# Current Next Pope Predictions **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [February 5, 2005, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549 "2005-02-05T18:38:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\ **Post date:** [February 8, 2005, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/41 "2005-02-08T13:28:02Z")
I’d take good money (maundy and otherwise - even pieces of silver) that the next Pope will be: 1. Italian. They almost always are, and the Italian powerbase will be looking to re-establish itself. 2. Already working in the Vatican. They don’t feel the need for a “pastoral” pope like JPII. They feel that whats needed now is a “manager” (After all the Church is pretty much the world’s largest multi national). 3. Getting on a bit. They don’t want to follow JPII with another twenty year Pope.l As for the possibilty of an American - no way. The American RC church should pretty muuch excommunicate itself. It appears to think that matters of doctrinbe are up for negotiation. That is like trying to negotiate with the weather. Some kind of arrangement like the CofE is probably best for all concerned. ---
**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/42 "2005-02-09T01:12:14Z")
> [@owlstretchingtime](#): > > Some kind of arrangement like the CofE is probably best for all concerned. Meanwhile, some on the CofE (Anglican) side say things like “maybe we need a more central authority…” The grass is always greener, you know… ---
**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/43 "2005-02-09T01:20:46Z")
> [@owlstretchingtime](#): > > 1. Getting on a bit. They don’t want to follow JPII with another twenty year Pope. I think you’re right. But with medicine these days, I figure we’re likely to see longer Papacies, it’ll be a guessing game. > [@](#): > > Some kind of arrangement like the CofE is probably best for all concerned. I try not to be the kind of guy who says “never gonna happen,” but… ---
**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 5:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/44 "2005-02-09T05:53:58Z")
Of course, since the RCC is the “mother of all harlots” (see [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=300244](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=300244)), by rights the papacy should go to the highest bidder. Paging Bill Gates! 🙂 No, wait a minute . . . Bill is already God. Pope would be a step down. ---
**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/45 "2005-02-09T12:52:50Z")
> [@Rufus Xavier](#): > > Is there a Gloria Olivae on that list? If so, that’s the one I’m picking. Certainly too early for Pete II! 😃 ---
**Author:** ![Q.N.Jones](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/3da27b/32.png) [@Q.N.Jones](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Q.N.Jones)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/46 "2005-02-09T17:47:19Z")
> [@owlstretchingtime](#): > > 1. Getting on a bit. They don’t want to follow JPII with another twenty year Pope. Why not? As an outsider, I’m curious. ---
**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\ **Post date:** [February 9, 2005, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549/47 "2005-02-09T18:19:50Z")
> [@Q.N. Jones](#): > > Why not? As an outsider, I’m curious. Because that’s a long time, and somebody who’s Pope for that long has a lot of influence. As has been said before in this thread, the current pope has apponted almost all of the current cardinals. That means it’s less likely for views other than the Pope’s to be represented or get fair hearing in the curia and among the cardinals and bishops. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/current-next-pope-predictions/288549.md?page=2)