# Cracked on UK and US forces at Normandy

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [May 13, 2013, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250 "2013-05-13T18:25:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D18](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@D18](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D18)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/1 "2013-05-13T18:25:17Z")

</div>

Today’s Cracked Photoplasty is "Shocking facts that will change how you picture history. [This here slide](http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_583_33-shocking-facts-that-will-change-how-you-picture-history_p33/#14) makes the point “1944, Normandy. The British second army: 83,115 Men. The US First Army: Approx. 73,000 Men”.

What am I supposed to be shocked at?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aceplace57](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aceplace57/32/3500_2.png) [@aceplace57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aceplace57)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/2 "2013-05-13T18:31:13Z")

</div>

I had always thought the invasion force was huge. 250,000 at least. There were multiple beachheads Utah, Sword, Omaha, Gold and Juno.

Cracked left out the Canadians. They had a large force too mostly on Juno

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D18](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@D18](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D18)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/3 "2013-05-13T18:34:24Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> Cracked left out the Canadians. They had a large force too.

Yes, 25K or so of us Canucks. I guess I’m not shocked because those are about the numbers I was expecting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Santos\_L\_Halper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/santos_l_halper/32/1_2.png) [@Santos\_L\_Halper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Santos_L_Halper)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/4 "2013-05-13T18:40:50Z")

</div>

That they can account for the exact number of Brits but can only estimate the American to the nearest thousand? 🙂

That’s all I can come up with…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikeF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@MikeF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MikeF)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/5 "2013-05-13T18:44:01Z")

</div>

I dunno. Maybe most of us Yanks think D-Day was, primarily, an American invasion? We did take the brunt of the causalities and most film I’ve seen shows Americans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/6 "2013-05-13T18:44:06Z")

</div>

Because a lot of Americans think that we won World War II all by ourselves with John Wayne up there on the front line.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![appleciders](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85f322/32.png) [@appleciders](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/appleciders)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/7 "2013-05-13T18:48:00Z")

</div>

That list is really terrible. One bit has a note that the Roman empire wasn’t that large compared to other, larger empires, and includes Ireland, which was never, ever under Roman control, either de facto or de jure. Other dubious claims start with phrases like “It has been calculated” and “It has been claimed.” That’s lousy even for Cracked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D18](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@D18](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D18)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/8 "2013-05-13T18:48:33Z")

</div>

> [@Zsofia](#):
>
> Because a lot of Americans think that we won World War II all by ourselves with John Wayne up there on the front line.

Ah! Just in the spirit of overcoming ignorance, then, I’ll point out that that John Wayne [actually fought in the Pacific](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sands_of_Iwo_Jima), and

. . . he died!

😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/9 "2013-05-13T18:49:21Z")

</div>

I think you are supposed to be shocked that the British landed more total troops than the Americans did on D-Day. The typical narrative is that it was overwhelming American numbers and firepower that carried the day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aceplace57](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aceplace57/32/3500_2.png) [@aceplace57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aceplace57)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/10 "2013-05-13T18:54:47Z")

</div>

Good summary of the beaches and forces involved.

> **[Map of the D-Day Beaches](https://www.tripline.net/trip/Map_of_the_D-Day_Beaches-6333326077031003BD49BAE5A339E6F8)**
>
> Operation Neptune – the landing phase of Overlord — called for a five-division front spread across 50 miles (80 km) of coastline; three airborne divisions (two American, one Anglo-Canadian) would also land in the pre-dawn hours of D-Day. By nightfall...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/11 "2013-05-13T18:59:49Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> I had always thought the invasion force was huge. 250,000 at least. There were multiple beachheads Utah, Sword, Omaha, Gold and Juno.
> 
> Cracked left out the Canadians. They had a large force too mostly on Juno

[According to Wiki](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings#Allied_order_of_battle), the Canadian (also relatively small numbers of French) soldiers were wrapped into the British total. When they were subtracted out, about 62,000 soldiers of the force were, um, … _British_ British.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Asympotically\_fat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e47c2d/32.png) [@Asympotically\_fat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Asympotically_fat)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/12 "2013-05-13T19:01:37Z")

</div>

The Canadian troops were part of the British 2nd army. There were about 10,000 more Americans troops than troops from the UK, but thestrength of the UK and Canadian contingent was greater than the American contingent by about 10,000 troops.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/13 "2013-05-13T19:05:35Z")

</div>

The Nazi numbers are a lot more surprising then the Allied ones. Only 10,000 vs 150,000 for the Allies.

