# dealing with SOs sexual issues (fake Os etc)?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dealing-with-sos-sexual-issues-fake-os-etc/697378>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [September 3, 2014, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dealing-with-sos-sexual-issues-fake-os-etc/697378 "2014-09-03T16:35:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![choie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/choie/32/7829_2.png) [@choie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/choie)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dealing-with-sos-sexual-issues-fake-os-etc/697378/27 "2014-09-04T22:10:17Z")

</div>

And also, what your saying now _is_ incompatible with the following that you told us in the other thread:

> [@Bring up inconsistencies to sig. other?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bring-up-inconsistencies-to-sig-other/695031/36):
>
> Isn’t this just a perfect set up for a woman that wants a steady boyfriend to give her emotional support and sex a few times a week while allowing her to do whatever she would like?

Sex a few times a week? Apparently she doesn’t want sex _at all_. So why would you call this a perfect set-up?

Meanwhile, when asked if maybe your girlfriend just wants a fuckbuddy, you wrote:

> [@Bring up inconsistencies to sig. other?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/bring-up-inconsistencies-to-sig-other/695031/39):
>
> Maybe.
> 
> She states that she loves me and is exclusive.

So you were willing to consider that _maybe_ she wants a fuckbuddy… a woman whom you now say doesn’t even initiate or want sex?

How can we help you if you’re giving off such mixed messages?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/dealing-with-sos-sexual-issues-fake-os-etc/697378)._