# Covid booster shots, news and opinion

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565>\
**Category:** The Quarantine Zone\
**Tags:** covid-quarantine\
**Created:** [September 12, 2021, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565 "2021-09-12T19:34:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 4:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/41 "2021-09-14T04:32:15Z")

</div>

Yes, that’s why that’s a short term answer. Bloomberg reports that there have already been about 5.7B doses of vaccine given out. All the companies that made those are still doing it, and more are coming in line. In particular, Novavax says it will make 2B doses next year. That’s a cheap vaccine that stable in an ordinary fridge and is about as effective as the mRNA vaccines. So another 8B+ doses next year, many of which are suitable for less developed parts of the world.

So by this time next year, there should be plenty of vaccine to go around, although no don’t we’ll still have places that don’t get it, either because the little don’t want it or for logistical reasons. (I bet somewhere will be at eat in a way that keeps vaccines out, for instance.)

So I’m curious what the recommendations will be then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/42 "2021-09-14T11:41:54Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> I generally don’t support lying and breaking the law to get a third booster,

Is lying to the CDC illegal?

I got my booster a few days ago. Medication I’m taking qualified me, but just barely. Honestly, I would have checked “yes” to the immunocompromised question regardless.

There were many yes/no questions and I just rapidly checked the correct boxes. I didn’t see any warnings that an incorrect answer could mean jail time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jay\_Z](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Jay\_Z](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jay_Z)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 12:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/43 "2021-09-14T12:49:28Z")

</div>

I will say that I’m of the opinion that people getting unauthorized boosters strengthens the arguments of the unvaxxed. If the individual knows what’s best in that circumstance, why not every circumstance?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 12:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/44 "2021-09-14T12:54:13Z")

</div>

> [@Jay\_Z](#):
>
> I will say that I’m of the opinion that people getting unauthorized boosters strengthens the arguments of the unvaxxed.

No it doesn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jay\_Z](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Jay\_Z](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jay_Z)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/45 "2021-09-14T12:57:39Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> No it doesn’t.

It strengthens the argument that personal choice, people’s control over their own health is important. It absolutely does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/46 "2021-09-14T15:10:23Z")

</div>

Well, I believe that a person SHOULD have a lot of control over their own health.

I saw a great line about mandatory vaccination, though. It was from some old judicial ruling. It compared walking around when potentially infectious to walking around randomly punching at anything near you. It also included the line about your freedom to swing your arms ends where the other person’s nose begins, or something like that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/47 "2021-09-14T15:59:48Z")

</div>

> [@Jay\_Z](#):
>
> It strengthens the argument that personal choice, people’s control over their own health is important.

There is nothing untrue in this statement. People should have control over their own health and I’ll butt out of it. Until it affects mine. In other words, now. So no, it doesn’t strengthen the arguments of the unvaxxed.

There is not a single valid study, finding, presidential proclamation or anything else of that nature which has so much as given an iota of credence to the arguments of the unvaxxed. It doesn’t really matter, as they’ll make up whatever they want to justify their behavior, but nothing those of us on the side of science have done has strengthened their arguments. More fodder that they twist is not the same as strengthening.

So again, “No it doesn’t.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jay\_Z](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Jay\_Z](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jay_Z)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/48 "2021-09-14T16:11:16Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> There is not a single valid study, finding, presidential proclamation or anything else of that nature which has so much as given an iota of credence to the arguments of the unvaxxed. It doesn’t really matter, as they’ll make up whatever they want to justify their behavior, but nothing those of us on the side of science have done has strengthened their arguments. More fodder that they twist is not the same as strengthening.
> 
> So again, “No it doesn’t.”

There are also no studies that say that people should be going rogue and getting “boosters” when they have not been authorized to do so. Yet people are doing that. The best argument I have seen is “well it doesn’t hurt.” Except that apparently it could hurt, because apparently too soon a booster does nothing, you’d be better off waiting until **you are told to do so**.

Covid is catholic on how it treats people. I agree that people should not be making their own decisions, because it doesn’t work with infectious disease. Covid doesn’t care what you think. I want to train people in this line of thinking. The argument is that “I need to listen to the experts, we all need to do the same because that’s how infectious disease works.” I do not think that people going out and lying to medical personnel because they themselves think it’s time for a booster plays into that argument. It plays into the argument that “I should decide how to best treat my body.” That **does** play into the antivaxx line of thinking, because it’s an argument for personal freedom. Given that the unauthorized boosters are providing little to any benefit, I don’t approve of them, and people should stop lying to get them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tofor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tofor/32/13727_2.png) [@tofor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tofor)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/49 "2021-09-14T16:42:01Z")

</div>

> [@Jay\_Z](#):
>
> It plays into the argument that “I should decide how to best treat my body.” That **does** play into the antivaxx line of thinking, because it’s an argument for personal freedom.

