# Dangerous to be on a battleship when 16" guns are fired?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 27, 2023, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899 "2023-01-27T15:28:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 19\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/21 "2023-01-28T02:12:27Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> However, these shells were considered by US Navy pilots to be more of a visual spectacular than an effective AA weapon.

They are braver men than I.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/22 "2023-01-28T02:14:00Z")

</div>

> [@gnoitall](#):
>
> the dive bomber strike when it appeared undetected right above the carriers.

I was under the impression that the dive bombers were under quite a heavy fire. Let’s both find some links.

“No one knows for sure how many attacking SBDs were shot down at Midway, but it’s clear that 18 of the 47 dive bombers that struck the Japanese carriers that morning never made it back to their ships. Two more had to ditch near their carriers because the pilots were running too short on fuel to actually land. Some planes were shot from the sky, others crashed into the sea when they ran out of fuel. At least three aircrewmen were plucked from the sea by the Japanese and were interrogated and executed”

[Link](https://militaryhistorynow.com/2020/03/08/dive-bombers-at-midway-how-the-dauntless-sbd-turned-the-tide-in-the-pacific-wars-most-important-naval-battle/)

The torpedo bombers did indeed disrupt the Japanese.  
“By the time the Navy dive bombers arrived above the Japanese carriers, U.S. land-based and carrier-based planes had been engaging the Japanese formation nearly continuously for two hours. While no hits on the enemy vessels had been achieved, and more than 35 American aircraft had been shot down, the attacks had disrupted Japanese operations, scattered their ships, and had drawn Japanese fighter planes down to the surface of the sea.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnoitall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gnoitall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gnoitall)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 3:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/23 "2023-01-28T03:44:14Z")

</div>

Same link:

> [@](#):
>
> But now, at the last possible moment, three squadrons of SBD Dauntless dive bombers from the American aircraft carriers _[USS Yorktown](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_(CV-5))_ and _[USS Enterprise](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CV-6))_ had **arrived unobserved and unopposed in the skies above the Japanese fleet.**

> [@](#):
>
> At Midway, American commanders, desperate to strike the Japanese carriers before they could attack the U.S. fleet, sent their planes off in small groups as soon as they were launched. That decision doomed the torpedo bombers – 39 of 43 were shot down. But inadvertently the strikes opened the way for the **dive bombers to attack unhindered by Japanese fighters.**

(emphasis added)

The implication is that the Dauntlesses were attacked during or after their dive runs. They were still flying into heavy anti-aircraft fire and their escape would be contested by the Zeros, almost certainly recalled too late to try to prevent the bomber attack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/24 "2023-01-28T20:40:58Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> “No one knows for sure how many attacking SBDs were shot down at Midway, but it’s clear that 18 of the 47 dive bombers that struck the Japanese carriers that morning never made it back to their ships. Two more had to ditch near their carriers because the pilots were running too short on fuel to actually land. Some planes were shot from the sky, others crashed into the sea when they ran out of fuel.

My read was that running out of fuel was the cause of most of the Divebombers not getting back.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OttoDaFe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ottodafe/32/356_2.png) [@OttoDaFe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OttoDaFe)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/25 "2023-01-28T23:17:05Z")

</div>

One division of four SBDs from _Enterprise_’s scouting squadron (VS-6) under Lt Charles Ware headed out in a different direction after the attack and was never seen again, except by the Zeros escorting the _Hiryu_’s dive bomber attack. Apparently the fighter leader considered them easy pickings and got permission to go after them; none of the SBDs were downed, and they shot up two of the Zeros so badly that they had to return to base.

Closer to the point of the thread, as far as I’ve been able to tell only one of the SBDs in the 10:20 attack was lost to antiaircraft fire. This was by the _Kaga_, whose obsolete fire direction equipment was compensated for by a larger heavy AA battery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2023, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/26 "2023-01-29T14:56:35Z")

</div>

> [@OttoDaFe](#):
>
> Closer to the point of the thread, as far as I’ve been able to tell only one of the SBDs in the 10:20 attack was lost to antiaircraft fire. This was by the _Kaga_, whose obsolete fire direction equipment was compensated for by a larger heavy AA battery.

That’s my understanding. Ens. J. Q. Roberts was sixth in line on the attack on _Kaga_ and was the only dive-bomber bagged by an IJN carrier that day. As noted, they had 16 five-inch barrels in total, which is twice that of _Enterprise_ and more than the twelve 12 cm (4.7 in) large AA guns on _Akagi_.

