# Cute: now the DEA practices medicine

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 11, 2003, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795 "2003-07-11T19:54:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2003, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/1 "2003-07-11T19:54:31Z")

</div>

God, the drug war disgusts me. This is reaching even more silly proportions.

[ADVICE TO DOCTORS RE: PAIN MANAGEMENT](http://www.aapsonline.org/painman/advice.htm) from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

Some interesting notes:

[quote]  
If you’re thinking about getting into pain management using opioids as appropriate: DON’T. Forget what you learned in medical school – drug agents now set medical standards.

…

If you are already prescribing opioids:[ul][li]Do thorough physicals, even if unnecessary and not helpful…[_]Refer patients early and often to addictionologists, orthopedists, pain specialists, psychologists, regardless of expense or your opinion of helpfulness…[_]Consider phasing out this part of your practice, giving patients plenty of time to find another doctor…[/ul][/li][/quote]  
Cute, huh?

What started this?  
[http://www.drcnet.org/wol/295.shtml#aapshassman](http://www.drcnet.org/wol/295.shtml#aapshassman)

> [@](#):
>
> “We don’t really want to give doctors this advice,” said Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the AAPS, “but something has got to be done. A lot of doctors are afraid to prescribe opiates even for desperately ill patients – it’s not worth spending the rest of your life in prison for prescribing pain medications,” she told DRCNet.
> 
> That’s the prospect confronting Tucson pain management specialist Dr. Jeri Hassman ([http://www.drhassman.com](http://www.drhassman.com)), who faces a 66-count indictment charging her with prescribing opioid painkillers to six patients without a legitimate medical reason.

Perhaps legitimate, you might wonder.

> [@](#):
>
> “Why in the sam hell didn’t they go to her if they thought some of her patients were doctor-shopping?” fumed Butler. “They didn’t inform her of a potential problem, they just sent in an undercover agent claiming he was in pain.”

An even better question. Further:

> [@](#):
>
> There is a common practice across the country that seems designed more to cripple doctors than to achieve justice, Butler said. “What happens is the DEA suspends the doctor’s license to prescribe, then the doctor appeals and the case is set for an administrative hearing. Now the doctor has to reveal to the DEA the specific defense to the charges, which effectively wipes out your Fifth Amendment privilege,” he explained. “After the DEA gets a look at your defense, but before the actual administrative hearing, here comes a criminal indictment. Now, the doctor’s lawyer is going to tell him to put the administrative appeal on hold because there are more serious matters to deal with. So what we have is the DEA forcing doctors to spend time and money to defend themselves at these administrative hearings, while the DEA uses that process to build a criminal indictment. And, of course, there are also state medical board hearings, so it’s a triple whammy, and it’s an abuse of civil proceedings by the DEA.”

[Further reading](http://www.aapsonline.org/press/nrhass.htm) from AAPS.

[A list of actions](http://www.aapsonline.org/painman/actionsagainst.htm) against some physicians.

The DEA can’t eliminate drug use, but fuck it, doctors are easier targets than criminals anyway, what with their public practice and deep pockets and compelling desire to stay in practice and all. :rolleyes: Fucking fish in a barrel, really.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DdDHellspawn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5e925/32.png) [@DdDHellspawn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DdDHellspawn)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2003, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/2 "2003-07-11T22:31:27Z")

</div>

DAMN the DEA and all other government agencies!!!

The war on drugs will NEVER be won. In fact I think that by now they should understand that they have failed miserably and spent billions of tax payers money in the process.

I’m sure there are some doctors out there who abuse their power and hook people up. But targeting every doctor who subscribe pain medicine is fucking wrong. :mad:

Are you going to start denying cancer patients there pain relievers? Or how about someone with a broken limb?

We should go back to the days without pain killers and just feed the patient alcohol before operating. :rolleyes:

Fight crack and crank. Try to stop heroine(sp?). 🆒 But pain medicines are a must.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![macabresoul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e68b1a/32.png) [@macabresoul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/macabresoul)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 1:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/3 "2003-07-12T01:03:38Z")

</div>

Seriously fucked up. Who are these DEA douche bags helping out in this situation? How can people be so think headed!?

Make physicians scared shitless of old people with a dibilitating illness in constant pain. Great job DEA shit-moppers, you win the award for dumbest plan of 2003.

