# Democracy - The example of Switzerland

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [February 8, 2010, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158 "2010-02-08T17:16:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![regularjack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b5ac83/32.png) [@regularjack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/regularjack)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/1 "2010-02-08T17:16:16Z")

</div>

In the article ‘Is the U.S. a democracy or a republic? What’s the difference?’ it was pointed out that direct involvment of the people in the government on a day-to-day basis is impractical. This is true. However, one should mention the example of Switzerland. Any swiss citizen who wants to introduce a new law or change an existing one, can do so by taking the initiative to organize a referendum. In order to set up an official referendum, the organising comittee needs to gather a certain amount of votes in a certain time. Then a date is defined for that referendum by the government. If 50% or more vote ‘yes’ then the law is established. This is an example of direct involvement of people in the government. The participation of voters varies from initiative to initiative but by no means are swiss people ‘sick’ of too much voting. They are actually proud of this system.

regularjack

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/2 "2010-02-08T18:29:01Z")

</div>

Citizens can do that in most of the US, too. The exact numbers needed, and the scope of what a referendum can do, vary from state to state, but I’ve never heard of a state that didn’t have such a mechanism at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/3 "2010-02-08T18:37:25Z")

</div>

[A link to the column in question](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1710/is-the-u-s-a-democracy-or-a-republic-whats-the-difference).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2010, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/4 "2010-02-08T20:12:28Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> but I’ve never heard of a state that didn’t have such a mechanism at all.

Minnesota is one.

There is no initiative or referendum process in state government at all. There have been 3 attempts to add this to the state constitution (latest in 1980), but they all failed to pass the voters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/5 "2010-02-09T03:37:48Z")

</div>

I don’t believe there is any way to do so in New York, at least I’ve never heard anybody even raise the possibility of one. Given that we famously have The Most Dysfunctional Legislature in the Nation™ people here would leap and claw at the slightest shred of such a possibility.

Of course, there is not even the tiniest similarity between referendums and day-to-day governing. It is an utterly false comparison.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Civil\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d78d45/32.png) [@Civil\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Civil_Guy)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 4:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/6 "2010-02-09T04:24:43Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> I don’t believe there is any way to do so in New York, at least I’ve never heard anybody even raise the possibility of one. Given that we famously have The Most Dysfunctional Legislature in the Nation™ people here would leap and claw at the slightest shred of such a possibility.
> 
> Of course, there is not even the tiniest similarity between referendums and day-to-day governing. It is an utterly false comparison.

_New York_ has the most dysfunctional legislature. Trademarked, no less. This Californian stands (okay, sits) corrected.😃 Anyhow, if you do need any propositions on the ballot, let us know, and we’ll go ahead and put them on our ballot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/46a35a/32.png) [@Tim\_T-Bonham.net](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tim_T-Bonham.net)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 7:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/7 "2010-02-09T07:21:32Z")

</div>

> [@regularjack](#):
>
> However, one should mention the example of Switzerland. Any swiss citizen who wants to introduce a new law or change an existing one, can do so by taking the initiative to organize a referendum. In order to set up an official referendum, the organising comittee needs to gather a certain amount of votes in a certain time. Then a date is defined for that referendum by the government. If 50% or more vote ‘yes’ then the law is established. This is an example of direct involvement of people in the government.

In practice here in the USA, referendums are hardly ‘direct involvement of the people’.

Referendums are generally the work of a specific, dedicated group, usually funded by a specific special interest (often corporate).

In California, where they have dozens of referendums every election, there are firms that specialize in the work needed to pass a referendum. They will collect the signatures needed to get it on the ballot for you (there is even a standard price per signature). There are PR firms that will form a fake grassroots (‘astroturf’) organization, find (& pay) prominent people to be spokespersons, produce press releases, organize rallies, produce advertising, etc. All a standard task, with records of accomplishment for other referendums.