However, lookouts on _Kaga_ (and the other carriers) were busy watching their CAP attacking _Yorktown_’s torpedo bomber squadron VT-3 and the six accompanying fighters lead by Jimmy Thach. This encounter was the first where the US fighters were able to hold their own against the more agile Zeros and drew away a large number of their fighters.

Zeros could climb more than 4,000 feet per minute so they could have been back up to proper altitude in five minutes. Their problem was less that they were down low but rather they had lost situational awareness and were not well coordinated. At this stage of the war, even the US was having problems coordinating CAP, but the Japanese had more problems.

The attack on _Hiryu_ in the evening also resulted in no SBD Dauntless dive bombers getting shot down by AA but I believe three were downed by Zeros in the attack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capn\_Carl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/838e76/32.png) [@Capn\_Carl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capn_Carl)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2023, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/27 "2023-01-30T13:21:14Z")

</div>

BTW, there’s a new WW2 Pacific naval battle podcast series on YouTube, many of them cohosted by Jon Parshall, all of them excellent. Here’s the first of the 3 on Midway:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/eCvI_OCIbQ4/maxresdefault.jpg "Episode 108: Calculated Risk-Prepping for The Battle of Midway with special guest Jon Parshall") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCvI_OCIbQ4)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2023, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/28 "2023-01-30T23:03:30Z")

</div>

So they did an episode “How real is it?” where they got an actual former senior USN officer to review naval scenes in movies and they discussed the scene in Under Siege where they shoot the main guns on the battleship, and he mentioned the danger from the blast of those guns (and how they clear the decks when firing because of over pressure from the guns):

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/k_LjfwrMr9I/maxresdefault.jpg "Navy Admiral Rates 8 Navy Warship Battles In Movies | How Real Is It?") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_LjfwrMr9I)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ASL\_v2.0](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asl_v2.0/32/3525_2.png) [@ASL\_v2.0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ASL_v2.0)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2023, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/29 "2023-01-30T23:29:05Z")

</div>

Interesting. Not saying he’s wrong, only cautioning that “former senior USN officer” only gets you so far as a credential without more details on service history.

I would expect senior officers in common to know how to salute and wear a uniform, but even there I would suspect some outliers/disagreement. Beyond that, I wouldn’t assume any given senior officer has cause or expertise sufficient to speak as an authority on anything at all unless they can back it up with something more. Even someone who served once on an actual battleship could be wrong about the specific nature of the hazard posed by firing main guns.

For example, there is a common misconception about why certain main propulsion shafts on a given CVN have different RPM limits relative to one another. A misconception common even among nuclear engineers trained and qualified to operate the main engines and control shaft speed.

All that to say, even when people know _what_ the restriction is, they very often still don’t know _why_ that is the case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ASL\_v2.0](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asl_v2.0/32/3525_2.png) [@ASL\_v2.0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ASL_v2.0)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2023, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/30 "2023-01-30T23:48:39Z")

</div>

Just missed the edit window, but for example… Admiral James Foggo III (featured in the video above) was a submarine officer. Never served on a battleship. No indication, or reason to expect, he ever served on a battleship. He is by no means a primary source

> **[James G. Foggo III](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_G._Foggo_III)**
>
> Pages for logged out editors learn more
> 
> James Gordon Foggo III MSC (born September 2, 1959) is a retired United States Navy admiral who last served as commander of United States Naval Forces Europe-Africa and commander of Allied Joint Force Command Naples. He previously served as the director of Navy Staff. Prior to that, he served as the commander of United States Sixth Fleet. He assumed his last assignment on October 20, 2017. On July 17, 2020, he relinquished command of United States...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnoitall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gnoitall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gnoitall)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2023, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/31 "2023-01-31T04:42:07Z")

</div>

Maybe he has extensive personal experience with the capital ship deck guns on the 688-class. 🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Precambrianmollusc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/precambrianmollusc/32/63_2.png) [@Precambrianmollusc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Precambrianmollusc)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2023, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/32 "2023-02-03T00:47:37Z")

</div>

On the subject of how damaging a battleships guns may be to themselves from the wiki on the battleship Rodney during the sinking of the Bismarck, for sure this was towards the business end of the barrel but serious issues . I remember reading it was also a problem on some other battle ships when the forward turrets were rotated to maximum ( can’t remember the term) pointing backwards and damaged the superstructure.  
King George class maybe?

