# Coronavirus COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Thread - 2021 Breaking News

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428>\
**Category:** The Quarantine Zone\
**Tags:** covid-quarantine\
**Created:** [January 1, 2021, 8:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428 "2021-01-01T08:03:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/751 "2021-03-08T17:00:35Z")

</div>

> **[CDC Says It's Safe For Vaccinated People To Do These Activities](https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/03/08/974783644/cdc-says-its-safe-for-vaccinated-people-to-do-these-activities)**
>
> New guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 can gather indoors in some circumstances but should keep wearing masks in public.

> …  
> Here’s the CDC’s specific guidance for what fully vaccinated people can do:
> 
> - "Visit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing;
> - "Visit with unvaccinated people from a single household who are at low risk for severe COVID-19 disease indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing
> - “Refrain from quarantine and testing following a known exposure to COVID-19 if asymptomatic”
> 
> The CDC said fully vaccinated people should continue to take these COVID-19 precautions:
> 
> - "Take precautions in public like wearing a well-fitted mask and physical distancing
> - "Wear masks, practice physical distancing, and adhere to other prevention measures when visiting with unvaccinated people who are at [increased risk for severe COVID-19](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/index.html) disease or who have an unvaccinated household member who is at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease
> - "Wear masks, maintain physical distance, and practice other prevention measures when visiting with unvaccinated people from multiple households
> - "Avoid medium- and large-sized in-person gatherings
> - "Get tested if experiencing COVID-19 symptoms
> - "Follow guidance issued by individual employers
> - “Follow CDC and health department travel requirements and recommendations”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/752 "2021-03-08T19:16:31Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Oklahoma:  
> [The Latest: San Diego zoo vaccinates 9 great apes for virus | AP News](https://apnews.com/article/sri-lanka-coronavirus-pandemic-coronavirus-vaccine-indian-ocean-russia-810fd365381bfa0e924548acdc06295a)  
> This seems high. The entire population of Oklahoma is only 4 million people.

So claims are about $1,100 per resident? Given 10% unemployment that’d be $11K per claimant. Given that unemployment pays for a year or so under the current congressional actions, that sounds about right to me. Folks are getting less than min wage worth of benefits.

What are you finding strange and why?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/753 "2021-03-08T19:35:47Z")

</div>

> [@Tfletch1](#):
>
> > [@Melbourne](#):
> >
> > [Hydrating the respiratory tract: an alternative explanation why masks lower severity of COVID-19: Biophysical Journal (cell.com)](https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495(21)00116-8)
> > 
> > " We demonstrate that normal breathing results in an absorption-desorption cycle inside facemasks, in which supersaturated air is absorbed by the mask fibers during expiration, followed by evaporation during inspiration of dry environmental air."
> > 
> > "We propose that the recently reported, disease-attenuating effect of generic facemasks is dominated by the strong humidity increase of inspired air. "
> 
> Super cool. I thought that humidity within the mask would help to keep droplets to large to make it far enough along the respiratory tract. The authors are suggesting that the humidity helps by promoting a nice mucus layer allowing for cilia to push pathogens back up.

fascinating! This is consistent with stuff I’ve read about having a humidifier in the bedroom to reduce your risk of catching respiratory bugs. Not because it prevents exposure, but because it supports the immune function of the mucus membranes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/754 "2021-03-08T20:12:59Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> “Follow CDC and health department travel requirements and recommendations”

Interesting. CDC currently says no one should be traveling.

> [@](#):
>
> COVID-19 Alert: Cases are Extremely High. Avoid Travel
> 
> Travel increases your chance of getting and spreading COVID-19. CDC recommends that you do not travel at this time. Delay travel and stay home to protect yourself and others from COVID-19.

Both of our kids’ grandmothers have been vaccinated fully +2 weeks, and have been asking about visiting. The pushier one has started pushing for a date at the end of April. I wanted to wait for CDC guidance because no one in our house, so far, is vaccinated. Due to underlying conditions, my spouse and I will be eligible for vaccination at the end of this month, but who knows how long it will take to get an appointment and then be fully protected. And, there are still 2 8-year-olds who won’t be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/755 "2021-03-08T20:22:40Z")

</div>

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> I wanted to wait for CDC guidance because no one in our house, so far, is vaccinated. Due to underlying conditions, my spouse and I

See post 751 above.

