Covington Catholic High (in case it hasn't been mentioned already)

How many pages will you attack a thread because people are saying things in it that you don’t think they should be allowed to say?

Do we need to get your approval before we start threads from now on?

Exactly how much free speech are you looking to outlaw, in your quest to have speech without consequence?

I strongly suspect that you have an autistic child that you hate because you think your wife got pregnant by her white boss. But you can’t be sure because your grandmother was white, so maybe that’s where your child’s lighter skin comes from? So now, rather than admit how much you hate your possibly illegitimate child, you just hate white people and blame autism on them.

Ths theory may be wrong but it seems to cover all the facts.

I already did not agree with the OP concentrating on an specific kid, I did agree though with what even the Catholics in power in Kentucky are telling us.

https://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article224984305.html

So, again, I do think that the ones that allowed or recommended the students to wear the paraphernalia of the MAGAT in chief still need to be dealt with. And for the kids to learn the proper lessons, IMHO it does not require expulsion or punishment. Unless it is shown that it was the students who decided that embracing the bigoted message and insulting behavior of a fake pro-lifer was a good idea.

Death threats and doxxing a teenager aren’t my ideas of free speech. It’s telling that that is what the left considers as acceptable “consequences.”

Again, nut-picking is not a convincing argument, I already have seen attempts at character assassinations coming from the right regarding Mr. Phillips and past history has shown that mostly some guys from the right do then fall to do likewise to people like Mr. Phillips (and lately most of the onesgoing beyond threatsare coming from the right). Point being that indeed doing that to a teenager or to a Native American is not proper.

Now, having said that, that does not exculpate the trolling behavior and the lessons that should be learned.

Dude, I highly, highly doubt Huey is some kind of government agent sent to try and cause racial tensioin. He’s just some jagoff troll – the internet’s full of them.

Remember, when you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras.

Poor Huey. Like a little chihuahua’s incessant yapping for attention - it can be novel at first but after a while it gets boring. You keep holding onto your victimhood as if it is the only thing of value you have to offer, otherwise you may be completely worthless.

Dude.

I am only intermittenly on the same wavelength as Guinastasia. I’ve been fucking pitted by Guinastasia and served up a helping of snark from time to time in other unmentionable environments. She’s annoying, caustic, and ascerbic. But if you were of the morphological sexual preference that appeals to me and she were completely not, I’d 100 times rather spend time with her than have to endure you. She has the kind of dignity and cleverness and aplomb you can only in your wildest dreams pretend to, she bothers to think and consider on a level you don’t seem to so much as aspire to, and she’s human and at least cordially kind even to people she’s in fervent disagreement with. I oughta know.

You’re seriously fucked up and no one prefers you.

Why is anyone talking to this clown? He as much of a write-off as doorhinge is and Clothahump was.

Until you have enough of a backbone to speak up when “your side” does that exact same thing (and also somewhat frequently murders people), perhaps you should go fuck yourself?

Is this an example of a bothsidesdoit fallacy?

Once again, to put this thread back on track, I’d still like to know where the fuck the adults were, and why they didn’t step in before it got out of hand.

Well thank you. FWIW, while we’ve had plenty of disagreements, you’re a pretty cool guy.

I’m not sure. Is that the phrase that describes how you lack the moral character to speak up when someone you share political beliefs with does something bad? Like, remember when you wouldn’t speak out against a pedophile because he was a registered Republican?

No offense, but if you lack the moral character to speak out against pedophilia just because it’s a Republican molesting the little girls, then you should probably go fuck yourself.

Roy Moore seems like a truly terrible person (I thought so long before I heard any of the sexual allegations), but I am unaware of any accusations involving prepubescent children, therefore “pedophile” is a misnomer.

Well, that certainly excuses Octopus’s behavior.

Wasn’t saying it did. I just wrinkle my nose every time I see that term loosely bandied about to describe sexual acts with teenagers. It may have been rape, sexual assault, or statutory rape, but that’s not pedophilia.

Wow, you people are fucking nuts. Just wholeheartedly, completely fucking insane. :rolleyes:

I know you are technically correct and people wrongly call anyone who has sex with a minor a “pedophile” all the time but it always make people suspicious when people are insistent on correcting the error. That’s why I’ve stopped doing it myself.

I recently tried to start a conversation with a mod about this type of thing and was rebuffed. The message seemed clear to me: we don’t care what you think or want.

Are there really very many Trump supporters here? That’s not my impression, but I don’t read most threads.

Suspicious of what, exactly?