Dear Weirdo: please curb your so-called "service dog"

You are correct but incomplete:[

](A Service Animal and Public Places)Nevada has a law about misrepresenting an animal as a service animal, too:[

](NRS 426.805 Fraudulent misrepresentation of animal as service animal or service animal in training unlawful; penalty. :: Chapter 426 Persons With Disabilities :: TITLE 38 PUBLIC WELFARE :: 2010 Nevada Revised Statutes :: Nevada Revised Statutes :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia)
Frankly, I think it should be part of the deal that a person has to be able to provide proof that an animal is a service animal. I can’t see that being a burdensome regulation, but I’d be willing to be hear how I might be wrong about that.

Otherwise, like SteveG1 and Springtime For Spacers, I want a humongous and/or deadly service animal. Or maybe just Service Hornets or something. :smiley:

Sorta like demanding trans people whip out their ID upon your request before entering the bathroom.

:confused:

You equate trans people with animals?

:eek:

Do you expect the dog to present an ID upon request? :eek::eek:

That’s twice now that you’ve equated people with animals.

No you. Who is supposed to prove something, the dog, or the person you’re oppressing because you live such a privileged life you have nothing better to do? My neighbor has a service dog. He has PTSD. Yes, a white people disease that must drive you cray cray.

And if they do, it’s because they are very sick or something else is wrong with them.

A women I went to junior high with (ETA in the mid 1970s) has been legally blind since birth (her parents insisted she be mainstreamed because they believed - correctly - that she was not handicapped) and a few years ago, she successfully sued a taxicab company because a driver wouldn’t let her dog ride with her. :mad: Believe me, you can tell just by looking at her that she is blind. She wears very thick glasses to enhance what little vision she does have.

But yeah, people who have “service” iguanas, parakeets, etc.? Get real. :rolleyes:

No, sorta nothing like that at all. In fact, what a stupid fucking thing to say.

Most jurisdictions are quite specific about what animals may (or may not) be considered to be a “service animal”. No, in most places, you cannot simply decide all by yourself that you need a fluffy companion, and then businesses must let you take your pooch wherever you go. Nor can you simply get a doctors note and then take your pooch to whatever business you like.

Regulations exist that specifically define “service animals”

Thank God in my area, there are regulations:

In other words, your random mutt that shits on the carpet of a casino is not a suitable service animal.

Holy fuck, have you lost your mind or just gone on a bender of some kind?

Shouldn’t your name be Bob?

:stuck_out_tongue:

WTF? What about the ‘stress disorders’ that the staff in (any) establishment have to deal with cleaning up fuckng DOG SHIT? Y’know, if you are THAT stressed (and your dog is a shitter) then you get to stay home. Simple.

My disability does not override YOUR right to a shit-free walk through the Casino/Post Office/Walmart.

FFS :dubious:

Not like it at all, actually. Transgender people don’t have any impact on bathrooms that may make it more difficult for other people to use them. Pet owners who take their pets into public places, on the other hand, are potentially causing nontrivial allergy, hygiene, safety, and/or nuisance problems for other people.

A more apt analogy would be if transgender people (or any other group of people) for some reason had a serious medical need to, say, smoke cigarettes everywhere they went. They should still be allowed to use public places like anybody else, but they might well be required to show their MandatorySmoker card to prove that they weren’t just some asshole faking a medical condition to get around no-smoking regulations.

Likewise, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to request that people with pets in public places should be able to show some kind of ServiceAnimal card to prove that they aren’t just assholes faking a medical condition to get around no-pets regulations.

Mind you, I personally have no dog (heh) in this fight: I don’t really care if there are pets in restaurants, on the bus, wherever, as long as they’re suitably restrained and well-behaved. But a lot of other people do care, and consequently we have pretty stringent no-pets regulations in most public places.

Either obey the law or get the law changed, but don’t try to sneak around the law by using genuinely disabled people as your cover. That’s being a jerk.

Well, legit service dogs can screw up. We saw one poop on the floor in Safeway, at the meat counter, leaving a whole little trail there, and the owner just walked right on. I mean, yeah, she was blind, but presumably she had a sense of smell.

A former coworker (temp, fortunately) somehow scammed HR into allowing her to bring her comfort husky into our office every day. It was cute, but quite unnecessary. Not particularly well-behaved, either.

I often feel like the only person in Australia who isn’t particularly fond of dogs. I don’t hate them but at best I’m “oh, hai” towards them - so I can sort of sympathise with the OP.

Seeing-eye dogs provide a vital service and should absolutely be allowed anywhere their owner is. But I raise my eyebrow at “service animals” just because someone wants to bring their pet with them everywhere.

Boy, if THAT anecdote doesn’t set off ambivalence triggers for the OP…

So the impression I’m getting is that dogs are the only animal that is eligible for either/any of these roles (seeing eye and service)?

I’m rather surprised at such an amount of ableist bullshit on this forum, given the general preponderance of leftie SJWs.

We’ll change his name to “Mat."

Have you heard about Panda, the guide horse?

Horses are smart and trainable and domesticated, just like dogs. They also can live about three times as long as a Labrador!

I met Alex Kurland, Panda’s trainer, last year. A fascinating woman.