[ETA: Good grief. When I click on that post’s time stamp, it says 751, it really does. However the scroll bar says this is only post 725. Look up about four posts, anyway.]

As I’m reading that info, because you’re not low risk, even though they’re vaccinated they’re not supposed to be around you unless masked and distanced, until you’re also “fully vaccinated”; which I would take to be two weeks after the second dose of the two-shot vaccine.

Recommends might change again by then, I suppose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/756 "2021-03-08T20:39:48Z")

</div>

True.

I’m not looking forward to that argument. (With my mother-in-law (MIL)). She’s already pushy, and she tends to follow only advice that she likes. She was mad that her sister traveled and visited their mother early in the pandemic, after the sister had recovered from Covid. But she – MIL – has been traveling plenty since then to visit her son’s family, before anyone was vaccinated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/757 "2021-03-08T20:46:33Z")

</div>

Based on the newly issued CDC [guidelines](https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html), it might be OK for your kids’ grandparents to visit them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/758 "2021-03-08T20:54:33Z")

</div>

It wasn’t clear, I guess, but I was quoting Thelma Lou’s quote of the guidelines.

I was pointing out that it may be within the guidelines for them to visit our household, but it isn’t within the guidelines for them to travel, because the guidelines incorporate the travel guidelines, and they’d both have to travel.

@thorny_locust also pointed out that it isn’t within the guidelines because my spouse and I both have underlying conditions that mean we are not low risk.

Sorry for the confusion in my post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikecurtis](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikecurtis/32/3284_2.png) [@mikecurtis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mikecurtis)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/759 "2021-03-08T21:22:41Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> 29,696,250 total cases

As of today the US has more _fully_ vaccinated persons than verified cases!  
While we’ve still got a ways to go, that’s clearly a positive milestone!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/760 "2021-03-08T23:58:06Z")

</div>

> [@Tfletch1](#):
>
> allowing for cilia to push pathogens back up.

But note that smoking (which burns the cilia off) has not been shown to be a risk factor for contracting COVID.

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> fascinating! This is consistent with stuff I’ve read about having a humidifier in the bedroom to reduce your risk of catching respiratory bugs. Not because it prevents exposure, but because it supports the immune function of the mucus membranes.

But note that the last outbreak in Melb.vic.au (where I live), was attributed to the use of a humidifier promoting escape of COVID from quarantine.  
(That’s a deeply political statement, not a cold scientific fact: I don’t know how they assert the humidifier was involved.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/761 "2021-03-09T01:31:21Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> But note that smoking (which burns the cilia off) has not been shown to be a risk factor for contracting COVID.

Really? Is this a technical quibble about proof? Or has the risk been shown to be 100% about pre-existing lung damage? Because being a current or former smoker has been identified as a risk factor pretty much from the beginning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 1:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/762 "2021-03-09T01:47:15Z")

</div>

Very old research, and I probably shouldn’t be quoting it:  
[French-study-suggests-smokers-at-lower-risk-of-getting-coronavirus | World news | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/22/french-study-suggests-smokers-at-lower-risk-of-getting-coronavirus).  
I responded by wondering if the lowered risk is because cilia are (thought to be) particularly susceptible to COVID: perhaps burning off the layer of epithelial cells which COVID infects offers protection against contracting COVID.

That was only about _contracting_ COVID, not what happens to you after you add COVID to your existing lung disease.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tfletch1](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tfletch1/32/5340_2.png) [@Tfletch1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tfletch1)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 1:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/763 "2021-03-09T01:49:14Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> But note that smoking (which burns the cilia off) has not been shown to be a risk factor for contracting COVID.

I think those early studies (out of France and China) have been questioned.  
[https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/497177-suggestion-that-smoking-protects-from-covid-19-may-be-dangerous-to-public](https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/497177-suggestion-that-smoking-protects-from-covid-19-may-be-dangerous-to-public)

And it’s well-known that smoking increases the the risk of developing symptomatic disease and disease progression

> **[Current smoking and COVID-19 risk: results from a population symptom app in...](https://thorax.bmj.com/content/76/7/714)**
>
> Background The association between current tobacco smoking, the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 and the severity of illness is an important information gap.
> 
> Methods UK users of the Zoe COVID-19 Symptom Study app provided baseline data...

