# Could baking soda save the planet?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 29, 2007, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239 "2007-11-29T22:44:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/1 "2007-11-29T22:44:19Z")

</div>

Was reading [this](http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/29/climate.change.soda/index.html) article on CNN and was wondering what the Straightdope is on this technique. Is it viable? Could it scale up? How much would it help?

> [@](#):
>
> ([PopSci.com](http://PopSci.com)) – In recent months, PopSci has covered various scientists’ plans to curb global warming through carbon sequestration, mainly by feeding it to algae to make biofuel, or burying it underground.
> 
> Today, a company called Skyonic announced a novel new system, Skymine, which uses the carbon dioxide emitted from smokestacks to make baking soda. According to Skyonic CEO Joe David Jones, the system will be powered by waste heat from factories, and will produce food-grade baking soda.
> 
> Last year, the utility company Luminant installed a pilot version of the system at its Big Brown Steam Electric Station in Fairfield, Texas.
> 
> There’s still quite a bit of work to be done to make the current system viable on a large scale, but the baking soda idea offers solutions to some of the economic problems posed by other carbon sequestration methods.
> 
> For starters, according to Jones, the stuff can be sold for home or industrial use or buried harmlessly in landfills or abandoned mines.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/2 "2007-11-29T22:52:25Z")

</div>

Sure, until someone accidentally mixes with vinegar. Than all of Earth becomes one huge volcano.  
More seriously, you’d have to store the baking soda well away from any possible acid contamination or the CO[sub]2[/sub] gleefully escapes, defeating the purpose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/3 "2007-11-29T22:54:59Z")

</div>

But other than that it would work and scale up? How much CO2 would we be able to take out of the atmosphere if all or most of our coal fired plants used this technique? What would it cost (probably won’t be able to answer this one, I realize)?

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/4 "2007-11-29T23:24:30Z")

</div>

[Skyonic Corporation](http://www.skyonic.com/whatWeDo.php) developed the SkyMine™ process, and describes it thusly:

> [@](#):
>
> Our feed chemical for the reaction to remove the carbon is sodium hydroxide, which is produced on site as a part of the SkyMine™ process. This reaction to produce sodium hydroxide also produces hydrogen and chlorine as byproducts. These can be sold to market at a profit, not only defraying the cost of CO2 removal, but even generating a profit for the SkyMine™ operators. These chemicals are also “green”; they are produced at low energy and without emitting CO2 (since the heat to drive the process is captured from the heat in the flue gas.

So, they’re probably making NaOH with the [Chloralkali process](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloralkali_process), and bubbling the flue gases through the resulting NaOH solution.  
Making NaOH isn’t free, nor is washing the sort of gas volume that a power plant puts out; but if they say it works…  
They claim the process is [internationally patented](http://www.skyonic.com/theCompany.php), but I’m not finding any ref to Skyonic in the US patent database. Maybe they mean it has an international patent, but not a US patent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarmNPrickly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d78d45/32.png) [@WarmNPrickly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WarmNPrickly)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/5 "2007-11-29T23:51:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]  
More seriously, you’d have to store the baking soda well away from any possible acid contamination or the CO2 gleefully escapes, defeating the purpose.  
[/QUOTE]

In general though, wouldn’t this be fundamentally easier than sequestering the CO[sub]2[/sub] as a liquid/gas?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2007, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/6 "2007-11-29T23:57:38Z")

</div>

And here I thought you were going to say the earth is just a giant refrigerator, so let’s open a giant box of baking soda to put in it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/7 "2007-11-30T00:02:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Christopher]  
In general though, wouldn’t this be fundamentally easier than sequestering the CO[sub]2[/sub] as a liquid/gas?  
[/QUOTE]

Sure, but as solids go, baking soda is quite fluffy and delicate. I suppose you could mix it with lime to make it water-insoluble (similar to the manufacturing of soda-lime glass) and compress it into high-impact bricks, but the more energy you have to use to get into this relatively stable state, the less desirable the whole process becomes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Randy\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ee7513/32.png) [@Randy\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Randy_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/8 "2007-11-30T00:09:34Z")

</div>

IANAScientist, but here’s a former chemistry student’s take on it…

You’ve got to get your cation from somewhere. It looks like their process uses NaCl. So for every two moles of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO[sub]3[/sub]) you produce, you produce one mole of chlorine gas (Cl[sub]2[/sub]). If you’re talking about sequestering enough carbon to make a serious dent, you’re talking about producing a lot of chlroine. Only so much of that can be used for industrial applications, and you’ll quickly run into the problem of what to do with all this chlorine. IIRC, it’s not a good-for-the-environment chemical, so now you’ve got a new problem with a not-fun chemical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JustAnotherGeek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/58f4c7/32.png) [@JustAnotherGeek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JustAnotherGeek)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/9 "2007-11-30T00:10:47Z")

</div>

I suppose that this method will work to sequester CO2 if it means that we no longer produce Baking Soda (NaHCO3) via other means.

