# Could the President of the United States get a second job while in office?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 29, 2022, 7:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654 "2022-04-29T07:05:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Asuka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@Asuka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Asuka)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 7:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/1 "2022-04-29T07:05:19Z")

</div>

And by job I don’t mean largely passive income like owning a business or being on the board of some company. Not anything he could do while still sitting in the Oval Office.

I literally mean, could the President of the United States decided he wants to work at a local McDonald’s either part time or full time, or slightly more realistically, could he be a surgeon working a few hours a day at a local hospital?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![penultima\_thule](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/penultima_thule/32/3833_2.png) [@penultima\_thule](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/penultima_thule)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/2 "2022-04-29T09:09:35Z")

</div>

His security detail might severely impinge on POTUS interacting with Joe Public and crimp available parking for patrons in the precinct

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blalron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/35a633/32.png) [@Blalron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blalron)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/3 "2022-04-29T09:52:55Z")

</div>

There would be serious security concerns about the President working at a McDonald’s. The Secret Service would very strongly urge him not to do that. They would have to install metal detectors at the doors.

Then there’s the practical issue of whether the franchise owner or McDonald’s Corporation would simply refuse to hire him, fearing that it would be a liability for them if any tragedy happened.

Assuming those obstacles are overcome, I think the safest place for the President to work would be in the kitchen area, certainly not as a service worker taking orders at the drive thru or front counter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 11:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/4 "2022-04-29T11:51:04Z")

</div>

I’m picturing trump in overalls pushing a lawnmower around the district.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/5 "2022-04-29T12:05:35Z")

</div>

Jerry Seinfeld visited President Obama at the White House for his Comedians/Coffee/Cars show. With Obama behind the wheel, they jokingly went to leave for a spin around DC, but were stopped at the gate with a stern “No” by security. The President is surrounded by security apparatus 24/7/365, any venture out in public probably takes some amount of planning, so I imagine taking a random job outside that controlled apparatus would be a hard “No” again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tofor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tofor/32/13727_2.png) [@tofor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tofor)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/6 "2022-04-29T12:20:31Z")

</div>

That was a joke though. The president’s security detail is there to serve him and can’t actually prevent the president from leaving if he wants to overrule them.

I do not think there is any rule or law that would prevent a duly elected president from deciding to be a part-time president and moonlight as a physician.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/7 "2022-04-29T12:24:06Z")

</div>

> [@tofor](#):
>
> I do not think there is any rule or law that would prevent a duly elected president from deciding to be a part-time president and moonlight as a physician.

Isn’t there an assumption that the President should do his or her job? This is like asking if the President could play video games all day. Of course not; they would be booted pretty quickly for gross incompetence, not discharging duties, etc.

Now if they were genetically engineered not to have to sleep at all, perhaps they could squeeze in some free time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/8 "2022-04-29T12:31:47Z")

</div>

Well, sure on all the above, but it so happens, that strictly speaking as we have all been recently reminded, there are surprisingly few actual “hard” legal mandates on what the President cannot do outside of his office duties – or even on how he performs those – as opposed to practical limitations, reasonable expectations, “accepted understandings” and/or “this is how all the other guys did it”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![burpo\_the\_wonder\_mutt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/burpo_the_wonder_mutt/32/365_2.png) [@burpo\_the\_wonder\_mutt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/burpo_the_wonder_mutt)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/9 "2022-04-29T12:33:17Z")

</div>

> [@kayaker](#):
>
> I’m picturing trump in overalls pushing a lawnmower around the district.

You mean orange coveralls with “DOJ” stenciled on the back, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/10 "2022-04-29T12:38:42Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Isn’t there an assumption that the President should do his or her job? This is like asking if the President could play video games all day.

An assumption, sure, but a mandate or law? Not really.

And I’m sure the Secret Service would rather them playing video games in the Oval Office than working the counter at McDonald’s.

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Of course not; they would be booted pretty quickly for gross incompetence, not discharging duties, etc.

By who?

I think it would be a bad idea, for a whole host of reasons, for the president to have a job other than presidenting, but if they really want to, there’s not much stopping them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/11 "2022-04-29T12:40:11Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Isn’t there an assumption that the President should do his or her job? This is like asking if the President could play video games all day. Of course not; they would be booted pretty quickly for gross incompetence, not discharging duties, etc.

Trump’s “Executive time” nonsense suggests that exactly this could happen.

And hey, as long as there’s a decent cabinet to do the actual work, how much does the President actually _have_ to do? I suppose there’s a certain minimum amount of signing things like the budget bills that is essential, but if the President just didn’t care about everything else, a lot of it could just slide. I suspect that, so long as the bills are paid, the machinery of government would get along pretty well for years without a hands-on President in office.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/12 "2022-04-29T12:53:45Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Isn’t there an assumption that the President should do his or her job? This is like asking if the President could play video games all day. Of course not; they would be booted pretty quickly for gross incompetence, not discharging duties, etc.

