Much simpler to just create a Thread Games subforum under the game room and be done with it. (Or a standalone Thread Games forum. Either way.) This would be a perfect solution, and much easier to maintain than thread prefixes.
Unfortunately Jerry works 24/7, 365 and simply cannot spend a half hour making a new (sub)forum. Nobody else has admin privileges, so we’re SOL for pretty much ever.
We’re convinced subforums don’t build traffic – they destroy it. People don’t see them, skip over them, don’t know about them. We need more traffic, not less.
It’s an experiment, but we think that with some marking of thread titles people will be able to run Google searches to help find the content they’re looking for. Once that content is found people can subscribe to threads as well. Granted, the solution we’re looking at is low-tech but it’s a solution we can implement directly.
If it is used in the opening post then it appears next to the thread when viewing the board it is on.
They are hideous because most forums use hideous icons. A 12x12 dot or square in muted colors wouldn’t be distracting, serve the same purpose as the text labels and would be quicker to scan.
Using all caps in bracket labels in every post is what’s hideous. It’s the text equivalent of a rainbow barfing unicorn or animated gif of Gallagher smashing a watermelon.
I don’t think there is a less disruptive way to accomplish what they want then using post icons like I described, except for doing nothing. Which would be fine too.
If you’re looking at the traffic in SD Chicago, The Barn House and the Marketplace, then I would question whether what you’re seeing is subfourms destroying traffic, or subforums accurately reporting how much the userbase cares about the topic of the forum. I would bet money that there’s far more rehabbing conversations on the dope now than there were before the forum was added.
A full-fledged forum devoted to thread games – as opposed to a subforum – would be equally effective, as noted in my parenthetical. (In fairness, I may have edited that parenthetical in later, though.)
I kinda wish that the experiment had been able to run for a little while, say one week. Give most people a chance to see and express an opinion and see if the thread games sort themselves out in a way that was less intimidating than when they were all right up top after the labeling.
Also, I’m not convinced that the thread games either drive traffic to the rest of the threads in the Game Room or that it’s really desirable traffic. On a board where there’s been worries about database size, responsiveness, and overall stability it seems like the thread games would be undesirable.
I just wanted to extend a kudos to Dex for trying something that might help. From my reading of ATMB, it seems like Dex tries hard to make this board a better place. I appreciate that.
I’ll third that. I was one of I think two people who voted that they liked it in the poll thread that’s disappeared. I’ll agree it was ugly (or maybe [UGLY] ;)), but it made scanning the forum to find non-game threads much easier.
Yeah and they went and mischaracterized the Crusader Kings II thread as “GAME”. While I’m sure all the talk of killing your kids to ensure your favored son inherits the realm sounds like a run-of-the-mill thread game, it’s a legitimate discussion about a complicated video game.