:applause::

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brutus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@Brutus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brutus)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/4 "2003-07-12T01:07:42Z")

</div>

The sad thing is, the DEA has a large pool of very talented agents. You’d think some senator would make some hay with the suggestion that they would be better off fighting terrorism in the DHS…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![manhattan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/manhattan/32/7_2.png) [@manhattan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/manhattan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 1:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/5 "2003-07-12T01:32:33Z")

</div>

Not for nothing, but I’m not buying this “Association of American Physicians and Surgeons” as a legit medical orginization. [I can’t remember how much time he served, but he was excluded from Medicare and Medicaid](http://www.aapsonline.org/painman/actionsagainst.htm) ?? WTF? And the fact is that there _is_ a subset of doctors and not-doctors claiming to be docs prescribing pain drugs for non-pain applications. Whilst I’m sure the DEA is in fact making some errors here, I’m skeptical that it’s nearly as bad a claimed here.

Does someone have some background on this AAPS that would mark them as a legitimate organization (i.e., that a normal doctor might actually take their “advice?” Alternatively, is there another medical organization talking about this? I’d like to learn more before joining the jihad here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 2:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/6 "2003-07-12T02:01:17Z")

</div>

Frankly, I’m dubious of these claims. I took a 4 day seminar on prescribing controlled drugs. We heard from district attorneys, DEA agents and policymakers, and doctors who run legitimate pain clinics. They were uniform in stating that if proper medical procedure and documentation is used, including proper diagnosis, proper test results, and therapy plans, there **was no problem**.

Frankly, there are a number of my “colleagues” (I hate to call some of them that) do **not** practice good medicine, and see a high volume of patients to whom they give narcotic prescriptions with little evaluation or investigation. It can be quite lucrative, takes little office time or resources, and gets re-imbursed well. It’s also unethical, and illegal.

When I treat a chronic pain patient with opiates, I document what I believe to be the cause of the chronic pain, the studies performed to support this diagnosis and exclude other diagnoses, and I document possible other diagnoses and how I plan to evaluate for them. I document what medications and treatments they’ve had for their pain in the past, and the effectiveness of said treatments. I write down just why I am choosing a narcotic for them, the expected results, the anticipated length of need for them, and what I expect to do with their medication if further studies indicate they are _not_ warranted.

Often I get a patient new to me on opiate pain killers for chronic pain. I generally don’t take them off until I receive records about why they’re on them in the first place.

All this is a pain in the ass to do, but practicing good medicine is sometimes a pain in the ass. But if a practitioner takes these steps, I don’t believe they have anything to fear from regulatory authorities. And I am **not** the kind of guy who normally trusts regulatory authorities.

QtM, MD

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/7 "2003-07-12T02:28:01Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Often I get a patient new to me on opiate pain killers for chronic pain. I generally don’t take them off until I receive records about why they’re on them in the first place.

**QtM** , this seems to be one of the problems, though, that the [dubious] information above seems to warn against.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/8 "2003-07-12T02:58:56Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by erislover \*  
> \*\ ***QtM** , this seems to be one of the problems, though, that the [dubious] information above seems to warn against. \*\*

True, but I’m in a special circumstance, as a prison doc. I don’t have the luxury of saying to the patient: “sorry, find another doc, I don’t want to deal with this”. So I document that my narcotic treatment is presumptive, ie based on preliminary evidence or hypothesis that it is necessary, and that I am working towards obtaining further evidence. As long as I don’t prescribe to “maintain an addiction” which is not allowed, but rather “treat pain” it’s doable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mockingbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c68b51/32.png) [@Mockingbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mockingbird)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/9 "2003-07-12T04:11:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan \*  
> \*\*True, but I’m in a special circumstance, as a prison doc. I don’t have the luxury of saying to the patient: “sorry, find another doc, I don’t want to deal with this”. So I document that my narcotic treatment is presumptive, ie based on preliminary evidence or hypothesis that it is necessary, and that I am working towards obtaining further evidence. As long as I don’t prescribe to “maintain an addiction” which is not allowed, but rather “treat pain” it’s doable. \*\*

Not to mention that, I’d think you’d be concerned in some cases that there might be serious withdrawl and in some cases would go on a step down process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/10 "2003-07-12T12:40:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan \*  
> So I document that my narcotic treatment is presumptive, ie based on preliminary evidence or hypothesis that it is necessary, and that I am working towards obtaining further evidence. As long as I don’t prescribe to “maintain an addiction” which is not allowed, but rather “treat pain” it’s doable.