Ironically, _Rodney_ ‘s own main guns firing at low [elevation](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elevation_(ballistics))had damaged her more extensively than had _Bismarck_ . Deck plates around the main-gun turrets had been depressed by the effects of the guns’ [muzzle blast](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzle_flash), and some of the structural members supporting them had cracked or buckled. Piping, [urinals](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urinal) and water mains had broken, while the shock of firing had loosened rivets and bolts in the hull plating, flooding various compartments. One gun in ‘A’ turret permanently broke down during the battle and two others in ‘B’ turret were temporarily disabled.[[48]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Rodney_(29)#cite_note-49)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KCB615](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ea666f/32.png) [@KCB615](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KCB615)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2023, 2:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/33 "2023-02-03T02:46:22Z")

</div>

> [@Precambrianmollusc](#):
>
> remember reading it was also a problem on some other battle ships when the forward turrets were rotated to maximum ( can’t remember the term) pointing backwards and damaged the superstructure.

“Firing over the shoulder.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2023, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/34 "2023-02-03T14:17:56Z")

</div>

Speaking of _Rodney_, naval engineering was a kind of iffy rule of thumb business in the late 1910s and early 1920s. Plus these ships’ designs were heavily affected by the Washington Naval Treaty. So much so that nearly everything about them was compromised to fit somehow or other under the many limbo bars the treaty imposed.

Even if constructed well, they were designed with little margin. And given the state of engineering analysis then, “little margin” very easily became “insufficient or no margin at all.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Precambrianmollusc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/precambrianmollusc/32/63_2.png) [@Precambrianmollusc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Precambrianmollusc)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2023, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/35 "2023-02-03T15:51:06Z")

</div>

They were petty wild looking ships but I kind of like them

Found the thing about pointing the guns aft

From the Wikipedia article and a mention of concussion of the eyeballs that doesn’t sound fun

When ‘X’ turret was fired 30 degrees abaft the beam and elevation of 40 degrees, considerable damage occurred to the two vertically stacked rows of bridge windows.[[13]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson-class_battleship#cite_note-13)As a result, the guns of “X” turret were usually prohibited from firing abaft of the beam at high elevations during peacetime practice firing. Fitting [tempered glass](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempered_glass) in the bridge windows was tried, but gun blast still shattered some of them and filled the bridge with flying debris. The design of the Captain’s bridge was altered on _Nelson_ circa 1930-33 to reduce the window area and enclose the upper portion of the previous two rows of glass. A great deal of effort was expended in correcting this problem, and fitting of protective ledges below the new smaller windows proved successful. A new enclosed Admiral’s bridge with its requisite reduced windows was built on top of the Captain’s bridge and the forward signalling lamps were moved up one level and towards the aft of the bridge. The Admiral’s bridge on _Rodney_ remained stepped back somewhat from the forward edge of the tower, but the Captain’s bridge had the same reduced area of glass that _Nelson_ now had, with larger ledges.[[3]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson-class_battleship#cite_note-ReferenceA-3) Blast was also a problem elsewhere; D.K. Brown tells of a test firing that was suspended when DNC observer H.S. Pengelly, who was beneath the foredeck, reported a bright red flash after firing all guns in “A” turret. This was later discovered to be caused by concussion of the observers’ eyeballs.[[4]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson-class_battleship#cite_note-referenceD-4)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2023, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/36 "2023-02-10T16:41:43Z")

</div>

Anecdotal: When I was in Vietnam, the New Jersey was active. At one point while I was there, they launched shells that passed over our base. Honestly, it sounded like a train passing over head.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnoitall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gnoitall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gnoitall)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2023, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/37 "2023-02-10T16:53:21Z")

</div>

The shells of the main battery of the _Iowa_-class have been compared to explosive Volkswagens with good reason.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Al128](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/al128/32/16541_2.png) [@Al128](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Al128)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2023, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/38 "2023-02-19T00:51:23Z")

</div>

here, some sort of first-hand-experience from our RU friends in UKR:

seems those pesky 4-5" guns already pack a bunch … also interesting anecdotical stories in this reddit thread:

> **[r/CombatFootage - Russian soldier hit by gun muzzle blast as tank fires. 2023](https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/115c5yf/russian_soldier_hit_by_gun_muzzle_blast_as_tank/)**
>
> 8,753 votes and 535 comments so far on Reddit

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2023, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899/39 "2023-02-20T03:42:54Z")

</div>

> [@Al128](#):
>
> here, some sort of first-hand-experience from our RU friends in UKR:
> 
> seems those pesky 4-5" guns already pack a bunch … also interesting anecdotical stories in this reddit thread:
> 
> [Reddit - Dive into anything](https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/115c5yf/russian_soldier_hit_by_gun_muzzle_blast_as_tank/)

That exact video is what I was going to comment on.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dangerous-to-be-on-a-battleship-when-16-guns-are-fired/978899.md?page=1)
