# Could We Revive The Austro-Hungarian Empire?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 21, 2003, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406 "2003-06-21T13:19:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/1 "2003-06-21T13:19:41Z")

</div>

To me, it seems a natural…Spain likes being a kingdom again, and the stabilizing effects of a maonarchy have been good for the UK. So, since the habsburg family still exists, should we revive this mid-european empire?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/2 "2003-06-21T13:47:40Z")

</div>

Who do you mean by “we” and what business is it of yours one way or the other? Are you simultaneously a citizen of Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Austria, Hungary, Germany, Poland, Romania, Moldova, Belarus and Russia? Because all those countries (and some more I’ve probably overlooked) would be directly affected by a recreation of Austria-Hungary and their views seem rather pertinent.

Alliances between most of those countries are already part of the process of European Union membership. Surely if those countries felt a recreation of Austria-Hungary would suit them better they would have suggested it themselves wouldn’t they?

In any case, Spain wasn’t part of Austria-Hungary (there’s a difference between that and the Hapsburg Empire).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/3 "2003-06-21T14:25:48Z")

</div>

Don’t leave out Ukraine. Lviv was once ruled by A.-H.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/4 "2003-06-21T14:33:01Z")

</div>

Interestingly enough-if you wanted to, the man who was the Heir to the Throne at the end of WWI is still alive-Archduke Otto von Hapsburg. Although I think he merely goes by plain Dr. Otto Hapsburg.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freddy\_the\_Pig](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@Freddy\_the\_Pig](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freddy_the_Pig)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/5 "2003-06-21T15:30:03Z")

</div>

Indeed, **Guin** , if only the Hapsburg monarchy had _not_ been abolished, ol’ Otto would have shattered Louis XIV’s record for the longest reign by a European monarch (72 years). Otto would have been on the throne since his father died in 1922, for a reign, to date, of 81 years!

I’m not sure whether the OP envisions restoring the monarchy in Austria itself, or in Austria and Hungary combined, or in the full reach of the former empire. Good luck with the latter. In Vienna, the Hapsburg days may bring to mind images of Lippizaner stallions prancing to the Light Cavalry Overture, but their rule in many of their subject territories was incredibly brutal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/6 "2003-06-21T15:42:22Z")

</div>

Excuse me if my previous post seemed a bit sarcastic, but it just seems like a monumentally dumb idea to me. What would be the purpose of recreating the Austro-Hungarian Empire?

Could “we” do it? No – it’s none of our business. Could “they” do it themselves? Sure – all the countries listed above are democracies after a fashion, so they can do whatever they like as long as they can convince enough of their own people to vote for it.

However, there would have to be years of lobbying, argument back and forth and mountains of paperwork to partially dissolve the European Union, the EFTA area and Nato, rewrite all the current and future plans for expanding the European Union and Nato, redraw numerous national frontiers _yet again_, redraft all the trading and other treaties between the existing (i.e. to be scrapped) countries and the recreated A-H E member countries, arrange for numerous members formally leaving the UN and rejoining again under a new name. Many of the countries in the list above were only _partially within_ the old A-H E, so you’d have to overcome constitutional objections within each of those countries for them to cede territory to reform the Empire.

Take a look at the [CIA World Factbook entry for Austria](http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/au.html), for example, and look at its international organization participation. All those treaties would have to be rewritten to remove Austria and add the A-H E because not all countries forming the A-H E are currently members of the same organisations under the same set of terms. In any case, do you imagine countries like Croatia and Slovenia would welcome being told to reunite again under an ancient umbrella organisation?

And what would be the benefit? Is there currently any instability in countries like Austria or Hungary that would be removed by the external imposition of some monarch nobody there has heard of? Is it just to give some idle aristocrats with unusual jaw lines something to amuse them in the afternoons? Or what?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/7 "2003-06-21T16:02:50Z")

</div>

**ralph 124c** does not suggest his reasons for proposing the restoration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire – but look at the things that have happened to its constituent countries since it broke up! The Ukraine and Poland during WWII . . . more recently, the tragic events in Croatia and Bosnia . . . I could understand how some East-Central Europeans might be nostalgic for the narrow-minded, heavy-handed stability of Habsburg rule. (Habsburg? Hapsburg? I’ve seen it spelled both ways – does anybody know how they pronounce it?) Of course it won’t happen. You might as well talk about restoring the empire of Charlemagne.

