# Could the Axis Powers have won WWII?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [August 8, 2012, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891 "2012-08-08T19:05:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/askance/32/8281_2.png) [@Askance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askance)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 1:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/21 "2012-08-09T01:54:38Z")

</div>

> [@chargerrich](#):
>
> I think most historians agree that their were some pretty big blunders made by the Axis powers during WWII and I have often heard and/or read people speculating on the possibility of the Axis powers actually winning (not to mention the extreme differences the world of today would see) if not for some bad decisions.

It’s fun to speculate, but the short answer is “no”. The Allies made some pretty big blunders too, the difference being that their industrial and manpower base were so huge that they could afford those mistakes - the Axis could afford 0 mistakes, and probably still couldn’t have won.

> [@](#):
>
> However even factoring in Germany’s ill advised push into Russia (along with not keeping a Russian alliance)

Ill-advised it may have been, but attacking the USSR was Hitler’s entire purpose in the war. Everything else prior was more or less clearing the decks for that.

> [@](#):
>
> I still do not see any way short of America not participating that the Axis could have won.

America not participating just means the Russians beat Germany on their own, maybe a year later. Italy collapses accordingly, and Japan never goes to war. No more Axis.

> [@Lukeinva](#):
>
> German machine guns on the beaches got so hot that the barrels had to be replaced and this gave the allies time to advance to the dunes and make it a fair fight. Which of course they eventually won. Had they not over heated like that, and also if the Germans had their Panzers in Normandy the invasion just might have failed.
> 
> Don’t know if that means the Axis would’ve ultimately prevailed but they sure would’ve had a better chance. At least until nuclear weapons came on the scene.

Trivial tactical stuff like this makes no difference to the overall result. The Germans were already beaten before Overlord. They were already beaten before Husky (Sicily) in 1943. Defeat was close to inevitable from 22 July 1941.

> [@Deeg](#):
>
> Keep in mind that the Allies were moving up the Italian peninsula before D-Day. Even if D-Day had failed the Germans were doomed. The war would have lasted a few more months and there may have been no West Germany but they were still doomed.

The Italian campaign was a distraction for both sides, and on balance probably made no appreciable difference to the timing of Germany’s defeat.

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> Hitler’s blunders were too numerous to list here, but one of them was declaring war on the US after the attack on Pearl Harbor. He didn’t have to, notwithstanding his treaty with Imperial Japan. Had he not, the US would’ve focused on the Pacific and the Nazis could’ve strengthened their grip on Europe.

By Pearl Harbor the Germans had already been repulsed from Moscow and Leningrad, and what minuscule chance they’d had to defeat Russia was already gone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_diego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7bcc69/32.png) [@the\_diego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/the_diego)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/22 "2012-08-09T01:55:49Z")

</div>

They could have forced a cold war extending up to the 90s?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 2:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/23 "2012-08-09T02:16:45Z")

</div>

No. Unless they didnt attack either Russia or the USA.

In fact attacking the USA was simply suicide.

Russia? Maybe, if Stalin had panicked in the early days or there was a general revolt , or the Nazis were a LOT smarter and luckier than they were.

But mind you, this is from 100% hindsight. At the time, up until the final days on both fronts, it seemed possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/24 "2012-08-09T02:19:05Z")

</div>

> [@Askance](#):
>
> Ill-advised it may have been, but attacking the USSR was Hitler’s entire purpose in the war. Everything else prior was more or less clearing the decks for that.  
> America not participating just means the Russians beat Germany on their own, maybe a year later. Italy collapses accordingly, and Japan never goes to war. No more Axis.
> 
> By Pearl Harbor the Germans had already been repulsed from Moscow and Leningrad, and what minuscule chance they’d had to defeat Russia was already gone.

I have played this out, and the Axis have a chance if they get really lucky, the Russians are really stupid and/or the Axis actually acts like real allies and Japan attacks Russia from the rear.

