Yes there are ways to get around the “Jackie Coogan Law.”
First of all remember the “Jackie Coogan Law,” is a California law, not a nationwide law. Since most movies and TV take place in California, it works for the most part. And most states have similar type laws but those aren’t as strict as California’s law.
Second remember that a parent is entitled to a portion of his child’s income, whether it’s in a film or if he works at Taco Bell. (There are a few exceptions to this)
A lot of money earned by child actors is missing but it’s not really missing. Like any actor they still have to pay, managers (10% to 20%) agency fees (another 10% to 15%) then accountants, lawyer fees etc.
OK if I recall the kids on “Home Improvement” earned $10,000/episode. The show ran for 9 years and ran for 204 episodes. OK let’s say for the sake of argument one of the kids was in all 204 episodes.
$10,000 X 204 = $2,040,000
Out of that amount subtract out 10% for agent fees and 10% for manager fees (it was probably higher)
2,040,000 - 408,000 = -1,632.000 now how much of that goes to taxes 40% or more? Let's say 40% or 816,000 (off the 2+ Million). So subtract that from 1.6 million and get $816,000
OK the math is a little weak with the estimates,l but you can see alreayd this Over two million dollars earned by a child actor over 9 years isn’t even a million dollars now
And again, I wasn’t even accounting for lawyers and such which also grab a cut.
Now if the family may try to save manager fees for example by making a parent the manager. This is usually a bad idea. Look at Macauley Culkin, his parents made BAD CHOICES for him in movie roles. He’s also not a good example, because “Home Alone,” was a fluke. It was low budget and no one ever thought it would do as good as it did. No one on that movie got paid what they were worth, 'cause no one though it’d be the megahit it was.