# COVID-19 Propaganda

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 27, 2020, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304 "2020-06-27T00:28:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/1 "2020-06-27T00:28:35Z")

</div>

This graphic comes from the Facebook page for [Medicare for All.](https://www.facebook.com/GetMedicareForAll/photos/a.225831164819188/745778492824450/?type=3&theater)

No time frame is given for the new infections, so we do not know if these are new infections for a day, a week, or a month, and we are given no information as to the previous numbers. This data would give us a much clearer picture. The figures are not broken down into cases showing no symptoms, mild symptoms, severe symptoms, and mortalities. Bear in mind that new infections are counterbalanced by previously infected persons whose immune systems have coped with the virus and moved such persons out of the infected population. So far as I am aware, there are no figures for persons who have been infected, but no longer are.

I am by no means an expert on epidemiology or any other medical science, but these are the rates of infection I got after entering the relevant information about national populations and the number of new infections in a LibreOffice spreadsheet. The population figures come from [Worldometer.](https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/)

**Italy** population: 60,462,625

New infections: 190

New infection rate: .00314

**France** population: 65,273,611

New Infections: 81

Infection rate: .00124

**Spain** population: 46,754,778

New infections: 390

Infection rate: .00834

**United States** 331,002, 651

New infections: 33,399

Infection rate: .00010

As can be seen, the number of new infections in the United States is by far the highest, but by dint of the far larger population of the United States, the rate of new infections (whatever the time frame) is far lower than Italy, Spain and France. Again, there simply is not enough information in this graphic to give us any meaningful picture of what is going on with COVID-19. Raw numbers are given to us without context and therefore with no way to evaluate the numbers in a truly meaningful way. As with Bush Junior’s WMDs which supposedly justified his disastrous invasion of Iraq, we are being stampeded. Someone is lying to us, and their motive can only be political.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/2 "2020-06-27T00:34:14Z")

</div>

Missed the edit window. The graphic is [here.](https://www.facebook.com/GetMedicareForAll/photos/a.225831164819188/745787729490193/?type=3&theater)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snfaulkner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snfaulkner/32/433_2.png) [@snfaulkner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snfaulkner)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/3 "2020-06-27T00:36:32Z")

</div>

Are you getting the “new infections” number from the Facebook thing? I don’t have Facebook so I can’t/won’t log in to see it.

But if you are, you just said those numbers were unreliable and contextless, so why are you using them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snfaulkner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snfaulkner/32/433_2.png) [@snfaulkner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snfaulkner)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/4 "2020-06-27T00:37:42Z")

</div>

Ok, I can see it now. Thanks. My question remains the same though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/5 "2020-06-27T00:44:44Z")

</div>

I have no idea about the raw data, but the arithmetic in the OP is obviously wrong. The infection rates you have calculated for all countries other than the U.S. are missing three zeroes, they are all 1000 times smaller. Based on those figures, the infection rate in the U.S. is at least an order of magnitude larger than any other country.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/6 "2020-06-27T00:48:55Z")

</div>

If you doubt the new infection numbers, look at the hospitalization numbers and the death numbers. That last one really won’t lie. But also realize that the hospitalization numbers will lag the infected numbers and the death numbers will lag the hospitalization numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/7 "2020-06-27T00:59:02Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> I have no idea about the raw data, but the arithmetic in the OP is obviously wrong. The infection rates you have calculated for all countries other than the U.S. are missing three zeroes, they are all 1000 times smaller. Based on those figures, the infection rate in the U.S. is at least an order of magnitude larger than any other country.

To be more precise, based on those data:

The infection rate per person ( **after accounting for population size** ) in the U.S. is 32 times higher than Italy, 81 times higher than France, 12 times higher than Spain.

> [@Chumba\_Wumba](#):
>
> Someone is lying to us

Since this is GD I won’t throw the accusation back at the OP, but I will accuse the OP of being rather bad at arithmetic. It’s obvious glancing at the numbers for Spain vs the U.S., for example, that the U.S. population is one order of magnitude larger whereas the number of new infections is **two** orders of magnitude larger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 2:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/8 "2020-06-27T02:10:24Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> If you doubt the new infection numbers, look at the hospitalization numbers and the death numbers. That last one really won’t lie. But also realize that the hospitalization numbers will lag the infected numbers and the death numbers will lag the hospitalization numbers.

The percentage of tests coming up positive is also a good indicator. This has been growing in the states that are spiking also.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/9 "2020-06-27T02:50:59Z")

</div>

Well, I didn’t say they were necessarily unreliable, but unless we know what populations over which these numbers are supposed to be an increase, then we don’t really know what significance the numbers have. Take the number for the USA. Is this an increase over yesterday’s numbers? Last week’s numbers? Last month’s numbers? Is it an increase over the known infected population or over the nation’s total population? If it’s an increase over yesterday’s number of infected, it could be seriously disturbing. If it’s an increase over the numbers for last week’s or last month’s infected, that still wouldn’t be good, but obviously that situation wouldn’t be as dire. Unless we know the baseline, the numbers we’re given don’t really tell us much–but, without providing a sound factual basis, they still make it look like the United States is in a horrible situation.