All of which are unlikely, but still possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/25 "2012-08-09T02:28:41Z")

</div>

> [@Clark\_Cello](#):
>
> As someone said, it depends what you mean by “Win”. If Hitler had not invaded Russia, it would have been awfully hard to kick the Germans out of most of Europe. At the time of D-Day, well over half of Axis troops were on the Eastern Front. I think they would have been able to repell it pretty easily with an extra million troops available to them.
> 
> …
> 
> Back to the “No Russia” scenario. Churchill would have kept up the fight for as long as he could, but I suspect Germany would have eventually found a way to settle with the Allies, keeping a large part of Europe in the prcess. Having said that, it wasn’t going to happen. It isn’t as easy as telling Hitler “Don’t invade Russia”. If you have Stalin and Hitler looking across at each other, you will eventually have war.

With either the US or the USSR in the war, Germany couldn’t ever win. Both had too great a superiority of population and resources. As long as they were determined to win, they would have ground Germany down over the long haul.

However, one possible way Germany could have held on to most of their conquests in Europe, at least for a while, is the “no Hitler” scenario. If Hitler had died or been assassinated early in the war, before the invasion of Russia, a more pragmatic and less ideological leadership - Goring perhaps - might have attempted to consolidate their gains before trying further expansion. Although Germany wasn’t close to an A-bomb by 1945, given more time they might have succeeded. And without the war to spur the US into the Manhattan project, they might have beat the US to it.

In the Pacific the US might have gone to war even without Pearl Harbor. But without that motivation, the US might not have been committed enough to force them out of most of their conquests.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 2:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/26 "2012-08-09T02:45:07Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> However, one possible way Germany could have held on to most of their conquests in Europe, at least for a while, is the “no Hitler” scenario. If Hitler had died or been assassinated early in the war, before the invasion of Russia, a more pragmatic and less ideological leadership - Goring perhaps - might have attempted to consolidate their gains before trying further expansion..

Right. If the new Nazis had offered up everything that wasnt fairly recently part of Germany back (keeping the Rhineland, Sudatenland, etc) it might have been a sell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clark\_Cello](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58f4c7/32.png) [@Clark\_Cello](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clark_Cello)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 2:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/27 "2012-08-09T02:59:17Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> With either the US or the USSR in the war, Germany couldn’t ever win. Both had too great a superiority of population and resources. As long as they were determined to win, they would have ground Germany down over the long haul.
> 
> However, one possible way Germany could have held on to most of their conquests in Europe, at least for a while, is the “no Hitler” scenario. If Hitler had died or been assassinated early in the war, before the invasion of Russia, a more pragmatic and less ideological leadership - Goring perhaps - might have attempted to consolidate their gains before trying further expansion. Although Germany wasn’t close to an A-bomb by 1945, given more time they might have succeeded. And without the war to spur the US into the Manhattan project, they might have beat the US to it.

I don’t necessarily disagree with any of this, but I wonder if there would have been the will on the Allies side if Russia wasn’t involved. If that is the case, then you basically have a fait acomplit on the continent. Germany has most of it, and there is no fighting going on. Making a landing without the Russian front as a distraction is very, very hard, and will take a lot of blood. I think it is possible, though maybe not probable, that Germany can just hang on to it long enough that no one has the will to take it from them, even if they can.

Similarly, when talking about the A-bomb, I don’t know if the US uses it if there isn’t any real fighting going on. Maybe they do, I am far from an expert on that part of the war, but dropping an A-bomb on a city when you haven’t had any real casualties is much different than doing it when you are being bled with every single island you take.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/28 "2012-08-09T03:07:07Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> The Italians? Perhaps they might have…actually I dunno what they could have done.

Italy’s big problem was they peaked too early. Mussolini took power in 1922 and began a major military program. The Italian government invested a significant portion of the national budget on developing new weapons, building up its military arsenal, and recruiting and training new soldiers. Around 1929, Italy was one of the strongest military powers in Europe.

The problem was that there was no war in 1929. Hitler took power in 1932 and began rebuilding the German military through the thirties. France, the UK, and the Soviet Union all saw this and began building up their militaries as well. Italy’s military meanwhile just got older. By 1939, every other European power had a new military that had been built up in the last five years or so. Italy had a military that was based around fifteen year old technology.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 3:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/29 "2012-08-09T03:50:01Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> In the Pacific the US might have gone to war even without Pearl Harbor. But without that motivation, the US might not have been committed enough to force them out of most of their conquests.

