# Cooking with fire: Charcoal vs Wood **URL:** \ **Category:** In My Humble Opinion\ **Created:** [August 23, 2004, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cooking-with-fire-charcoal-vs-wood/261037 "2004-08-23T02:19:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![SSgtBaloo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ac91a4/32.png) [@SSgtBaloo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SSgtBaloo)\ **Post date:** [August 23, 2004, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cooking-with-fire-charcoal-vs-wood/261037/1 "2004-08-23T02:19:19Z")
My nephew uses the grill to cook dinner throughout the summer, and I was just wondering – if charcoal is made from compressed wood waste, wouldn’t it be more efficient to just use the wood briquettes rather than charcoal? What makes charcoal superior to wood for grilling food? Secondary question: just how is charcoal made anyway? –SSgtBaloo ---
**Author:** ![Rick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9f8e36/32.png) [@Rick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick)\ **Post date:** [August 23, 2004, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cooking-with-fire-charcoal-vs-wood/261037/2 "2004-08-23T03:36:08Z")
There are two types of charcoal. Briquettes, and lump. Briquettes are made from wood scrap, fillers, and binders. Think Kingsford, or Matchlite or the alike. Lump charcoal is made from solid chunks of wood. No binders, no fillers, just wood. Lump has much less residue due to the lack of fillers. Charcoal is made by burning wood in a low oxygen environment. The water, and much of the volatile organic compounds are driven off. What is left is a wood fuel in a handy to use form. 🙂 If you look on this [page](http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpdatabase/lumpbag22.htm) you will see some pictures of lump charcoal, and will be able to recognize pieces of wood. That page is from [lump charcoal database](http://www.nakedwhiz.com/lumpindexpage.htm?bag) where you can read reviews of various brands of lump. Me I use lump in my q. Better flavor, and burns hotter.