I think what you are trying to say is that someone getting an unapproved booster uses the same line of reasoning as someone not getting vaccinated at all.

This is not the same thing as “plays into the argument”. I think DMC is disagreeing with something you didn’t intend to say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jay\_Z](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Jay\_Z](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jay_Z)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/50 "2021-09-14T17:15:26Z")

</div>

> [@tofor](#):
>
> I think what you are trying to say is that someone getting an unapproved booster uses the same line of reasoning as someone not getting vaccinated at all.
> 
> This is not the same thing as “plays into the argument”. I think DMC is disagreeing with something you didn’t intend to say.

You’re correct, that’s what I am trying to say. It is the same line of reasoning.

As a society, we will benefit far, far more from getting an unvaxxed person vaxxed than from a booster line jumper lying to get another shot. By a hundred fold at least I would reckon. I want to keep arguments simple as possible. I want to minimize the personal freedom line of argument. So if an unvaxxed goes “what about the people getting unauthorized boosters” I’m not going to be on the lying line jumpers’ side. I want to emphasize the importance that **everyone** does this. I want to minimize the personal freedom line of reasoning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JaneDoe42](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/janedoe42/32/14104_2.png) [@JaneDoe42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JaneDoe42)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2021, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/51 "2021-09-14T20:26:06Z")

</div>

This really is the same as driving a car. The most important thing to do is be predictable. Being predictable is following laws and guidelines just like _everyone_ else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/i_love_me_vol.i/32/521_2.png) [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/I_Love_Me_Vol.I)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2021, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/52 "2021-09-15T03:35:44Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> I’m not personally comfortable lying to get a medication, but i find it hard to hold it against someone else, especially someone old who got their initial vaccine more than 6 months ago.

_[NOTE: I never meant for this to get so long. TL;DR, I guess would be: 1. sometimes lying might be an ethical thing to do, and, 2. I’m immuno-compromised and I almost lied to get third jab and I’m fine with that.]_

As for lying to get a third dose (not **puzzlegal** but folks in general) I can see where people could feel it’s an “ethical lie” to tell. For instance, someone could feel that everything’s gone to hell with so many anti-vaxxers so they must do whatever they can to increase their survivability. This is a bit like the ethics of stealing food when you’re family’s starving and you have no other recourse.

Another example was me (almost). I am very immuno-compromised (I say ‘very’ because I am on rituximab. If you read enough studies re: outcomes for folks on various immune compromising drugs you’ll find that rituximab is the poster-child for “Very Worst Drug for Ravaging Your Immune System” so after MUCH reading of journal articles, etc., I was prepared to get a third shot a month or so ago (I had Moderna doses in April and May) when the general medical opinion was that those shots really wouldn’t work very well since I was only 3 months out from my last rituximab infusion. Better to get vaxxed 8 months to a year after the last infusion.

I knew that at the time I was jabbed but the supply was so tenuous everyone said “Go ahead. Just get the shot now while you can.” I thought, and told my doctors, that I would but I was for sure going to get _re-vaxxed_ later after 8 or 10 months had passed.

FF to a month ago when the time was right, I asked my doctor about getting a third shot and he was very dismissive of it and even called the doctors who were recommending that “quacks”. Pissed me right off and I was going to go lie and get the shot anyway when a week or so later the (FDA? CDC? BMI?? ASCAP??) okayed third shots for immune compromised (BTW, it’s not a “booster” in my case, IMO, rather it’s a “do-over” or perhaps just the appropriate dosing regimen to begin with for people in my situation). So I wouldn’t need to lie. But it would have been ethically OK if I had needed to lie, IMO.

I still haven’t gotten the third shot because it’s a dilemna. I want the shot NOW because I am so unprotected, but, I know that as more time passes (from my last RTX infusion in January) my immune B-Cells will are getting more plentiful so the vax will be more effective.

