# Democrats' fiscal plans circa 2000

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 29, 2007, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976 "2007-05-29T19:29:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2007, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/1 "2007-05-29T19:29:53Z")

</div>

Somwhere along the line I got the impression that had the Democrats won in 2000, they would have spent about 1/3 of the Clinton budget surplus on tax cuts, 1/3 on paying down the national debt, and 1/3 on new spending such as energy independance and education.

Am I incorrect on this? Did most Dems support raising taxes instead?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2007, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/2 "2007-05-29T20:49:08Z")

</div>

There’s no possible way to tell. Remember that the Republicans held a nine-seat majority in the House in the 107th Congress. So even if Gore had won, whatever plans the Democrats might have had would be subject to compromise with the Republicans to get any bills passed.

If you’re postulating both that Gore won and that the Democrats took Congress, that’s a lot of changes. What would have happened then is anyone’s guess.

If you think I’m avoiding the issue of campaign promises and pledges, you’re right. Everybody in the real world avoids them, so why shouldn’t I? (Seriously, look at what every president has said before taking office and what really happened. There is about zero correlation.)

If you really want a “what might have happened if” thread, you need to start one in GD. There are no factual answers to this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2007, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/3 "2007-05-29T21:08:13Z")

</div>

You can see what you can glean from the [2000 Democratic National Platform](http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/www.democrats.org/pdfs/2000platform.pdf) (pdf). But as **Exapno** says, it is not going to show you the details on specific bills or budgets that the Democrats would have pursued if they’d won.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2007, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/4 "2007-05-29T21:53:06Z")

</div>

The [Gore/Lieberman](http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/06/gore.economic.plan/gore_prosperity.pdf) budget proposal from the 2000 campaign. Skip down to the addendum on plans for the budget surplus. As stated, there’s no guarantee that any of this would have been agreed to by a Republican (or even a Democratic) Congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2007, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/5 "2007-05-29T22:03:10Z")

</div>

Table A on p. 179 makes it clear that no 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 allocation was planned, even if just the on-budget surplus is considered.

It also reminds me of how much I hate having to parse federal budgeting. :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/6 "2007-05-30T03:20:35Z")

</div>

Thanks. I’ll peruse some of those links.

I think this a rough summary of what I gleaned from left-leaning punditry back then. I’m not talking exact thirds so much as a basic breakdown of budget priorities. To simplify the question even further, did the Democrats _want_ to spend some of the Clinton surplus on tax cuts, or did they _want_ to raise taxes?

Or are they part of a vast conspiracy to implement socialism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rico](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rico/32/3582_2.png) [@Rico](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rico)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/7 "2007-05-30T03:24:05Z")

</div>

\<mod\>

Think of this as a vast mod conspiracy to keep political threads in GD.

Moved.

\</mod\>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/8 "2007-05-30T04:04:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=sqweels]  
To simplify the question even further, did the Democrats _want_ to spend some of the Clinton surplus on tax cuts, or did they _want_ to raise taxes?  
[/quote]

It doesn’t matter what “the Democrats” wanted to do, it only matters what **Gore** wanted to do.

[QUOTE=sqweels]  
Or are they part of a vast conspiracy to implement socialism?  
[/quote]

:eek: Comrades, he’s onto us! Implement the Omega Contingency Plan! Yes, yes, I **know** how hard it is to find a sacrificial virgin this time of night! Just do it!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/9 "2007-05-30T04:42:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Rico]  
\<mod\>

Think of this as a vast mod conspiracy to keep political threads in GD.

Moved.

\</mod\>  
[/QUOTE]

Fair enough, but you wouldn’t think it’s such a tough question. Either they would have raised 'em, lowered 'em, or kept 'em the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mosier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ea924/32.png) [@Mosier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mosier)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 6:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/10 "2007-05-30T06:26:07Z")

</div>

I don’t remember any democrat putting forth a plan to lower taxes with the Clinton surplus. Wasn’t Gore talking about health care and education pretty much exclusively?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/11 "2007-05-30T06:27:13Z")

</div>

If you can’t find a sacrificial virgin, use a sacrificial **slut!** Lord SatanMarx ain’t picky!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/12 "2007-05-30T06:28:38Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mosier]  
I don’t remember any democrat putting forth a plan to lower taxes with the Clinton surplus. Wasn’t Gore talking about health care and education pretty much exclusively?  
[/QUOTE]

IIRC, yes, which was as it should have been, and as it should be now. What is your point?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mosier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ea924/32.png) [@Mosier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mosier)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 6:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/13 "2007-05-30T06:30:14Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]  
IIRC, yes, which was as it should have been, and as it should be now. What is your point?  
[/QUOTE]

Just trying to answer the OP. I wasn’t making a judgment call.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [May 30, 2007, 11:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-fiscal-plans-circa-2000/405976/14 "2007-05-30T11:43:19Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mosier]  
I don’t remember any democrat putting forth a plan to lower taxes with the Clinton surplus. Wasn’t Gore talking about health care and education pretty much exclusively?  
[/QUOTE]  
Erm, I remember that Gore was talking about a middle class tax cut of about $480 billion. [Cite.](http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa100600a.htm)