[Association of Smoking and Cumulative Pack-Year Exposure With COVID-19 Outcomes in the Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 Registry | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2775677#:~:text=Patients%20who%20smoked%20more%20than,when%20compared%20with%20never%20smokers).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/764 "2021-03-09T04:35:07Z")

</div>

As always, thank you for the kind words. It has indeed been, at times, a slog. It has been good for me as a personal project; having little else to focus on for the past year it has been an at-least regular task.

I fear it isn’t over, tho. The curve down that we’re seeing isn’t the curve that was described months and months ago for either a vaccination or a herd immunity situation, as far as I can recall.

And I can’t help but think of the strategy employed in the game _Plague, Inc._ where it is better to spread far and wide while being fairly harmless and then mutating into something far swifter and more damaging. America has been at the forefront of providing opportunities for this virus to mutate.

Still, at the moment the news and outlook _is_ mostly good. But as I’ve had to say about nearly every aspect of life for a year now: I guess I’ll just have to wait and see what happens over the next 8-10 weeks.

Again: thank you all for your kind words. The threads are here for and by all of us and for people in the future to see what was happening in a real-time chronological sense. Every post helps create a fuller, more comprehensive picture of our era.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 5:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/765 "2021-03-09T05:05:41Z")

</div>

117,750,924 total cases  
2,612,186 dead  
93,438,021 recovered

In the US:

29,744,652 total cases  
538,628 dead  
20,449,634 recovered

Yesterday’s numbers for comparison:

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> 117,449,675 total cases  
> 2,605,347 dead  
> 92,964,137 recovered
> 
> In the US:
> 
> 29,696,250 total cases  
> 537,838 dead  
> 20,336,656 recovered

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/766 "2021-03-09T05:44:13Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> And I can’t help but think of the strategy employed in the game _Plague, Inc._ where it is better to spread far and wide while being fairly harmless and then mutating into something far swifter and more damaging.

I’ve thought about that game a lot since this all started. Especially at the beginning. And when it became clear that New Zealand closed in time. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 10:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/767 "2021-03-09T10:03:25Z")

</div>

Over here in England we are taking the First steps to normality. The schools reopened (with masks and wiping and spreading out).

I hear people on the radio looking forward to festivals and other events in the summer and I can’t help but worry that it will all go horribly wrong,

On the upside, vaccination moves forward impressively and hospital admissions are falling rapidly. They are scheduling non-Covid treatment in an effort to tackle the huge backlog. How many people died because High dependency beds were all taken by Covid sufferers?

In the meantime, we are staying put; masks are still obligatory in shops etc and travel is discouraged.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/768 "2021-03-09T20:02:58Z")

</div>

> [@Melbourne](#):
>
> In the last year, more research has been done on masks than was done in the previous 50 years, and we’re still in the dark ages of ignorance.

While I agree with the above quote, the linked study has some major problems and is still a pre-print (which is true of a large number of COVID-19 related research projects). This really isn’t the proper thread to dive into this, so I’ll not do a point by point rebuttal, but I personally wouldn’t take that study into account in my mask purchasing decisions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/769 "2021-03-09T20:31:39Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> While I agree with the above quote, the linked study has some major problems and is still a pre-print (which is true of a large number of COVID-19 related research projects). This really isn’t the proper thread to dive into this, so I’ll not do a point by point rebuttal, but I personally wouldn’t take that study into account in my mask purchasing decisions.

While nobody is suggesting taking that study as a guide for mask selection, and it has already attracted rebuttal, I observe that it is already published (on the journal’s open access web site), and has already attracted 8 citations. From January all Cell Press journals have had an open access publishing option.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428/770 "2021-03-09T20:34:52Z")

</div>

It’s published as a letter, not an article. Again, this isn’t the place.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428.md?page=36)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/coronavirus-covid-19-2019-ncov-thread-2021-breaking-news/929428.md?page=38)
