Wow.
So there appears to be a higher standard in the use of force, as applied to pre-conviction suspects, compared to convicted criminals.
Has there been any challenges to this? (If so, Im guessing that they were unsuccessful, right?)
Wow.
So there appears to be a higher standard in the use of force, as applied to pre-conviction suspects, compared to convicted criminals.
Has there been any challenges to this? (If so, Im guessing that they were unsuccessful, right?)
I have a habit of posting questions here and having received a more than adequate answer don’t like to bump my thread just to say thanks.
However, as i have another question let me take the opportunity to thank all who have contributed (to this and any previous thread of mine!), very interesting reading!
So, my related question(s).
Just to retain a little personal dignity, i know TV shows aren’t real, i just never fail to be surprised just how far off they are!
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=475&invol=312 (use of force on prisoners is governed by Eighth Amendment instead of Fourth); http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=490&invol=386&pageno=395 (same)
I already posted the answer to this question. The general law is that you can shoot a prisoner to stop him from committing a serious felony - and escaping from prison is considered a serious felony. So the crime he was originally committed for is not a relevant issue.
I don’t see where you’re getting this. A prison guard can shoot a person in any situation where a police officer could - and can also shoot someone who is escaping custody which a police officer sometimes cannot do.
The one place where the definitions of use of force differ greatly between police and the general public with pointing a weapon at someone. As you may suspect we are not obligated to wait for someone to pull out a weapon before we do. This isn’t the Old West (as seen in the movies). If a non-police officer points a gun at someone it will probably fall under an aggrevated assault statute depending on the jurisdiction. For police officers it is called “constructive authority”, on the same level as ordering someone to the ground. As stated in the use of force policy previously cited:
And from the deadly force portion:
As for yelling “freeze”, we are not trained to say that but that type of situation does come up from time to time. “Don’t move” is better with “Show me your hands” to follow when they are no longer moving. We try not to say both at the same time.
What I was commenting on was that, according to some of the cites I saw above, a police officer cannot shoot a fleeing suspect unless:
But a prison inmate seen trying to cut the fence in an escape attempt, and may be shot, even if noone was being threatened at that time.
I saw a different standard, is all. I didn’t mean to imply any judgement values to it. But lawyers love to argue over these little differences.