If this company is able to produce baking soda from the smoke stacks, great, but… when the baking soda gets used, it releases the CO2 back into the atmosphere. Using NaHCO3 to make, say, breads, you’re using the (delayed) reaction of producing CO2 to lift the bread (give it bubbles). The gas will get into the atmosphere at some point. It’s only really sequestering CO2 if this new process displaces another means of NaHCO3 production that was not also removing CO2 from the air.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarmNPrickly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d78d45/32.png) [@WarmNPrickly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WarmNPrickly)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/10 "2007-11-30T00:21:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Ryan Setzer]  
If you’re talking about sequestering enough carbon to make a serious dent, you’re talking about producing a lot of chlroine.  
[/QUOTE]

I haven’t done any direct thinking on this issue, but my guess is that chlorine is such a high energy compound that there is a good way do reduce it to chloride while producing energy without producing greenhouse gasses. If there were a real excess of chlorine being generated, I have no doubt it would find a use.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bouv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@bouv](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bouv)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/11 "2007-11-30T00:25:20Z")

</div>

Another thing to think about: doesn’t most food-grad baking soda get used for baking than for cleaning/deodorizing? And when it’s used for baking, it undergoes a chemical reaction to make…

Carbon-dioxide! Makes the whole process kinda pointless, doesn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WarmNPrickly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d78d45/32.png) [@WarmNPrickly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WarmNPrickly)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/12 "2007-11-30T00:31:05Z")

</div>

I think, they are talking about depositing the baking soda in the ground for sequestration, rather than baking world record sized pancakes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balthisar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/balthisar/32/2825_2.png) [@Balthisar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balthisar)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/13 "2007-11-30T01:50:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Christopher]  
I think, they are talking about depositing the baking soda in the ground for sequestration, rather than baking world record sized pancakes.  
[/QUOTE]

But why bother to call it “food grade baking soda” rather than just plain old “bicarbonate of soda”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NurseCarmen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/5daacb/32.png) [@NurseCarmen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NurseCarmen)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/14 "2007-11-30T01:56:41Z")

</div>

Imagine if they put the factory in Jersey!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Key\_Lime\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/48db29/32.png) [@Key\_Lime\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Key_Lime_Guy)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/15 "2007-11-30T01:58:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Balthisar]  
But why bother to call it “food grade baking soda” rather than just plain old “bicarbonate of soda”?  
[/QUOTE]

PR lingo: it conveys “harmless” to the non-scientist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malacandra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Malacandra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malacandra)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 11:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/16 "2007-11-30T11:01:40Z")

</div>

This is all very well, but sodium hydrogen carbonate is going to be a nuisance to store, what with solubility and the propensity to release some of its CO[sub]2[/sub] on heating. It would be better if we could come up with some insoluble precipitate instead. Maybe if we bioengineered some kind of marine organism to produce calcium carbonate?  
😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OtakuLoki](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ac8455/32.png) [@OtakuLoki](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OtakuLoki)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 12:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/17 "2007-11-30T12:50:35Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Malacandra]  
This is all very well, but sodium hydrogen carbonate is going to be a nuisance to store, what with solubility and the propensity to release some of its CO[sub]2[/sub] on heating. It would be better if we could come up with some insoluble precipitate instead. Maybe if we bioengineered some kind of marine organism to produce calcium carbonate?  
😉  
[/QUOTE]

While we’re getting out the mad science props, can I make a request? If we’re going to be making frankencritters, can I ask that they be _tasty_ frankencritters? Good for soups, or something…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Solfy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@Solfy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Solfy)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/18 "2007-11-30T14:37:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Christopher]  
I haven’t done any direct thinking on this issue, but my guess is that chlorine is such a high energy compound that there is a good way do reduce it to chloride while producing energy without producing greenhouse gasses. If there were a real excess of chlorine being generated, I have no doubt it would find a use.  
[/QUOTE]

Yes, you could (purely hypothetically, of course) have a chemical plant that makes many metric tons of NaOH and is also one of the leading suppliers of, say, cal hypo, HCl, and a smattering of other chlorinated derivatives. I could imagine such a thing easily.

My problem with the proposed “solution” is the energy expenditure inherent in the whole scheme. I think it would be better to have some sort of solar powered carbon sink. Perhaps something that is attractive enough to be stored out in the open, say in the middle of a forest. Something vertically alligned, to maximize storage space. It could even be used as a sort of wildlife habitat and be self sustaining. . .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_Door](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@Bill\_Door](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_Door)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/19 "2007-11-30T15:00:34Z")

</div>

The sodium hydroxide and chlorine have always been co-products generated by the chloralkali process. You could certainly use the NaOH produced to absorb carbon dioxide. The trouble is, that at least right now, the cost of NaOH has gone crazy. The reduction in chlorine usage by the pulp and paper industry has driven down the supply of NaOH, because if you can’t sell the Cl2 to make a profit, you have trouble making a living on the NaOH alone. In fact, the demand for Cl2 is what drives the price of NaOH, the price of NaOH is pretty inelastic as regards to demand.

I don’t know if the current market demand for chlorine is going to support the large scale implementation of this process. In this I think it’s like a lot of environmental remediation schemes. For the first people to use offsets to eliminate their carbon footprint it’s pretty easy. As more and more people do it, the offsets are harder and harder to produce, and more expensive to buy. There’s a limit to how much land we can use for growing trees, and what do you do with the trees when they’ve grown?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Solfy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/848f3c/32.png) [@Solfy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Solfy)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2007, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239/20 "2007-11-30T15:51:21Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bill Door]  
As more and more people do it, the offsets are harder and harder to produce, and more expensive to buy. There’s a limit to how much land we can use for growing trees, and what do you do with the trees when they’ve grown?  
[/QUOTE]

Stack them in the storage space you were going to use for giant baking soda bricks.

While I’m not proposing building new forests, I think stopping massive deforestation would be a good start. But, you argue, those areas are being cleared to provide more farmland. Then we need better farming practices. Oh, but those “better” farming practices use genetially modifed plants and hazardous chemical fertilizers and pesticies.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-baking-soda-save-the-planet/428239.md?page=2)