Japan and the US were coming closer and closer to war. Had the Japanese not hit Pearl Harbor, the US fleet would have been committed earlier into fighting sooner. I think it would have gotten there no matter what. And once they’re shooting at each other, things have a tendency to escalate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/30 "2012-08-09T03:56:55Z")

</div>

> [@Clark\_Cello](#):
>
> I don’t necessarily disagree with any of this, but I wonder if there would have been the will on the Allies side if Russia wasn’t involved. If that is the case, then you basically have a fait acomplit on the continent. Germany has most of it, and there is no fighting going on. Making a landing without the Russian front as a distraction is very, very hard, and will take a lot of blood. I think it is possible, though maybe not probable, that Germany can just hang on to it long enough that no one has the will to take it from them, even if they can.

If you posit a “No Hitler, no Russian invasion, no Pearl Harbor” scenario, then the US most likely doesn’t even get involved, or if it does it isn’t motivated enough to commit enough to dislodge Germany or Japan from most of their conquests.

A Cold War between the US and the Axis ensues for the next 45 years, when a new young Fuhrer announces a new era of openness and political reform. Protests spread in the captive nations and the Reich no longer has the will to put them down. The Nazi Empire swiftly unravels and a new era begins. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/31 "2012-08-09T04:03:15Z")

</div>

> [@TokyoBayer](#):
>
> Japan and the US were coming closer and closer to war. Had the Japanese not hit Pearl Harbor, the US fleet would have been committed earlier into fighting sooner. I think it would have gotten there no matter what. And once they’re shooting at each other, things have a tendency to escalate.

Perhaps, but say Japan doesn’t try to take the Philippines or any other US possessions. It just limits itself to gobbling up China and the colonies of the European countries conquered by Germany. How much effort would the US have put into trying to win back the colonies of other countries?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![etv78](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/d78d45/32.png) [@etv78](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/etv78)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 4:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/32 "2012-08-09T04:03:59Z")

</div>

> [@beowulff](#):
>
> No.  
> Once the US got the atomic bomb, there was no way that Germany would have been able to maintain any kind of industrial base.

Germany was the original target for the bombs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![etv78](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/d78d45/32.png) [@etv78](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/etv78)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 4:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/33 "2012-08-09T04:08:53Z")

</div>

WRT Germany’s nuclear program:Is it correct to say that Einstein figured _someone_ was going to get the bomb and it should be the good guys.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 4:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/34 "2012-08-09T04:39:14Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Perhaps, but say Japan doesn’t try to take the Philippines or any other US possessions. It just limits itself to gobbling up China and the colonies of the European countries conquered by Germany. How much effort would the US have put into trying to win back the colonies of other countries?

Given the state of the “We wont be fooled again” non-interventionism of the majority of US voters- the USA would open it’s pocketbooks to some extent. That’s about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/35 "2012-08-09T04:43:30Z")

</div>

> [@beowulff](#):
>
> No.  
> Once the US got the atomic bomb, there was no way that Germany would have been able to maintain any kind of industrial base.

I don’t know about that. German industry quite successfully decentralized in response to Allied bombing campaigns, to the point that industrial production didn’t actually fall until actual German land started being captured. The greater significance of the campaign was that it drew out the Luftwaffe, destroying planes and killing experienced pilots. Perhaps atomic bombing would have been more effective, but the conventional bombing campaign was quite devastating and yet had little effect on industry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 5:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/36 "2012-08-09T05:01:10Z")

</div>

> [@medicated](#):
>
> The German nuclear program never really went anywhere. There’s no chance they’d have developed it before the US unless Roosevelt had nixed the entire project before it started.

One big reason was the original blunder of using antisemitism and to prosecute people with liberal ideals as the official policy, by 1939 most European nuclear scientists were refugees from Fascism and had gone to work for the allies.

It is true that Einstein did not do work for the nuclear bomb, but his letter to Roosevelt was pointed out as one of the items that convinced the USA of not letting that chance to become a reality. One of the most important refugees was Enrico Fermi, he was not a Jew but his wife was, and thanks to the fascists in Italy becoming more antisemitic like their northern axis partner, he came to the USA and the rest was history.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 9:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/37 "2012-08-09T09:08:49Z")

</div>

The invasion of Russia was doomed by the Nazis’ insane policy of treating all the Russians as _untermenschen_. Many peoples of the Soviet Union would have welcomed them as liberators and enthusiastically joined in the battle against Stalin otherwise. It’s certainly feasible that such a policy would have led to a friendly government ruling Russia and a good chance of fighting the remaining Allies to a stalemate. (I think victory would have been out of the question, the US was just too strong).