Unless the opposing party holds the House and a two thirds majority in the Senate, it is impossible to give the President “the boot”, even for gross incompetence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/13 "2022-04-29T12:54:27Z")

</div>

> [@kayaker](#):
>
> I’m picturing trump in overalls

Here ya go!

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/SCkmOCsI-hc/hqdefault.jpg "Green Acres") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCkmOCsI-hc)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 12:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/14 "2022-04-29T12:54:32Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> > [@DPRK](#):
> >
> > Of course not; they would be booted pretty quickly for gross incompetence, not discharging duties, etc.
> 
> By who?

Their cabinet, their own party, the Congress. Who else? Fucking up is a political problem, not a crime.

> [@Fear\_Itself](#):
>
> Unless the opposing party holds the House and a two thirds majority in the Senate, it is impossible to give the President “the boot”, even for gross incompetence.

If, under this hypothetical, the president continues to enjoy support then you are right, however not coming to the office means they are not even taking care of their own corrupt partisan interests.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 1:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/15 "2022-04-29T13:02:12Z")

</div>

Federal employees are generally allowed to hold a second job, subject to numerous caveats and a broad requirement that it not “conflict with their official duties.” I don’t know whether the President could be held to the same standards.

[Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch](https://www.oge.gov/web/OGE.nsf/0/A8ECD9020E3E384C8525873C0046575D/%24FILE/SOC%20as%20of%2085%20FR%2036715%20FINAL.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/16 "2022-04-29T13:56:01Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Their cabinet, their own party, the Congress. Who else?

Well, no one else, you named the only ones who could, Congress. And that means getting an impeachment and a conviction, literally on mopery.

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Fucking up is a political problem, not a crime.

Right, which is why it would be hard to justify impeachment under Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. While impeachment is a political process, and they could technically impeach a president for eating tacos on a Wednesday, it is supposed to be used for when they have committed a crime, which you just said these acts would not be.

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> If, under this hypothetical, the president continues to enjoy support then you are right, however not coming to the office means they are not even taking care of their own corrupt partisan interests.

If they show up once a week and sign whatever bills have made it to their desk, there is no one in congress that will care.

The cabinet that you mentioned does the day to day work, and while usually the President has a fair amount of involvement with them, he doesn’t have to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KCB615](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ea666f/32.png) [@KCB615](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KCB615)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/17 "2022-04-29T21:14:50Z")

</div>

I think the Emoluments clause was meant to prevent outside employment:

> Article III, Section 1  
> The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/18 "2022-04-29T21:24:06Z")

</div>

> [@KCB615](#):
>
> I think the Emoluments clause was meant to prevent outside employment

But again, Trump pretty much proved the emoluments clause has no teeth, either. If he could make millions off foreign countries renting hotel rooms they never intended to use, Biden can work the grill at McDonalds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bordelond](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bordelond/32/150_2.png) [@bordelond](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bordelond)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/19 "2022-04-29T21:24:18Z")

</div>

Is my memory correct that Barack Obama occasionally wrote and syndicated op-ed articles while he was President?

I’m not sure of the ins and outs there … perhaps those op-eds were ghost-written by speechwriters after getting some rough ideas from Obama. Not sure.

But anyway … that seems to be the kind of side job a President could hypothetically fulfill: producing a weekly or monthly column for syndication. Perhaps still an Emoluments clause violation, however.

EDIT: Just to add that sitting Senators and U.S. Representatives certainly write op-eds for papers in their home states. Louisiana senator John Kennedy is frequently published (well, maybe 5 or 6 a year that I notice). Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) just published one in the New Orleans paper this past Sunday.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2022, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654/20 "2022-04-29T21:25:39Z")

</div>

> [@bordelond](#):
>
> But anyway … that seems to be the kind of side job a President could hypothetically fulfill: producing a weekly or monthly column for syndication.

Not even hypothetical, remember the Fireside chats?

> **[Fireside chats](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireside_chats)**
>
> The fireside chats were a series of evening radio addresses given by Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, between 1933 and 1944. Roosevelt spoke with familiarity to millions of Americans about recovery from the Great Depression, the promulgation of the Emergency Banking Act in response to the banking crisis, the 1936 recession, New Deal initiatives, and the course of World War II. On radio, he quelled rumors, countered conservative-dominated newspapers, and explained ...

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-the-president-of-the-united-states-get-a-second-job-while-in-office/963654.md?page=2)
