I’m not sure this has specific relevance to anything said yet in this thread. I thought so, but on looking it over, I’m not sure what I thought I saw. But it may yet relate to something to be said, and I’d really hate to have wasted my time. So let me present Lord Buckley(1955) vs.MAD (I am guessing Frank Jacobs, but it appeared uncredited. 1958, it appears).
Also, that Beatles rhyme begins “Ringo, Paul, George and John” as it sacrilegiously spoofs “Matthew, Mark, Luke and John”. As for the Judaism of MAD, the editors saw fit to print, without reply, a complaint by the Imperial Wizard and a(?) Grand Dragon of the KKK, about a mildly insulting Klan reference in their “Animal House” parody, that described them as “the Jew/Communist MAD”.
Interestingly, I saw a current issue of Mad in my attorney’s waiting room just two days ago. It looked out of place in the tastefully decorated, dark wood paneled room, among sober news magazines. I hadn’t read Mad in many years and only had time to page quickly through this issue. I liked the premium paper stock and the color artwork looked good. If the satire matched the artwork, I’d say they’ve kept up their standards.
I was tempted to slip the magazine in my briefcase, but that’s something I would have done as a juvenile Mad reader. I’ve matured…a little.
I’m also tempted to subscribe to Mad and keep it in my waiting room. If I do, I’ll take a photo and send it to you, Wendell.
Yep, Mad stands guilty on that one. Lord Buckley recited the first few lines of his version on You Bet Your Life in 1956, so it had wide exposure even if none of the Mad writers had ever seen his nightclub routine.
Especially the ending: “In order to get the guy you want, you have to become a slut! What a message for the youth of America!”
I found National Lampoon to be EXTREMELY uneven compared to MAD. NL could have several pages of brilliant satire next to several more pages of absolute horse manure. Michael O’Donaghue and Doug Kenney and the rest may have been brilliant, but they needed a shit detector in the worst way. MAD, on the other hand, delivered consistently almost every issue.
Slight hijack: Cracked, at least its web edition, seems to have evolved from a low-rent MAD to a low-rent SPY.