And the concern is, if one of your patients (pretending you aren’t in your current position) is a doctor-shopper, the DEA would be quite happy fucking you over while you were trying to get those tests rather than approach you and say, “We have a suspicion that one of your patients lies to doctors about their conditions in order to obtain narcotics.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/11 "2003-07-12T14:25:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Mockingbird \*  
> \*\*Not to mention that, I’d think you’d be concerned in some cases that there might be serious withdrawl and in some cases would go on a step down process. \*\*

Withdrawal I can deal with, once the decision is made that narcotics are not medically indicated. A rapid taper, or even cold-turkey, with the use of meds like clonidine to blunt the discomfort, is not a big deal. The nice thing about opiate withdrawal is that it is not life or health-threatening in and of itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/12 "2003-07-12T14:43:16Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by erislover \*  
> \*\*And the concern is, if one of your patients (pretending you aren’t in your current position) is a doctor-shopper, the DEA would be quite happy fucking you over while you were trying to get those tests rather than approach you and say, “We have a suspicion that one of your patients lies to doctors about their conditions in order to obtain narcotics.” \*\*

But I don’t see that happening out in the real world. The physicians who are getting entangled with the DEA or local district attorney (at least in the cases I’ve been aware of) have looooong histories of medicating tons of patients with narcotics for long periods of time, with inadequate documentation in their own notes.

I’m not saying over-zealous DA’s and others aren’t doing inappropriate things at times. I’m saying that if the physician follows the guidelines and documents, documents, documents, these things shouldn’t go far. I’ve worked with the district attorney for my own state medical board in the past, and he’s spoken quite clearly about what the medical board expects, and it mirrors what I’ve said. And while the board DA doesn’t have jurisdiction over the criminal courts, his opinion will definitely have some impact on whether the criminal courts pursue these things or not.

Frankly, the DEA’s primary interest vis a vis physicians seems to be to make sure drugs are not getting diverted to the streets for profit, which happens in the disreputable “pain-clinic mills”. They’ll pursue a physician who’s self-prescribing narcotics, but generally don’t care to follow further once said physician has gotten into drug treatment under the supervision of the medical board.

I just haven’t seen any statistics saying that this is a real issue for most practicing physicians. I’d expect to hear it from my advocacy groups like the American Academy of Family Practice, or my state Medical Society, or the American Society of Addiction Medicine. AAPS, which you cited, is not one of the bigger or well-known physician associations.

I’ll be going to a conference this summer whose focus is addiction medicine. I’ll ask some of the folks in the know there if this is an issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erislover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/71e660/32.png) [@erislover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/erislover)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/13 "2003-07-12T15:39:33Z")

</div>

Well that’s fair, **Qadgop** , I’d happily defer to your judgment over links I get from pro-legalization sites, but my cynicism about the DEA and drug war forbid me from thinking it is all on the up-and-up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/14 "2003-07-12T15:44:36Z")

</div>

Well, I think the drug war is damned stupid too, **erislover**. And I don’t trust our current administration to _not_ use extreme measures to advance their social agenda for all “right-thinking” people. So I do plan to check it out. And if the people I trust and who should be in the know about this sort of stuff agree that this is a problem, I will most assuredly oppose the official actions in this area.

Thanks for an interesting thread!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vibrotronica](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/a9a28c/32.png) [@vibrotronica](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vibrotronica)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/15 "2003-07-12T15:52:37Z")

</div>

[quote]  
The nice thing about opiate withdrawal is that it is not life or health-threatening in and of itself.

[quote]

Nice things about opiate withdrawl: 1  
Not-nice things about opiate withdrawl: 100,000

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/16 "2003-07-12T15:59:58Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by vibrotronica \*  
> \*\*Nice things about opiate withdrawl: 1  
> Not-nice things about opiate withdrawl: 100,000 \*\*

Would you prefer barbiturate withdrawal? Less unpleasant, but often ends with death.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/17 "2003-07-12T16:11:35Z")

</div>

What about Straight Dope withdrawal? :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/18 "2003-07-12T16:13:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Desmostylus \*  
> \*\*What about Straight Dope withdrawal? :eek: \*\*

Use the patch method. Tape a copy of one of the Straight Dope books to your abdomen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chief\_Crunch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e8c25b/32.png) [@Chief\_Crunch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chief_Crunch)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/19 "2003-07-12T16:19:23Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan \*  
> \*\*Would you prefer barbiturate withdrawal? Less unpleasant, but often ends with death. \*\*

Can you get this in writing for me? I got into an argument with my drug & alcohol therapist where she claimed alcohol and benzodiazepines are the only two drugs that cause mortality as a direct result of withdrawal. I mentioned barbiturates and she told me I wrong. The next time I saw her, she calimed to have confimed this in a medical journal that barbiturates interact with GABA receptors in a different manner than benzos and alcohol. I asked her “What medical journal?” and then she changed the subject saying I was using defense mechanisms and trying to be a “professional patient”. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2003, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795/20 "2003-07-12T16:26:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan \*  
> \*\*Use the patch method. Tape a copy of one of the Straight Dope books to your abdomen. \*\*

Shit. I _knew_ I was doing something wrong. Suppositories weren’t supposed to be _that_ big.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cute-now-the-dea-practices-medicine/187795.md?page=2)