Such referendums are far different from direct actions of the citizens!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/8 "2010-02-09T17:35:12Z")

</div>

> [@Civil\_Guy](#):
>
> _New York_ has the most dysfunctional legislature. Trademarked, no less. This Californian stands (okay, sits) corrected.😃 Anyhow, if you do need any propositions on the ballot, let us know, and we’ll go ahead and put them on our ballot.

[Political scientists who study these things](http://www.thealbanyproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=36) have anointed New York as number one. As New Yorkers are wont to do, we merely duck our heads and scruff our toes in demure acknowledgment of yet another example of our superiority. We wouldn’t rub it in your faces or anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![muldoonthief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muldoonthief/32/3188_2.png) [@muldoonthief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/muldoonthief)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/9 "2010-02-09T19:11:46Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> [Political scientists who study these things](http://www.thealbanyproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=36) have anointed New York as number one. As New Yorkers are wont to do, we merely duck our heads and scruff our toes in demure acknowledgment of yet another example of our superiority. We wouldn’t rub it in your faces or anything.

From the link:

“In an exhaustive 56 page study, The Brennan Center for Justice at **New York University’s School of Law** illustrated in depressing detail how truly F-ed up our State’s Senate and Assembly have become.”

(my bolding)

So New Yorkers anointed themselves the greatest and best in yet another category. Color me surprised.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2010, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/10 "2010-02-09T19:45:37Z")

</div>

> [@muldoonthief](#):
>
> From the link:
> 
> “In an exhaustive 56 page study, The Brennan Center for Justice at **New York University’s School of Law** illustrated in depressing detail how truly F-ed up our State’s Senate and Assembly have become.”
> 
> (my bolding)
> 
> So New Yorkers anointed themselves the greatest and best in yet another category. Color me surprised.

Is it one you want to fight them for? 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slow_moving_vehicle/32/291_2.png) [@Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slow_Moving_Vehicle)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2010, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/11 "2010-02-10T23:08:11Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> I don’t believe there is any way to do so in New York, at least I’ve never heard anybody even raise the possibility of one. Given that we famously have The Most Dysfunctional Legislature in the Nation™ people here would leap and claw at the slightest shred of such a possibility.

Look, Yankee-boy, has _your_ state lege ever tried to annex part of a neighboring state? No? Didn’t think so. _Mine_ has.

[http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/feb/08/east-ridge-chattanooga-become-part-georgia/](http://http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/feb/08/east-ridge-chattanooga-become-part-georgia/)

Come to think of it, Georgia’s problem is not that the Legislature is dysfunctional but quite the opposite; it’s far _too_ functional…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/12 "2010-02-11T01:20:20Z")

</div>

> [@slowmovingvehicle](#):
>
> Look, Yankee-boy, has _your_ state lege ever tried to annex part of a neighboring state? No? Didn’t think so. _Mine_ has.
> 
> [http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/feb/08/east-ridge-chattanooga-become-part-georgia/](http://http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/feb/08/east-ridge-chattanooga-become-part-georgia/)
> 
> Come to think of it, Georgia’s problem is not that the Legislature is dysfunctional but quite the opposite; it’s far _too_ functional…

And if you Georgia turks think you’re gonna take our land, line on a map or no, you’ve got another thing coming. (Namely, our bullets!) 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Powers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/edb3f5/32.png) [@Powers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Powers)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/13 "2010-02-11T02:36:31Z")

</div>

> [@slowmovingvehicle](#):
>
> Look, Yankee-boy, has _your_ state lege ever tried to annex part of a neighboring state? No? Didn’t think so. _Mine_ has.

Well there was that dispute with New Hampshire that resulted in the creation of Vermont. =)

And for the record, the plural of “referendum” is “referenda”, and it’s “another _think_ coming”, not “another _thing_ coming”.