Fortunately there was zero chance that Hitler, crazed ideologue that he was, would have adopted such a rational policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shakester](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/shakester/32/437_2.png) [@Shakester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shakester)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 12:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/38 "2012-08-09T12:34:26Z")

</div>

A scenario that isn’t often raised is: what if Hitler had stuck to fighting his real enemy, the Soviet Union?

Germans (since the formation of “Germany” as a nation) had _one_ idea when it came to war: knock the western allies (France and the UK, mainly) out of the battle before turning around to pillage the Russian Empire / the USSR. That was the Kaiser’s strategy in WW1, it was Hitler’s in WW2.

But what if Hitler had done his best to placate France / the UK and assured them that his real enemy was Stalin? Which, besides anything else, was actually _true_.

Now, the French/British alliance had guaranteed Poland’s safety, which is pretty inconvenient if you’re Germany and you want to attack the USSR. But let’s handwave a situation whereby Nazi Germany could attack the USSR without going through anything the French/Brits cared too much about. Would the situation of Nazis clobbering Bolsheviks really drag the west into what would unquestionably be a long a bloody war?

I can imagine a wait-and-see strategy, possibly even the classic “let my enemies destroy each other and then sail in to mop up the tattered survivors”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 1:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/39 "2012-08-09T13:06:16Z")

</div>

> [@Shakester](#):
>
> A scenario that isn’t often raised is: what if Hitler had stuck to fighting his real enemy, the Soviet Union?
> 
> Germans (since the formation of “Germany” as a nation) had _one_ idea when it came to war: knock the western allies (France and the UK, mainly) out of the battle before turning around to pillage the Russian Empire / the USSR. That was the Kaiser’s strategy in WW1, it was Hitler’s in WW2.
> 
> But what if Hitler had done his best to placate France / the UK and assured them that his real enemy was Stalin? Which, besides anything else, was actually _true_.
> 
> Now, the French/British alliance had guaranteed Poland’s safety, which is pretty inconvenient if you’re Germany and you want to attack the USSR. But let’s handwave a situation whereby Nazi Germany could attack the USSR without going through anything the French/Brits cared too much about. Would the situation of Nazis clobbering Bolsheviks really drag the west into what would unquestionably be a long a bloody war?
> 
> I can imagine a wait-and-see strategy, possibly even the classic “let my enemies destroy each other and then sail in to mop up the tattered survivors”.

Hitlers attack on the West was quickly victorious and gained him a lot. Other than the Battle Of Britian, the net increase was large and without those factories etc, i dont think the German army would have been up to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2012, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891/40 "2012-08-09T13:10:44Z")

</div>

> [@GreasyJack](#):
>
> I don’t know about that. German industry quite successfully decentralized in response to Allied bombing campaigns, to the point that industrial production didn’t actually fall until actual German land started being captured. The greater significance of the campaign was that it drew out the Luftwaffe, destroying planes and killing experienced pilots. Perhaps atomic bombing would have been more effective, but the conventional bombing campaign was quite devastating and yet had little effect on industry.

It is true that German war production was actually on the increase. But this ignores a few key facts:  
-Germany had almost no reserves of aviation fuel-all those fighter planes were worthless without gasoline. After the loss of Rumanian oilfields, the Germans had to rely on synthetic fuel-which was expensive to produce and of limited capacity.  
-Germany was running out of trained pilots and experienced soldiers. So many of the best Luftwaffe pilots had been killed in Russia, that rookie pilots (often with only a few hours flying experience) were pressed into combat-these green pilots were fodder for experienced allied pilots.  
-the so-called “wonder weapons” (V-1 and V-2 missiles) were produced at tremendous cost (using slave labor); neither weapon was worth the expense of production-most V-2s blew up on the launch pad or went off course.  
The allied air attacks were shutting down the German transit system-you cold make tanks, but you couldn’t move them from the factories. In any case, there were not enough trained soldiers to man them-16 year old “Hitlerjugend” were no match for allied veterans.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-axis-powers-have-won-wwii/630891.md?page=3)
