Actually I have always blamed Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin for killing Godzilla in that instance They certainly killed the American franchise of it , anyway.
I would have blamed Matthew Broderick as well, but then I realized that he only kills people.
The real answer is, as long as remakes and sequels make money, Godzilla can never be permanently killed.
Sometimes he dies at the box office, only to return even bigger the next time. (Though even the 1998 film was financially successful, with the 9th highest gross in the US and third internationally.)
If the radioactivity is inherent in the organism’s design (I don’t know if it is), it probably also has immunity from it. Snakes don’t die from snakebite (do they?).
You people are overcomplicating this. I have already worked out the fool-proof plan for taking out any giant monster, the SRA plan. Three Points:
S - Submarine (injectable) R - Ripley A - Apple laptop with virus installed
As you can see, no objection can be raised to this plan, because of the square-cube law. That is, as we’ve learned from our most advanced Creation Science, as long as there’s one thing we can’t explain, we can pick and choose among everything else what we want to believe is true because it’s all up in the air. This is why when the zombie apocalypse comes, and the second law of thermodynamics is out the window for some reason, there also stands no impediment to making it rain magic ninja stars that phase through everything but the brains of the undead. Quod erat dēmōnstrandum. mike drop
According to IMDb, it made $136M in the US against a budget of $130M. That’s not financially successful by any measure. Another $240M worldwide means some of the parties just started to get money from it. It just barely made the “three times” rule.
Just because the numbers are enormous doesn’t make it a relative success on the H’weird scale.
Yes, because if I’ve learned anything in my life it is that when fighting giant animals whose main weapons are teeth and claws, what you really want to do is get in close. Rockets and projectiles wont work you see. Big iron fists are what you need! Oh, and don’t forget your sword!
OK we know that if Godzilla were made of real flesh and blood he would be easy to take out with conventional weapons. We also know that if he were flesh and blood he wouldn’t even be able to get out of the water.
But can we use the second violation of science to provide some information from which to calculate the magnitude of the first violation. That is, suppose we assume that Godzilla is made of some unknown pseudo-biological substance that is strong enough that it can support his weight on land and move/crush buildings in spite of the square/cube law. This substance is also heat/radiation resistant enough so that he can breathe radio active fire. What would be the structural requirements of such a substance be, and how would that substance hold up against various forms of attack.
Still not possible to say. We know that this hypothetical kaiju-flesh substance must be very strong, stronger than some lower bound that we could calculate. But we don’t know how much stronger. Maybe it’s strong enough to support a kaiju, and maybe it’s strong enough to withstand an artillery shell, but is it strong enough to do both at once? Only way to find out is to fire artillery at the thing while it’s standing and see.
You might be able to disrupt or destroy his current physical form, but he’d unstoppably regenerate. In the process he might be limited in his ability to drive opium-addicted poets mad for a brief time.
Now, something like Yog-Sothoth, there’s no way we could touch it.