# Democrats Strip Superdelegates Of Power In Historic Reform Vote

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [August 25, 2018, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264 "2018-08-25T18:52:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing\_Fish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Thing\_Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing_Fish)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/81 "2018-08-29T21:25:14Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> If the voters had been smarter they would have picked Clinton over Trump.

No argument there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/82 "2018-08-29T21:39:12Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> This is simply not true yet you and others here keep spreading it. While we can never know for certain all available evidence suggests Sanders would have beaten Trump.
> 
> - 
> 
> As to the OP many in this thread have dismissed the effect superdelegates had on the race. That is true only when you look at the final outcome at the convention.
> 
> The whole “Clinton stole the election from Sanders” bit has been done on this message board and it is clear the DNC had its thumb on the scale for Clinton all along and not even just a little bit. The issue with the superdelegates was after a primary and Sanders was still in the race and a contender the media would report the delegate count and include the superdelegates which made it seem as if Clinton had the race all locked-up. This would have a chilling effect on people coming out to vote. Why would they go to vote for Sanders if it is a lost cause already?
> 
> Clinton lost to a dark horse candidate with Obama. There was no way in hell she was going to let it happen again with Sanders and she managed that by tilting the playing field. The use of superdelegates was one of those (but not the only one).

All of that is before the Kremlin and karl started their attacks on Bernie. After they “proved” Bernie was a card carrying Commie, how much of that would still be true?

So, yeah, until the GOP started attacking Bernie with Fake news and half truths, that was so.

It is not clear. And see, like I said- the Bernie-bros just wont give up on “the election was stole!” routine, which is totally false. Hillary won on all measures.

Yeah, undoubtedly a few voters didnt back Sanders due to the Superdelegates- so?

Superdelegates were not something new for 2016, they had been around for a while. The same thing happened with Obama but he won. The Superdelegates were just as “unfair” or fair as Bernies use of the undemocratic caucuses. If Bernie hadnt "cheated’ by winning those in defiance of what the popular polling was, he never would have been a contender.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/83 "2018-08-29T22:14:18Z")

</div>

I absolutely agree that Rove et al would have attacked Sanders just as energetically as they did Clinton. But I disagree that the attacks would have been as effective. Call him a socialist? Sure, he’d welcome the free publicity.

And despite being a Sanders supporter myself, I don’t see that there’s any problem with the fact that the party leadership put their thumb on the scale in favor of Clinton. I’d have preferred that they do so for Sanders, but scale-thumbing isn’t a problem. It’s the job of the party leadership to, well, lead the party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/84 "2018-08-29T22:17:16Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> And despite being a Sanders supporter myself, I don’t see that there’s any problem with the fact that the party leadership put their thumb on the scale in favor of Clinton. I’d have preferred that they do so for Sanders, but scale-thumbing isn’t a problem. It’s the job of the party leadership to, well, lead the party.

From what I remember, it’s in the party’s charter that the DNC not favour a candidate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/85 "2018-08-29T22:53:16Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I absolutely agree that Rove et al would have attacked Sanders just as energetically as they did Clinton. But I disagree that the attacks would have been as effective. Call him a socialist? Sure, he’d welcome the free publicity.
> 
> And despite being a Sanders supporter myself, I don’t see that there’s any problem with the fact that the party leadership put their thumb on the scale in favor of Clinton. I’d have preferred that they do so for Sanders, but scale-thumbing isn’t a problem. It’s the job of the party leadership to, well, lead the party.

Sure a socialist, and well, frankly that’s not false. And not so horrible but a little bit unelectable.

But they’d call him a _Communist_. They’d have pictures of him at a rally, and a copy of his card.

And the issues with his tax return, and his wife and her college, and …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/86 "2018-08-29T23:14:07Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> And despite being a Sanders supporter myself, I don’t see that there’s any problem with the fact that the party leadership put their thumb on the scale in favor of Clinton. I’d have preferred that they do so for Sanders, but scale-thumbing isn’t a problem. It’s the job of the party leadership to, well, lead the party.

Funny then that they went to the trouble they did to tilt the playing field if it amounts to not much. So far in fact that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile lost their jobs over it. And all for nothing?

Nah, they did it because it mattered. The one thing Sanders needed was to be seen as a credible contender and they did their best to prevent that. We cannot know how it might have played out differently but you can be certain they did not do all they did just for the lols.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/87 "2018-08-29T23:16:45Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Sure a socialist, and well, frankly that’s not false. And not so horrible but a little bit unelectable.
> 
> But they’d call him a _Communist_. They’d have pictures of him at a rally, and a copy of his card.
> 
> And the issues with his tax return, and his wife and her college, and …

So I gave you a pile of data and expert opinions that Sanders would have beat Trump but apparently you think they did not consider that Trump would have called him a communist? :rolleyes:

This is what Trump supporters do. You hand them a pile of data and they merrily keep believing the opposite because fake-news and they know better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/88 "2018-08-29T23:32:39Z")

</div>

Who said that it didn’t amount to much? Of course it did. I didn’t say that it didn’t amount to much, just that I thought it was legitimate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/89 "2018-08-29T23:34:59Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> So I gave you a pile of data and expert opinions that Sanders would have beat Trump but apparently you think they did not consider that Trump would have called him a communist? :rolleyes:.