Does it matter? The European Union looks like it will provide Europe with all the peace and stability it needs. Former Soviet-bloc nations are clamoring to get in, and once things calm down in the former Yugoslavia and wounds have a chance to heal, I expect Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, Montenegro and Macedonia will also join the EU. (Slovenia has already applied for membership.) Maybe, one day, even Russia will join. And then there will be peace and free trade among these countries for as long as the EU holds together. What dynastic empire could do more?

By the way – I happen to be a great fan of the late sf-and-fantasy writer Avram Davidson. One of his most famous series of connected short stories was about Dr. Engelbert Eszterhazy, a figure like Sherlock Holmes only more intellectual, aristocratic and mystical, living in the late-19th-early-20th century in the “Triune Monarchy of Scythia-Pannonia-Transbalkania.” If you’re interested in the A-H. E., you might want to check out his collection, _The Adventures of Dr. Eszterhazy._ Or check out the Avram Davidson website, [www.avramdavidson.org](http://www.avramdavidson.org) .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dragonstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e79b87/32.png) [@Dragonstar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dragonstar)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/8 "2003-06-21T16:32:02Z")

</div>

Yeah, remember those Lippizaner stallions prancing through Vienna; they’re from Lipica, Slovenia, not too far North of the current border with Italy. I know this, as I’ve visited the stud farm.

Under Hapsburg rule, everyone was forced to speak German; all education was conducted in German. Not until Slovenia was Napoleon’s Illyrian province was schooling ever conducted in Slovene. I know this from the tour guide on the Plechnik tour in Ljubljana. Plecknik was an architect and, among other things, designed a Napoleon memorial.

Schoolchildren began their day singing a song in praise of the Hapsburg Emperor. This is based on anecdotal evidence from my great-grandmother who was a schoolchild, who sang the song. In German.

I was last in Slovenia in 1988, two years before the breakup of Yugoslavia. There was a lot of separatist talk, and my parents were encouraged to stop me from going…I found that out after I came home.

In my opinion, the original formation of Yugoslavia, which was first a monarchy, was a bad idea from the get-go. Take 6 (or 8 because there were two independent areas within Serbia) bits of land with different ethnic peoples, throw in three religions, and a lot of historical conflict and you’ve got a recipe for trouble. No big surprise that the monarchy didn’t last long. Add a Communist government, Socialist economy, and Capitalist population and you’ve got a recipe for disaster. The one great thing about Tito was that he straddled the fence, so there was more freedom in Y than I understand there was in the Iron Curtain nations. Also, with the Dalmatian coast (Dalmatia is the coastal part of Croatia), they would have lost a lot of tourism $.

If you look at the history of the area, Slovenia and Croatia had been part of the Industrial Revolution, had more education (both more schools and more who atteneded them) and had more natural resources. Other states were part of the Ottoman empire (Turkish), or independent, and placed less value on education, had fewer schools, and fewer natural resources. They also have fewer factories.

As a result, there were a lot more jobs in Slovenia and Croatia. Also, a lot of workers historically went to Austria and Germany as guest workers; once Germany reunited, those workers were sent home, creating unemployment in Yugoslavia (also Turkey). In my opinion that was the biggest factor in the breakup of the country.

Slovenia and Croatia created 85% of the GNP (from a schoolfriend whose father was an economist), but the funding was all sent through Serbia and while S & C both spent money on things like factories and schools, other states would build monuments and not worry about education.

The troubles in the Balkans have a long history, and if you recall, the Hapsburg empire was broken up after Gavril Princip assassinated the archduke and his wife, starting WWI. Putting the empire back together wouldn’t fix anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/9 "2003-06-21T17:52:39Z")

</div>

Think of the good things:  
-fancy dress uniforms  
-dress balls at the Imperial Palacein Vienna  
-Strauss waltzes  
-ceremony  
The new A-H Empire need not be repressive; it could be a kind of “monarchy lite” (such as Denmark and Sweden now enjoy)!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/10 "2003-06-21T18:05:50Z")

</div>

The monarchy in Yugoslavia was the monarchy of Serbia-the Croats and Slovenes definitely had more incommon with the Serbs than they did the Austrians and Hungarians. Of course, it didn’t and still doesn’t stop all the fighting, sadly.