Truth is, if it turns out I once again got the shot when my B-Cells were not at an effective level then I would plan to get yet another shot (4th) when they have better re-populated. Probably have to lie for that, hope it’s not necessary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2021, 11:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/53 "2021-09-15T11:22:31Z")

</div>

> [@puzzlegal](#):
>
> I’m not personally comfortable lying to get a medication,

I’d generally agree (says the guy with a Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana card with a PTSD diagnosis).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2021, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/54 "2021-09-15T14:02:15Z")

</div>

> [@I\_Love\_Me\_Vol.I](#):
>
> I asked my doctor about getting a third shot and he was very dismissive of it and even called the doctors who were recommending that “quacks”. Pissed me right off and I was going to go lie and get the shot anyway when a week or so later the (FDA? CDC? BMI?? ASCAP??) okayed third shots for immune compromised

This seems like the sort of thing where I would say you should seek out a second opinion, if feasible.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2021, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/55 "2021-09-15T16:11:57Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> This seems like the sort of thing where I would say you should seek out a second opinion, if feasible.

Oh god no, you’ll strengthen the arguments of the anti-vax crusaders. Or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2021, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/56 "2021-09-15T16:40:55Z")

</div>

> [@tofor](#):
>
> I think what you are trying to say is that someone getting an unapproved booster uses the same line of reasoning as someone not getting vaccinated at all.

While closer to reality, still not true. One uses actual reasoning (at least most do, I’m sure there are idiots who stumbled onto the correct choice), the other looks for excuses. I don’t think they’re equivalent in any way.

> [@tofor](#):
>
> this is not the same thing as “plays into the argument”.

Correct. The people doing the right thing, even those who might be making their own decisions, aren’t playing into the arguments of selfish assholes who are going to do what they are doing no matter what anyone else does, says, or proves. Hell, some of them continue to toe the line as they or their own loved ones lay dying in the hospital. There is no value in being concerned about “playing into their arguments” as their arguments are worthless drivel and completely mutable as needed. The rest of us can continue to make rational, thoughtful choices, while they continue to do their damnedest to kill themselves and everyone around them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2021, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/57 "2021-09-16T01:36:36Z")

</div>

> **[Two senior FDA vaccine leaders step down as agency faces decision on boosters...](https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/31/health/fda-vaccine-officials-step-down/index.html)**
>
> Two senior leaders in the FDA's vaccine review office are stepping down, even as the agency works toward high-profile decisions around Covid-19 vaccine approvals, authorizations for younger children and booster shots.

They are stepping down because they said the data is not in yet on boosters, and the Biden administration overrode them.

Follow the science, people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2021, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/58 "2021-09-16T02:14:49Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> They are stepping down because they said the data is not in yet on boosters, and the Biden administration overrode them.

Can you point to the place in the article where this is mentioned so that we can discuss what it actually states?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2021, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/59 "2021-09-16T03:00:07Z")

</div>

> [@DMC](#):
>
> Can you point to the place in the article where this is mentioned so that we can discuss what it actually states?

It looks like CNN left that detail out. I originally read it in _Politico_, but CNN was the first thing that cme up when I re-Googled it and I used it thinking it would have the same info. Sorry.

Try this:

[https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/31/biden-booster-plan-fda-508149](https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/31/biden-booster-plan-fda-508149)

> [@](#):
>
> On Tuesday, two top FDA vaccine regulators resigned — a decision that one former official said was rooted in anger over the agency’s lack of autonomy in the booster planning so far. A current health official said the pair, Marion Gruber and Philip Krause, left over differences with FDA’s top vaccine official Peter Marks. Now the agency is facing a potential mutiny among its staff and outside vaccine advisers, several of whom feel cut out of key decisions and who view the plan to offer boosters to all adults as [premature and unnecessary.](https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/30/cdc-covid-booster-shots-507803)
> 
> POLITICO spoke to 11 current and former health officials and people familiar with the matter who described growing exasperation with the administration’s disjointed process for implementing its booster plan. Those sources said there is little coordination between federal health agencies, even as two top FDA officials try to guide the rollout.

The whole article is very interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2021, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565/60 "2021-09-16T03:11:48Z")

</div>

So a former official is telling us why newly retiring officials are leaving? Was this former official a Trump appointee, perhaps? Did he explain how he had insider knowledge while not being an insider?

A current official states that they left over key differences with Peter Marks. Is there a reason to believe that Peter Marks doesn’t follow the science? Feel free to explain to me how he is a representative of the Biden administration.

Is it possible they left over rushed boosters? Sure. Have they made any statements along those lines? Not that I’ve seen. Do I trust a former official more than a current one and should I give credence to either over the word of the people leaving? Has anyone asked them why they are leaving? What was their answer?

Or you can skip all of that silliness and tell us why we shouldn’t use boosters, based on this science that you follow. That might be a perfectly reasonable argument without all of this speculation and supposition from unnamed sources, some of whom aren’t even affiliated with the organization.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/covid-booster-shots-news-and-opinion/950565.md?page=4)