Which of the polls you linked asked the question “If Trump called Sanders a Communist, who would you vote for?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/90 "2018-08-29T23:40:29Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> Which of the polls you linked asked the question “If Trump called Sanders a Communist, who would you vote for?”

I do not know what they asked in the poll but probably not that. So? Do you think Trump’s pollster didn’t know the guy he was working for when he gave his opinion? Do you think Sanders, in a 35 year political career, hasn’t had the “communist” moniker leveled at him? Or do you think Dr Deth and Trump would have been the first ones and no one in all the links given above (and I have more if you want) had not considered that Trump might try to smear his opponent?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/91 "2018-08-29T23:47:02Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> So I gave you a pile of data and expert opinions that Sanders would have beat Trump but apparently you think they did not consider that Trump would have called him a communist? :rolleyes:

All you gave is polls. And opinions, in fact showing that Tony Fabrizio says Sanders would have won is proof that Trump would have loved Sanders as a opponent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/92 "2018-08-29T23:50:06Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Who said that it didn’t amount to much? Of course it did. I didn’t say that it didn’t amount to much, just that I thought it was legitimate.

Well, it went directly counter to the [DNC charter impartiality clause](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2989759-Impartiality-Clause-DNC-Charter-Bylaws-Art-5-Sec-4.html) but a court ruled the DNC did not (legally) have to abide by its own rules.

So unethical but legal. I’d still call that illegitimate since it ran counter to the rules they set for themselves. The rules Sanders presumed were operative for his run. YMMV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/93 "2018-08-29T23:52:16Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> All you gave is polls. And opinions, in fact showing that Tony Fabrizio says Sanders would have won is proof that Trump would have loved Sanders as a opponent.

That is evidence and it all points in one direction. As good as can be had since we cannot access a parallel universe.

And you gave us what? Your personal opinion and that trumps all the other stuff above?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/94 "2018-08-29T23:52:32Z")

</div>

Sanders has been effective at making left wing ideas more mainstream, and he has succeeded in pushing the Democratic party to the left. It remains to be seen, however, if the Bernie wing of the party can win elections and govern once they do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/95 "2018-08-30T00:07:54Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> I do not know what they asked in the poll but probably not that. So? Do you think Trump’s pollster didn’t know the guy he was working for when he gave his opinion? Do you think Sanders, in a 35 year political career, hasn’t had the “communist” moniker leveled at him? Or do you think Dr Deth and Trump would have been the first ones and no one in all the links given above (and I have more if you want) had not considered that Trump might try to smear his opponent?

That’s some serious disconnect with the conversation. Paraphrased:

You: I gave all this poll data and Trump’s poll guy’s opinion and you think they didn’t consider Sanders would be called a Communist?  
Me: Which of those polls brought up his Communism?  
You: No idea! What difference does that make?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/96 "2018-08-30T00:32:50Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> That’s some serious disconnect with the conversation. Paraphrased:
> 
> You: I gave all this poll data and Trump’s poll guy’s opinion and you think they didn’t consider Sanders would be called a Communist?  
> Me: Which of those polls brought up his Communism?  
> You: No idea! What difference does that make?

It would be a disconnect if you could say with any certitude what effect calling Sanders a “communist” would have. But you don’t. You and **Dr Deth** are assuming it is a trump card that would sink Sanders outright but there is very little reason to believe that is what would happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/97 "2018-08-30T00:49:11Z")

</div>

No, it’s a disconnect because you were implying, to the level of asserting, that your data and opinions took a Commie smear campaign into consideration when you had no idea if that was the case. Then you chnged your mind and said “who knows, who cares?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/98 "2018-08-30T00:50:57Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> No, it’s a disconnect because you were implying, to the level of asserting, that your data and opinions took a Commie smear campaign into consideration.

No, because I do not think asserting a commie smear campaign in any way trumps the polls. You need to show that such a smear campaign makes those polls meaningless. You haven’t done that. It is only your assertion that it does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/99 "2018-08-30T01:15:21Z")

</div>

Bernistas enjoy living in a parallel universe.

How else do you explain the fact that Hillary Clinton won nearly 3 million votes and 11 more contests, and yet claim that Bernie would have been a better candidate than the woman who defeated her?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2018, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264/100 "2018-08-30T01:16:28Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> No, because I do not think asserting a commie smear campaign in any way trumps the polls. You need to show that such a smear campaign makes those polls meaningless. You haven’t done that. It is only your assertion that it does.

Then you should have frigging said that instead of "but apparently you think they did not consider that Trump would have called him a communist? " since you apparently don’t really think that. Thanks for wasting my time.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/democrats-strip-superdelegates-of-power-in-historic-reform-vote/820264.md?page=6)