Look at this way. Suppose someone told you that he increased his income by 35% last year. That sounds pretty impressive, until he tells you he’d only earned two grand the year before that. Context is everything

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amarinth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@amarinth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/amarinth)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/10 "2020-06-27T02:56:55Z")

</div>

I, too, think you may have made an error with LibreOffice. (and I also took a look at the facebook page. It just has new infection numbers.)  
But you are correct that population size matters. So let’s look at the numbers in terms of Italys (Italies?)

| Country | Italy | France | Spain | US |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Population | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 5.5 |
| New Infections | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 175.8 |
| New Infection Rate | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 32.1 |

So while the US is 5.5 Italies in population, we have 175.8 Italies in New infections. That’s a lot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snfaulkner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snfaulkner/32/433_2.png) [@snfaulkner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snfaulkner)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 3:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/11 "2020-06-27T03:03:59Z")

</div>

Oh, I understand context just fine. What I don’t understand is why you think using, what you admit to being contexless numbers, in your calculations gives your results any merit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/12 "2020-06-27T03:10:03Z")

</div>

😬 Well, I don’t know what happened. When I plugged those numbers into the Google Workspace spreadsheet, those missing zeros popped right up. I can only surmise that I somehow didn’t have the LibreOffice spreadsheet on the right settings or I was careless about entering the figures, but it doesn’t matter. It was still an inexcusable and embarrassing mistake.

Even so, my basic point still stands. Yes, the number for the United States looks awful compared to the others, be even so the increase in infections is only slightly above 1 in 10,000. By juxtaposing the large number with the smaller numbers, the graphic makes it seem that our situation is far worse than it actually is. I am immensely skeptical this could possibly justify extending the lock down, nor can it justify the massive damage it has done to our economy and to millions of human lives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 3:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/13 "2020-06-27T03:12:47Z")

</div>

Not when you consider that Italy was already much more infected before the United States, and before it was widely known that there was a serious problem. Thank you, _China!_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/14 "2020-06-27T03:43:59Z")

</div>

> [@Chumba\_Wumba](#):
>
> Even so, my basic point still stands.

Are you for real? The gross error in the arithmetic of your OP produced numbers that were vastly _more_ misleading in the opposite direction. And you’re doubling down on your “point”, even when it has been shown to you that the U.S. figures are between 10 and 80 times worse than the other countries cited even _after_ adjusting for population size.

If I had posted this OP I’d be so embarrassed that I’d stop posting and just hope it dropped off the page quickly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chumba\_Wumba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e9a140/32.png) [@Chumba\_Wumba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chumba_Wumba)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 5:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/15 "2020-06-27T05:53:45Z")

</div>

No, sir. That graphic is a superb example of the tripe we’re being fed in support of the lock down. I suggest you improve your manners.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BippityBoppityBoo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bippityboppityboo/32/5745_2.png) [@BippityBoppityBoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BippityBoppityBoo)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/16 "2020-06-27T06:06:34Z")

</div>

I like Riemann’s manners just fine.

I suggest you improve your news sources. Mine always include the context- “compared to yesterday, over a week ago, etc”. Choose unbiased ones. I use NPR, the NYT, the CDC. I am sure other posters could suggest equally accurate, trustworthy and learned information sources. Please don’t choke at the purported ‘liberalism’ of my news sources. They won’t lie about the numbers-they could get called out and lose their reputations. Make your own conclusions from the numbers. I would suggest sitting down with someone who has taken a statistics course as you make those conclusions. You will look and sound the better for it.

I wish you well. Really I do. I also wish the rest of us well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/17 "2020-06-27T06:21:59Z")

</div>

> [@Chumba\_Wumba](#):
>
> I suggest you improve your manners.

I have nothing more to add, that would just be divisive in these difficult times.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 8:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/18 "2020-06-27T08:55:52Z")

</div>

I just cannot understand you Chumba Wumba - first you bemoan figures from some Facebook page, a source that is not reliable and known for spreading false information, you then back up your assertion by citing a reliable source i.e Worldometer which supports your view of the Facebook page, BUT, you then go on to trash all data from all sources, you use poor maths when the figures are already cited on Worldometers and then you conclude the whole thing is some sort of plot. The information is available and yet you selectively quote or ignore it. Are you one of those people who try to obscure facts by citing bad sources and then trashing all sources? If you are unaware that this is what you are doing, look more carefully at your message and then look at the reliable sources, otherwise you risk damaging your own credibility

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/19 "2020-06-27T14:12:27Z")

</div>

> [@Chumba\_Wumba](#):
>
> No, sir. That graphic is a superb example of the tripe we’re being fed in support of the lock down. I suggest you improve your manners.

Yes, but the point is that you were wrong. Your calculations were incorrect. The US has a much higher infection rate, and that isn’t explained by its population.

The numbers actually ARE much higher, so your complaint that the info was misleading is incorrect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/elmer_j.fudd/32/1211_2.png) [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elmer_J.Fudd)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2020, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304/20 "2020-06-27T14:23:16Z")

</div>

If I was the author of that OP, I would BEG the moderators to close this thread. You might as well start a Great Debate thread proposing that 2+2=5.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-19-propaganda/913304.md?page=2)
