Honestly, the best argument for the American Revolution is the case it created for self-determination of other people all over the world. It wasn’t really necessary from an American point of view, even with the benefit of hindsight; Canada did just fine with a gradual shift to self-government.
I know you want reasons which were applicable at the time, and I think that’s one, though it’s better as a reason given today.
Not households. The Quartering Act authorized commanders to quarter troops in:
“inns, livery stables, ale houses, victuallinghouses, and the houses of sellers of wine by retail to be drank in their own houses or places thereunto belonging, and all houses of persons selling of rum, brandy, strong water, cyder or metheglin, by retail, to be drank in houses . .”
and, should those not be available, and should the colonial assemblies not be willing to authorize the building of shelter for the troops,
“uninhabited houses, outhouses, barns, or other buildings, as shall be necessary”
I’m implying that the rule of the British monarch over the unwilling American colonists was more of a minority imposition than the democracy imposed by the independence-desiring colonists on those who might have preferred to remain British subjects.