusations to outnumber the true ones heavily.

I am not at all certain I understand your reasoning here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/32 "2012-12-12T16:12:52Z")

</div>

> [@colander](#):
>
> “That can’t be right!” is not a convincing rebuttal. Have you issues with the methodology used? Do you perhaps know of some better data that you’d like to share with us? I do so enjoy new data.

I do not know about **Der Trihs** but I do have an issue with the methodology. It is non existent. They pulled a number out of their ass. Its a bare assertion backed up precisely nothing. The [UK Governments own commission called it bollocks](http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100418065537/http://equalities.gov.uk/PDF/Stern_Review_acc_FINAL.pdf). (PDF)  
As Lady Stern says at page 43 of the above report

[QUOTE=Stern Review]  
The way the c**onviction rate figure for rape is calculated is unusual.  
Conviction rates are not published or even measured in this way for  
any other crime so it is very difficult to make a comparison**. The use of  
the term ‘conviction rate’ is in itself unusual.\*\* ‘Conviction rate’ usually  
describes the percentage of all the cases brought to court that end with  
the defendant being convicted. When dealing with rape the term has  
come to be used in a different way and describes the percentage of all  
the cases recorded by the police as a rape that end up with someone  
being convicted of rape. **The figure arrived at is usually around six per  
cent. Some studies show that a further six per cent are convicted of  
another offence, usually a less serious sexual offence, but still convicted,  
so the conviction rate by this method of analysis is 12 per cent.  
37  
…** It is clear to us that the figure of convictions for  
people of all ages charged with\* rape is 58 per cen_t, as the term is  
normally used in relation to crime\*\*.  
38  
That figure, which covers all rape  
cases and includes those whose cases come before a jury and those  
who plead guilty, is properly arrived at. It is also clear that in jury trials  
when juries deliberate and reach a verdict the conviction rate for rape  
of a female 16 or older is 47 per cent (that is excluding all those who  
plead guilty),**[I] a higher percentage than for some other serious and  
violent crimes**_

[/QUOTE]

In short, the statistic is bullshit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pravnik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8edcca/32.png) [@pravnik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pravnik)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/33 "2012-12-12T16:27:12Z")

</div>

> [@CoastalMaineiac](#):
>
> I was thinking the same thing. How do you come up with a figure for something that isn’t reported anyway?😕

The Department of Justice - Bureau of Justice Statistics collects data on reported and unreported crime by use of the National Crime Victimization Survey. I’ve heard past figures as high as 90%, but the most recent figures on unreported rapes is around 65%, which makes it second only to household theft in being the crime least often reported to the police. The most often reported crime is motor vehicle theft, only 17% going unreported.

[National Crime Victimization Survey: Victimizations Not Reported to the Police, 2006-2010](http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/vnrp0610.pdf).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SciFiSam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/47e85d/32.png) [@SciFiSam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SciFiSam)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/34 "2012-12-12T16:27:56Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> I do not know about **Der Trihs** but I do have an issue with the methodology. It is non existent. They pulled a number out of their ass. Its a bare assertion backed up precisely nothing. The [UK Governments own commission called it bollocks](http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100418065537/http://equalities.gov.uk/PDF/Stern_Review_acc_FINAL.pdf). (PDF)  
> As Lady Stern says at page 43 of the above report  
> In short, the statistic is bullshit.

But that lowest figure there excludes people who plead guilty in jury trials, which surely changes the number significantly.

95% of rapes may well be unreported if it includes multiple acts of rape against one individual by another individual. That would change the results significantly too. I’m on my phone, so thread searching is hard - where’s the link to the 95% statistic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/35 "2012-12-12T16:42:22Z")

</div>

^  
The point is that i) the statistics used to put forward the 95% figure are based upon a technique not used for other crimes and ii) and more importantky statistics are meaningless in something like the Criminal Justice System.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/36 "2012-12-12T16:58:58Z")

</div>

Wait, aren’t we confusing the conviction rate with the underreporting of rape now?  
I get that the conviction rate quoted isn’t calculated in the same way as conviction rates for other crimes. We can still discuss what it means that only 6% of reported rapes end in conviction (note that is always the way it is mentioned, it is also the way I described it). That is the important consideration when you are considering reporting rape. Not the conviction rate as it should be calculated in order to compare it to other crimes.

The 95% figure is related to the underreporting of rape. I alway assume that figure is derived through surveys.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/37 "2012-12-12T17:00:41Z")

</div>

But the technique pravnik linked to is the same. And looking at that 65% of crimes committed against you by someone you know we’ll go unreported. It isn’t at all surprising then that a high number of rapes, which are far more likely to be acquaintance rapes than a stranger rape, are under reported.

Few women accuse their abusive husbands of rape, for instance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![colander](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@colander](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/colander)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/38 "2012-12-12T17:06:51Z")

</div>

> [@SciFiSam](#):
>
> But that lowest figure there excludes people who plead guilty in jury trials, which surely changes the number significantly.
> 
> 95% of rapes may well be unreported if it includes multiple acts of rape against one individual by another individual. That would change the results significantly too. I’m on my phone, so thread searching is hard - where’s the link to the 95% statistic?

I can’t find any original sources for a 95% figure, although it keeps popping up uncited in UK government reports. I did find a 2007 CDC survey that got 1.3 million reports of rape incidents in a year where only 83,000 rapes were reported to police. [http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS\_FactSheet-a.pdf](http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_FactSheet-a.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pravnik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8edcca/32.png) [@pravnik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pravnik)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/39 "2012-12-12T18:08:41Z")

</div>

There was a joint study by the Department of Justice - Bureau of Justice Statistics and the National Institute of Justice in 2000 that showed that around 95% of those responding that they were victims of completed or attempted rape did not report it to the police, but that study dealt specifically with college women.

[The Sexual Victimization of College Women](https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@bup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bup)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2012, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630/40 "2012-12-12T18:44:06Z")

</div>

> [@drewtwo99](#):
>
> I’m sorry if this is threadshitting but I just can’t seem to muster up even a single fucking ounce of sympathy for all these poor hypothetical men being wrongly convicted of rape.

They’re not hypothetical. A lot of men have been wrongly convicted of rape. Frequently it’s because of sincere but mistaken eyewitness identification by the victim.

The book [_ **False Justice** _](http://www.falsejustice.com/) covers it well, and goes deep into a few cases where men were picked out of a lineup, and as more time went on, the more certain the rape victim became that the man she picked out was the perpetrator, because of how human memory works.

So, to address the OP, when we’re already making mistakes and convicting innocent people, changing laws to make it easier to convict is a bad idea. Rather, raising the level of evidence, and training police better, is the way to get more (and accurate) convictions.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/conviction-rates-for-rape-should-be-low-efforts-to-raise-them-are-inherently-unjust/643630.md?page=3)