Another interesting tidbit-the last Emperor, Karl I, is up for sainthood. Another of his sons, Archduke Rudolf, was at my aunt’s church not too long ago talking about this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/11 "2003-06-21T18:29:55Z")

</div>

A representative passage from “Writ in Water, or the Gingerbread Man,” by Avram Davidson, collected in _The Adventures of Dr. Eszterhazy,_ (Philadelphia: Owlswick Press, 1990):

> [@](#):
>
> The Scotch had not conquered the English nor had the English conquered the Scotch in order for one sovereign to become King of England and King of Scotland and – eventually – King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain. What had brought it about was, firstly, the Scottish marriage of King Henry’s sister, and, secondly, the not-marriage of King Henry’s daughter: _The Queen of Scots hath a bonny babe and I am but a barren stock._ Neither had any wars at last united Scythia or Pannonia; the Pannonians at a certain point historical had no Crown-Prince? Well, neither had they any Salic Law; the then-Crown-Prince of Scythia was wedded to the then-Crown-Princess of Pannonia; both being tactful enough to die before their conjoint-grandchild, said grandchild became Sovereign of both Scythia _and_ Pannonia – and what school-child anywhere did not know that the people of Scythia were (principally) Goths and that the people of Pannonia were (principally) Avars? _What_ an occasion for the erasure of frontiers, the unification of armies, the abolition of customs and octrois! There were, however, also all those lesser, minor territories, of which the new Sovereign was Prince of one and Duke of another . . . in the Scythian Line of Descent . . . Grand Hetman here and Chief Boyar there . . . in the Pannonian Line of Descent . . . and so on . . . and so on . . .
> 
> What to do about them, these not-quite-nations already becoming obsolete in an age where every political entity was felt to require a prime minister, a general staff, a set of postage stamps, a – What was done was perhaps cleverer than students of political science realized, for all these “Hegemonies,” as they were called, from Ritchli to Little Great Dombrovia to Hyperborea, and including Vlox-Majore and Vlox-Minore, were not absorbed by either Scythia or Pannonia, but were autonomously united to form _Transbalkania._
> 
> And now the cheese of Poposhki, the smoked sturgeon of the Romanou, the brined-pork and the brawn of the Slovatchko Alps, appeared . . . _untaxed!_ . . . on the market-stalls of Bella – Avar-Ister – Apollograd – and everywhere else in the fourth-largest empire in Europe. (The Turks were only fifth. Served them right.) Also the wheat of Scythia, and the beef and mutton of the wide Pannonian plains. And, as Dr. Engelbert Eszterhazy composed this paean in his own mind and looked at the ever-thronging streets of what, once a walled town, was now a world capital (yes, it was a small world), he considered the role which he himself would play. Which he had intended he should play and had designed (and re-designed) his own life the better to play it. You can’t catch me, said –

And, from “The Autogondola Invention,” same collection:

> [@](#):
>
> Incomparably less large and vast than the Russian Empire, incomparably less powerful than the German Empire, incomparably less sophisticated than the Austro-Hungarian Empire – still Scythia-Pannonia-Transbalkania, its mere name a subject for risibility elsewhere, was _his_ empire, his native land. It may not have functioned very well? so much the more was he pleased that it functioned at all. Its Secret Police was a joke? so much the more he too would enjoy the joke; no one laughed at the Secret Polices in the other empires. Its many languages rivaled Babel or Pentecost? let them: at least here no schoolboy was flogged for praying in whatsoever minor mother toungue. One empire had already, fairly recently, gone from the political map of Europe; and although the name of Bonaparte still rang like a tocsin here and there, it was uncertain that the Prince Imperial would himself ever ring it successfully.
> 
> Day by day others asked, how fared their country’s wheat compared with Russian wheat, its butter with Danish butter, its timber with Carpathian timber, its tar with Baltic tar, its cloth with English cloth? Day by day the same spokes of the universal wheel flashed by: love, sorrow, terror, death, success, failure, hunger, joy, growth, decay, weakness, strength: the wheel turned and turned and turned: nothing stayed the same, no one bathed twice in the same flowing water for the water had flowed on and flowed away. _There is no star at the pole of the universe,_ young Dr. Eszterhazy recollected the ancient astronomer; and if there was and long had been but blankness in the comparable area of his own country, then might there not be a space and place for him? What he hoped for, others did not even think of; what others did not think, might he not think of?
> 
> And after thinking, do?