Powers &8^]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 3:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/14 "2010-02-11T03:34:46Z")

</div>

> [@Powers](#):
>
> Well there was that dispute with New Hampshire that resulted in the creation of Vermont. =)
> 
> And for the record, the plural of “referendum” is “referenda”, and it’s “another _think_ coming”, not “another _thing_ coming”.
> 
> Powers &8^]

Sorry to bust your bubble, but [_referendums_ is now an officially accepted plural form](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/referendum). As with so many things, misuse has become proper use. :smack:

Note also the [considerable evidentiary dispute as to which came first, “thing” or “think”.](http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004971.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncertain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Uncertain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncertain)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/15 "2010-02-11T04:06:30Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> Sorry to bust your bubble

Doesn’t one traditionally _burst_ a bubble?

> [@](#):
>
> _referendums_ is now an officially accepted plural form. As with so many things, misuse has become proper use. :smack:

I thought we were writing in English, not Latin. When you start using _penes_, then we can talk. How you will form the plural of _agenda_ I cannot imagine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Icarus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icarus/32/72_2.png) [@Icarus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icarus)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/16 "2010-02-11T15:04:40Z")

</div>

> [@t-bonham@scc.net](#):
>
> In practice here in the USA, referendums are hardly ‘direct involvement of the people’.
> 
> Referendums are generally the work of a specific, dedicated group, usually funded by a specific special interest (often corporate).
> 
> In California, where they have dozens of referendums every election, there are firms that specialize in the work needed to pass a referendum. They will collect the signatures needed to get it on the ballot for you (there is even a standard price per signature). There are PR firms that will form a fake grassroots (‘astroturf’) organization, find (& pay) prominent people to be spokespersons, produce press releases, organize rallies, produce advertising, etc. All a standard task, with records of accomplishment for other referendums.
> 
> Such referendums are far different from direct actions of the citizens!

Well, you describe the mechanisms and industry in place to achieve a referendum, but the basis is still the ability of citizens to initiate the process. At least in California there is no inherent barrier to a citizen initiated referendum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slow_moving_vehicle/32/291_2.png) [@Slow\_Moving\_Vehicle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slow_Moving_Vehicle)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2010, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/17 "2010-02-11T18:17:15Z")

</div>

> [@Powers](#):
>
> And for the record, the plural of “referendum” is “referenda”, and it’s “another _think_ coming”, not “another _thing_ coming”.

We’re talking about the Legislature of Georgia, so there’s no thinking involved.  
And **smiling bandit** , I’ve long felt the way to resolve this water war was for the Guv to call out the National Guard, invade Alabama, annex Florida and lease it to the Canadians. Boom! Water woes _and_ budget crisis solved in one fell swoop!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2010, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/18 "2010-02-12T18:47:56Z")

</div>

> [@Uncertain](#):
>
> Doesn’t one traditionally _burst_ a bubble?
> 
> I thought we were writing in English, not Latin. When you start using _penes_, then we can talk. How you will form the plural of _agenda_ I cannot imagine.

We are writing in English. Which is why insisting upon using a Latin pluralising ending for what is now an accepted English word is arguably silly. Thus, I said use “referendums”, not “referenda.” 😉

The plural of agenda is agendas. Only someone really silly would insist upon calling them agendae.

And yes, _burst_ would be correct. The grammatical corallary to Gaudere’s Principle manages to bite me. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Excellent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f19dbf/32.png) [@Mr.Excellent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Excellent)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2010, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/19 "2010-02-12T19:20:43Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> The plural of agenda is agendas. Only someone really silly would insist upon calling them agendae.

Wouldn’t our hypothetical silly person be likelier to insist that “agenda” _is_ the plural form, and that one should probably refer to “the agendum of the meeting”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2010, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158/20 "2010-02-12T20:43:34Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Excellent](#):
>
> Wouldn’t our hypothetical silly person be likelier to insist that “agenda” _is_ the plural form, and that one should probably refer to “the agendum of the meeting”?

Not in English.

[agenda](http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=agenda&searchmode=none)

> [@](#):
>
> 1650s, from L., lit. “things to be done,” from neut. pl. of agendum, gerundive of agere (see act). Originally theological (opposed to matters of belief), sense of “items of business to be done at a meeting” first attested 1882

.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democracy-the-example-of-switzerland/528158.md?page=2)