Also I think movies give a somewhat skewed vision of D-Day by focusing on Omaha beach where casulties were really high. I remember looking up casualties for all the landings and being surprised by how low they were.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/14 "2013-05-13T19:28:28Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> The Nazi numbers are a lot more surprising then the Allied ones. Only 10,000 vs 150,000 for the Allies.

The Germans were enormously well dug in along the coastline, multiplying their force against the undefended invaders.

Fortunately, the Sardinia deception and the massive Russian efforts in the weeks before (just discussed in another thread) kept them from reinforcing the Normandy line before we dug in ourselves. Besides minimizing the Allied help with the invasion, this is one case where the Russian contribution has all but been forgotten in US histories.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JBDivmstr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b4bc9f/32.png) [@JBDivmstr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JBDivmstr)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/15 "2013-05-13T19:36:36Z")

</div>

I can tell you what _ **I’m** _ shocked at…

The fact that you’re relying on Cracked for factual information. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JBDivmstr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b4bc9f/32.png) [@JBDivmstr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JBDivmstr)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/16 "2013-05-13T19:37:42Z")

</div>

> [@D18](#):
>
> Today’s Cracked Photoplasty is "Shocking facts that will change how you picture history. [This here slide](http://www.cracked.com/photoplasty_583_33-shocking-facts-that-will-change-how-you-picture-history_p33/#14) makes the point “1944, Normandy. The British second army: 83,115 Men. The US First Army: Approx. 73,000 Men”.
> 
> What am I supposed to be shocked at?

I can tell you what _ **I’m** _ shocked at…

The fact that you’re relying on Cracked for factual information. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![engineer\_comp\_geek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/engineer_comp_geek/32/504_2.png) [@engineer\_comp\_geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/engineer_comp_geek)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/17 "2013-05-13T19:57:28Z")

</div>

> [@Zsofia](#):
>
> Because a lot of Americans think that we won World War II all by ourselves with John Wayne up there on the front line.

This.

Americans also tend to completely ignore that whole other front that was over there. They know the Soviets were involved and did some fighting and stuff but are pretty sure that in the grand scheme of things it didn’t amount to much. The reality is that the U.S. suffered about half a million deaths in WWII. The Soviets, by comparison, suffered somewhere between 9 and 15 million deaths (depending on whose statistics you go by). So while we think John Wayne and Hurrah! and we did everything important, the Soviets are more like it was our war and you stupid Americans just came in for a tiny bit at the end and didn’t really contribute much. While both the typical American view and the typical Soviet view are both a bit biased and skewed due to patriotism, I think it’s safe to say that the Soviet version is probably closer to the truth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D18](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@D18](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D18)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/18 "2013-05-13T20:04:25Z")

</div>

^Yes, I recall one of the dopers in another thread calling WWII a war between Germany and the USSR, with a side skirmish in Western Europe.

And **JBD**? I heard you the first time! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![casdave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c6cbf5/32.png) [@casdave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/casdave)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/19 "2013-05-13T20:11:41Z")

</div>

It is far better to state that this was a massively cooperative affair, the war may well not have been won without any one of the major allies.

US casualties through the whole of this war were less than UK (including colonies), but these are dwarfed in sheer numbers by those of the Chinese and Russians (partly also depends when you decide WWII actually started)

In terms of percentage of populations killed then its likely to be Poland or perhaps one of the Balkan states where the death toll was horrific.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250/20 "2013-05-13T20:32:42Z")

</div>

> [@Boyo\_Jim](#):
>
> [According to Wiki](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_landings#Allied_order_of_battle), the Canadian (also relatively small numbers of French) soldiers were wrapped into the British total. When they were subtracted out, about 62,000 soldiers of the force were, um, … _British_ British.

Gregory House, MD: Sorry, you put the queen on your money, you’re British.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cracked-on-uk-and-us-forces-at-normandy/658250.md?page=2)
