# Date Formats -  mm/dd/yy vs dd/mm/yy

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 12, 2004, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921 "2004-06-12T01:58:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hhf12345](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8e7dd6/32.png) [@hhf12345](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hhf12345)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/1 "2004-06-12T01:58:52Z")

</div>

Why did the mm/dd/yy format for writing dates become the standard in the U.S., as compared to the dd/mm/yy format in most of the rest of the world?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/2 "2004-06-12T02:03:33Z")

</div>

month-day-year was an acceptable form in 19th century Britain.

> [@](#):
>
> It is occasionally alleged that putting month before date in this way is an “Americanisation”; in which case it should be pointed out that this has been our style since the first issue of the Manchester Guardian on May 5 1821

> **[Guardian and Observer style guide: P](https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-observer-style-guide-p)**
>
> From pace to pyrrhic victory

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/3 "2004-06-12T02:17:56Z")

</div>

I think both formats suck. To eliminate confusion I always use characters for the month, e.g.

11-Jun-04

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sunspace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sunspace/32/1250_2.png) [@Sunspace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sunspace)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/4 "2004-06-12T02:23:30Z")

</div>

Same with me. For numbers, I just use the ISO standard: it’s the only one with the year first. 2004-06-11.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/5 "2004-06-12T02:24:24Z")

</div>

Nahh. Roman numerals for the month. 18.vii.1956

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/6 "2004-06-12T04:47:14Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> I think both formats suck. To eliminate confusion I always use characters for the month, e.g.
> 
> 11-Jun-04

That only eliminates confusion if all the readers speak the same language, since the “characters for the month” are different in various languages.

Sunspace’s example, using the ISO (International) standard works in all countries that use the 0…9 digits for numbers.

(Plus it proceeds in a logical largest-to-smallest manner: Century Year Month Day.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 11:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/7 "2004-06-12T11:43:12Z")

</div>

> [@Sunspace](#):
>
> Same with me. For numbers, I just use the ISO standard: it’s the only one with the year first. 2004-06-11.

Yea, but that still sucks. Does that refer to June 11th or November 6th?

This format:

11-Jun-04

Is 100% foolproof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 11:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/8 "2004-06-12T11:47:35Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> 11-Jun-04
> 
> Is 100% foolproof.

It’s already been mentioned that language is a problem. And in any case, is your example 2004, or 2011? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RM\_Mentock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e274bd/32.png) [@RM\_Mentock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RM_Mentock)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 12:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/9 "2004-06-12T12:24:19Z")

</div>

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> Yea, but that still sucks. Does that refer to June 11th or November 6th?

You gotta have some standards.

> [@](#):
>
> This format:
> 
> 11-Jun-04
> 
> Is 100% foolproof.

To reiterate GorillaMan’s point, does 11-Jun-04 refer to June 4, 2011, or to June 11, 2004? There’s always a bigger fool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/10 "2004-06-12T12:45:41Z")

</div>

We keep up with “which way is best?” and this’ll be sent straight to IMHO. I’d be interested in seeing a good answer to the question in the OP (how did it come to be MM/DD/YY in the U.S.?), as I’ve often wondered this myself. **GorillaMan** got us started by pointing out that it used to be this way in the U.K. as well. Maybe we can ammend the question to:

When and why did the U.K. change over to DD/MM/YY?

Worldwide, how are the different methods preferred?

P.S. MM/DD/YY is the best 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/11 "2004-06-12T13:00:31Z")

</div>

> [@bienville](#):
>
> **GorillaMan** got us started by pointing out that it used to be this way in the U.K. as well. Maybe we can ammend the question to:
> 
> When and why did the U.K. change over to DD/MM/YY?

My point wasn’t that the UK changed over, but that there was no conformity. As standards developed, the USA went one way and the UK the other. I don’t think there’s any ‘explanation’, it just happened that way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/12 "2004-06-12T13:10:38Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> I don’t think there’s any ‘explanation’, it just happened that way.

Aww, you’ll never fight ignorance with that attitude, young man. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![coop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/87869e/32.png) [@coop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/coop)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/13 "2004-06-12T13:19:16Z")

</div>

Here in God’s country (Oz,) we use DD/MM/CCYY which equates to the following:

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> 11-Jun-04

To me, it is easier to remember:

The nth day of the nth month of the year in question…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![China\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@China\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/China_Guy)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/14 "2004-06-12T14:02:12Z")

</div>

I have worked internationally for nearly 20 years. I always write out the month and usually 4 digits for the year. The US system of month day year just lends itself to confusion, especially to anyone else where the standard is year month day or day month year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/15 "2004-06-12T20:56:29Z")

</div>

The different formats in the UK ans USA seem related to the spoken date format; _most_ people in the UK will speak _most_ dates in the format “The fifth of December”, whereas it is my impression that on the other side of the pond, it is more common to say “December fifth” (there are exceptions to this, I’m sure).

Is the spoken parallel here:  
-Imaginary (on my part)?  
-Coincidental?  
-The cause?  
-The effect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e36b37/32.png) [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airman_Doors_USAF)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/16 "2004-06-12T21:02:12Z")

</div>

I use military standards for both date and time, and I invariably catch hell for doing so. You’d think that if I wrote down 12 Jun 04, 1659 it would be easy to figure out. Alas, they can’t, so I have to change everything to suit their lack of math skills.

The OPs question was really a variation on “Why are people dumb?”, to which I can honestly say that I have no idea, although it annoys the hell out of me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@wolfman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfman)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2004, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/17 "2004-06-12T21:10:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> That only eliminates confusion if all the readers speak the same language, since the “characters for the month” are different in various languages.

I am wondering if you are a DBA because that point was driven home to me very strongly through Oracle.

We were expanding an Oracle application to other countries, and it started erroring out when we went to a different NLS envronment. It took me about three weeks and 80% of my sanity to finally figure out that it was the month abbreviations crapping out where a case statment had been coded to read a number and throw in the string.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flapcats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7993a0/32.png) [@flapcats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flapcats)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2004, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/18 "2004-06-13T01:23:05Z")

</div>

"You’d think that if I wrote down 12 Jun 04, 1659 it would be easy to figure out. "

I can count, but I don’t get it. ‘1659’ = 12/06/04?  
Next is an ‘IMHO’ - and so I risk this thread being deported. I think the most likely answer so far is the literarl translation of what people say:

Here in the UK someone will say ‘The thirteenth of June two thousand and four’  
Where as across the pond they’d say ‘June thirteenth two thousand and four’

Those are written down differently and so the abbreviation is also different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Padeye](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@Padeye](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Padeye)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2004, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/19 "2004-06-13T01:36:49Z")

</div>

The YYYY/MM/DD and optionally HH:MM:SS format where the numbers are ordered from most significant digit to least is useful because it can be stored as an ordinary number and correctly sorted without resorting to special date routines. The last company I worked for used an ERP system that stored dates that way. The crippling drawback to storing dates as plain text was that an invalid date could be stored which really threw a spanner in the works when pulling data to a data warehouse that used true date format fields.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2004, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921/20 "2004-06-13T01:45:38Z")

</div>

> [@flapcats](#):
>
> "You’d think that if I wrote down 12 Jun 04, 1659 it would be easy to figure out. "
> 
> I can count, but I don’t get it. ‘1659’ = 12/06/04?

I think he means 1659 = 4:59 PM

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/date-formats-mm-dd-yy-vs-dd-mm-yy/249921.md?page=2)
