# "Demolition Man", did \*anyone\* find the "Kinder, Gentler" society of San Angeles appealing?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [November 30, 2010, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373 "2010-11-30T04:27:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alphaboi867](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alphaboi867/32/3898_2.png) [@alphaboi867](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alphaboi867)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2010, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373/41 "2010-12-02T23:50:07Z")

</div>

> [@Capitaine\_Zombie](#):
>
> She’s not, it’s videophone sex, but with clothes on.

But she _didn’t_ have any clothes on; she fumbled with a towel as she was apologizing for calling the wrong number. And if it’s _video_phone sex why _wouldn’t_ the particpants undress? 😕 They (or at least the male) would be masturbating anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capitaine\_Zombie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e95f7d/32.png) [@Capitaine\_Zombie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capitaine_Zombie)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2010, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373/42 "2010-12-02T23:53:09Z")

</div>

> [@alphaboi867](#):
>
> But she _didn’t_ have any clothes on; she fumbled with a towel as she was apologizing for calling the wrong number. And if it’s _video_phone sex why _wouldn’t_ the particpants undress? 😕 They (or at least the male) would be masturbating anyway.

No, it’s videosex, with clothes on and no masturbation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snarky\_Kong](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a183cd/32.png) [@Snarky\_Kong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snarky_Kong)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2010, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373/43 "2010-12-03T17:05:21Z")

</div>

> [@alphaboi867](#):
>
> But she _didn’t_ have any clothes on; she fumbled with a towel as she was apologizing for calling the wrong number. And if it’s _video_phone sex why _wouldn’t_ the particpants undress? 😕 They (or at least the male) would be masturbating anyway.

Do you think they masturbate? I don’t.

They wouldn’t undress because that’s not how they have sex. They have sex clothed and with a headset on. She had no reason to call while naked. The meta reason of getting boobs into the movie is fine, but there’s no reason within the universe.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/demolition-man-did-anyone-find-the-kinder-gentler-society-of-san-angeles-appealing/562373.md?page=2)