As you will see, these stories are really about the A-H E. as it **should** have been.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/12 "2003-06-21T19:21:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by ralph124c \*  
> \*\*Think of the good things:  
> -fancy dress uniforms  
> -dress balls at the Imperial Palacein Vienna  
> -Strauss waltzes  
> -ceremony  
> The new A-H Empire need not be repressive; it could be a kind of “monarchy lite” (such as Denmark and Sweden now enjoy)! \*\*

So on the down side we’d have an organisational nightmare slightly less difficult to arrange than a mass streak across the Sea of Tranquillity, but on the up side we’d have the occasional upmarket fancy dress party? Hmm. I’m sure they’d appreciate your sentiments, but the thing about a government is that it’s there to govern, not to wear jewellery.

You do know we already have that stuff all over Europe as it is don’t you? I’m sure I could send you some brochures.

How 'bout we forget about whole pan-national monarchy thing and you light some candles, have yourself a nice scented bath and rent a copy of [_The Slipper and the Rose_](http://us.imdb.com/Title?0075232)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/13 "2003-06-21T19:28:03Z")

</div>

BTW, of the countries that have the best chance of regaining their monarchies, I believe Serbia is supposed to top the list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/14 "2003-06-21T19:39:24Z")

</div>

Nitpick: I was under the impression that Otto von Habsburg died a few years ago (but would still have the European longevity record) – anyone want to bother Googling to check this out?)

Otto himself is/was a very interesting figure. He appears to have been the smartest Habsburg in history, not excluding historical figures like Joseph II and Philip II. He worked for years towards European unification, and was IIRC quite firm on the idea of nationalities keeping their independent ethnicity but working together for common defense, economy, etc. (A lesson learned from his ancestors’ mistakes!)

Under Franz Josef (Karl was only on the throne for two years during WWI, and had no opportunity to accomplish much), the domination of the Empire by the Austrian Germanic elite and the Hungarian Magyar elite was pretty well accepted. This was the main reason for Bohemia, Slovakia, Galicia, and other areas seeking their freedom from the Dual Monarchy, rather than converting it into a “Great Danubian Republic” or some such, at the end of the war. It’s worth noting that Croatia several times in history chose to remain loyal to the Hungarian throne rather than go completely independent.

The idea of a multi-ethnic state fairly representing the constituent nations is not a bad one, and using a restored Habsburg monarch as head of state would probably leave a bad taste in the mouths of many, but could provide a rallying point – nearly all the Danube nations have a history that includes Habsburg rule.

What **Dragonstar** says about the history of Slovenia and Croatia is on target, and has a lot to do with the instability of Yugoslavia from 1918 on.

I don’t see “an organizational nightmare” – just the rather strained questions of what powers get centralized and what are left in the hands of the constituent national states that would come together to form the new (federal) country, and how to guarantee the latter against “creeping centralization.” Apart from language questions, it resembles what the independent countries of Rhode Island, New York, Virginia, Georgia and the other nine were faced with in 1787, and they did seem to work out an intelligent solution.

The bottom-line question, however, is whether there is any interest in creation of such a federation, with or without a figurehead Habsburg lending it some historical cachet.

Anybody know what the views of the population in the possible constituents towards the EU might be? That would provide some clue as to whether it would be workable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/15 "2003-06-21T19:54:48Z")

</div>

Nope, at least according to [worldroots.com](http://worldroots.com/brigitte/royal/habs-o.htm), he’s still alive and kicking, **Polycarp**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/16 "2003-06-21T20:15:16Z")

</div>

**Polycarp** : What you’ve described there isn’t a recreation of the Austro-Hungarian Empire is it? The organisational nightmare I’ve described would result from an attempt to return to the original borders.

You know that Serbia wasn’t part of Austria-Hungary, for example, even though Franz Josef seemed to have his eye on it with well-documented consequences. Restoration of the Serbian monarchy might have parallels with Spain since that restoration replaced a military dictatorship, but any suggestion of an umbrella organisation to bring the former Yugoslavian countries back together with or without any others along the course of the Danube would surely do more than leave a bad taste in the mouth? Give it a generation or two perhaps – they do say time is a great healer.

Candidates for entry into the EU currently include Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Poland. They have already held referenda to join and all votes were passed, only Hungarian voters being less than enthusiastic about the idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/17 "2003-06-21T20:25:41Z")

</div>

Excuse me – you didn’t mention Serbia (I mentally conflated your post with some others).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2003, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/18 "2003-06-21T20:34:25Z")

</div>

Actually, while Serbia was not a part of the Austrian Empire, there were a great number of Serbs living under Habsburg rule.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2003, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/19 "2003-06-22T00:06:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by everton \*  
> **Polycarp** : What you’ve described there isn’t a recreation of the Austro-Hungarian Empire is it? The organisational nightmare I’ve described would result from an attempt to return to the original borders.

Yep. But what “original borders”? The ones from 1914? Or the ones from 1654? Or any other date from the time that the Archdukes of Austria became King of Hungary as well.

> [@](#):
>
> You know that Serbia wasn’t part of Austria-Hungary, for example, even though Franz Josef seemed to have his eye on it with well-documented consequences. Restoration of the Serbian monarchy might have parallels with Spain since that restoration replaced a military dictatorship, but any suggestion of an umbrella organisation to bring the former Yugoslavian countries back together with or without any others along the course of the Danube would surely do more than leave a bad taste in the mouth? Give it a generation or two perhaps – they do say time is a great healer.

I suspect that given the attitude of the various South Slav ethnic groups towards each other, Yugoslavia would have no chance of recreation as a stable country in the reasonable future. As you say – a few generations may change people’s minds. Certainly my grandparents would have not thought that France and Germany would be talking establishing the EU!

> [@](#):
>
> Candidates for entry into the EU currently include Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Poland. They have already held referenda to join and all votes were passed, only Hungarian voters being less than enthusiastic about the idea.

That’s quite helpful; thanks!

FWIW, the following countries or parts of countries comprised pre-WWI Austria-Hungary:  
[ol][li]Austria[/li][li]Hungary[/li][li]Czech Republic[/li][li]Slovakia[/li][li]Slovenia[/li][li]Bosnia and Herzegovina[/li][li]Croatia[/li][li]The part of Serbia north of the Sava River (AKA the Banat)[/li][li]Trentino/Alto Adige and Venezia Giulia provinces in Italy[/li][li]the part of Romania west of the Carpathians and north of the Transylvanian Alps (AKA Transylvania)[/li][li]the southeast quadrant of Poland (AKA western Galicia)[/li][li]westernmost Ukraine, roughly south of the Bug and west of the 26th meridian east (AKA eastern Galicia and Ruthenia)[/ol][/li]  
A union of any two or more of the first seven of these into a federal state would not be unreasonable; obviously trying to peel off pieces of Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Italy, or Serbia to get back to the 1914 borders would be bizarre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![everton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ecb155/32.png) [@everton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/everton)\
**Post date:** [June 22, 2003, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406/20 "2003-06-22T00:55:12Z")

</div>

It was mainly the pre-1914 borders I had in mind, but the OP’s mention of Spain would take us all the way back to the C16[sup]th[/sup]. It seems **ralph124c** was just having some fun with the idea of a Ruritanian theme park, which is an entertaining enough game I suppose.

You’re right that a union of those states that currently have well-defined borders wouldn’t be too difficult to implement, but I can’t think what problems they currently have that would be solved by such a union. It seems to contradict recent independence actions by the Czechs and Slovenes pretty directly. The separation of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia from the rest of Yugoslavia was obviously inspired by problems that were more implacable at the time, but which are no longer immediate.

Understandably, they all seem to want to join the EU to take advantage of the larger, wealthier market it represents. But ancient frontier models have recently inspired alternative ambitions for some existing EU states (Italy’s Northern League for instance). Perhaps if things don’t work for the new members within the EU, and I hope they do, they might have other ideas some way down the line?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/could-we-revive-the-austro-hungarian-empire/183406.md?page=2)
