# Did People Know the World Was Round at the Time of Columbus?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 19, 2016, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585 "2016-02-19T22:11:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/21 "2016-02-20T04:05:29Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> In 1585 Columbus submitted his proposed plan to King John II of Portugal for financing. John asked the opinion of his experts, who specifically rejected it because they believed Columbus’s estimates of the distance were far too short. He tried again in 1588 and was rejected because by that time the Portuguese had rounded the Cape of Good Hope and saw their way clear to India by that route.
> 
> Columbus also sought support from Venice and Genoa, and his brother Bartholomew went to England, all without success.
> 
> Columbus proposed his plan to Ferdinand and Isabella in 1586, but it was rejected after being reviewed by experts on the grounds that the distance was too short.

Obviously, all those dates should be in the 1400s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/22 "2016-02-20T04:13:40Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I’ve seen it proposed that it wasn’t coincidence that Columbus found land right where he expected it. On earlier voyages, he traveled north to Scandinavia,

He did? Is this documented anywhere?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/23 "2016-02-20T04:18:00Z")

</div>

> [@Derleth](#):
>
> [If you want to see how deep the ignorance goes, some people think Columbus’ voyage proved the world is round.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=13384999&postcount=35)

That what I was taught in the lower grades, circa late 1950s - early 1960s, up through 3rd grade, right along with George Washington and the cherry tree and such tales. My 4th grade teacher explained to us that this was wrong, and that all _educated_ people in the days of Columbus knew that the earth was round.

I’m pretty sure that it was then also, in 4th grade, that the teacher explained how people could live all over the earth without the people and the oceans on the underside all falling off.

Maybe the idea was that children in then-modern Western education get sophisticated enough by about 4th grade to learn and understand such mysteries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/24 "2016-02-20T04:23:02Z")

</div>

Dante wrote Divine Comedy in the early 1300’s, in which he pretty clearly lays out a spherical earthly geography, with Mount Purgatory on the opposite side of the globe from Jerusalem. And a comfortable heated shortcut through the center of the Earth to get from here to there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimpy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c68b51/32.png) [@Jimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimpy)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/25 "2016-02-20T04:25:43Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> From Wikipedia’s article [Spherical Earth](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth)
> 
> Eratosthenes, a Greek astronomer from Hellenistic Libya (276–194 BC), estimated Earth’s circumference around 240 BC. He had heard that in Syene the Sun was directly overhead at the summer solstice whereas in Alexandria it still cast a shadow. Using the differing angles the shadows made as the basis of his trigonometric calculations he estimated a circumference of around 250,000 stades. The length of a ‘stade’ is not precisely known, but Eratosthenes’s figure only has an error of around five to fifteen percent. Eratosthenes used rough estimates and round numbers, but depending on the length of the stadion, his result is within a margin of between 2% and 20% of the actual meridional circumference, 40,008 kilometres (24,860 mi). Note that Eratosthenes could only measure the circumference of the Earth by assuming that the distance to the Sun is so great that the rays of sunlight are essentially parallel. :

The problem with the whole Eratosthenes thing is, he didn’t really prove ANYTHING. He assumed the Earth was spherical and was far enough away not to cause parallax. If the Earth is flat, and the sun is close enough you can still have the sun directly overhead in Syene and casting a shadow in Alexandria. Every argument I’ve ever seen that the ancients supposedly used to prove the Earth is a sphere can appear if the Earth is flat. However, the star or the ships at sea or the curveature of the shadow on the moon during an eclipse would act slightly differently if the Earth is a sphere or flat and these differences could be measured.

In the time of Columbus scientist were still mostly still in the believe everything the ancients said mode. And they said the Earth was a sphere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/26 "2016-02-20T04:27:30Z")

</div>

So why was it still being written, at such later dates, that the curvature of the earth can be seen in its shadow on the moon, and the appearance of ships as they sail past the horizon? – I see several posts above bringing up that question. (ETA: In particular, OP’s paragraph #3.)

Well, even in my own relatively recent youth (relatively recent compared to the days of Columbus, that is), we were still being taught that.

The reasonably clear answer, of course, is to point out to all us impressionable young kiddos that this is something that _you can go out and see for your very own self, with your very own eyeballs!_ In other words, indoctrinating us all in the basic tenet of the Scientific Method!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/27 "2016-02-20T04:30:23Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> He did? Is this documented anywhere?

In 1477 he visited England and Ireland, and may possibly have also visited Iceland at this time. The source is a biography of Columbus written by his son Ferdinand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimpy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c68b51/32.png) [@Jimpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimpy)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/28 "2016-02-20T04:53:17Z")

</div>

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> So why was it still being written, at such later dates, that the curvature of the earth can be seen in its shadow on the moon, and the appearance of ships as they sail past the horizon? – I see several posts above bringing up that question. (ETA: In particular, OP’s paragraph #3.)
> 
> Well, even in my own relatively recent youth (relatively recent compared to the days of Columbus, that is), we were still being taught that.
> 
> The reasonably clear answer, of course, is to point out to all us impressionable young kiddos that this is something that _you can go out and see for your very own self, with your very own eyeballs!_ In other words, indoctrinating us all in the basic tenet of the Scientific Method!

If the Earth is flat and circular, and all the land is in the center surrounded by the ocean, then the shadow of the earth on the moon will be circular everywhere except the edges out in the ocean if the moon is far enough away east or west. However the amount of curvature would change depending on where the moon is and that change could be noticed and measured.

Foreshortening can explain ships dissapearing if they get far enough away. The ship gets smaller ans if travels outwards and closer waves would start to cover it from the bottom first. Even a calm sea has swells. It might be a bit more difficult but even this could be tested.

The stars change when traveling north or south and on a flat earth, if the stars were close enough, this would happen too. There would be a profound difference as you went farther north or south and that could be measured.

The ancients, especially the Pythagoreans were system builders. They though the sphere was the perfect shape and designed the earth to be a sphere for that reason. Their proofs were really testable hypothesises.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/29 "2016-02-20T05:44:49Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> In 1477 he visited England and Ireland, and may possibly have also visited Iceland at this time. The source is a biography of Columbus written by his son Ferdinand.

Yes, I’m aware of England and Ireland. How much evidence is there that he actually went to Iceland (or any other Scandinavian country)?

I mean if we say he possibly went to Iceland where he possibly heard about… then that’s unwarranted speculation. Especially since what he “possibly heard about” happened centuries before he “possibly” went there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/30 "2016-02-20T05:52:36Z")

</div>

> [@Derleth](#):
>
> [If you want to see how deep the ignorance goes, some people think Columbus’ voyage proved the world is round.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=13384999&postcount=35)
> 
> Not Magellan, Columbus.
> 
> I _know_.
> 
> (Asking me questions isn’t going to clarify anything for either of us. I’m not the one who’s confused here, and I don’t know any more about this misbegotten idea than you do.)

Pffft. Magellen. The first person to prove the Earth was round was Yuri Gagarin.

Poor Elcano gets shafted in these discussions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 6:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/31 "2016-02-20T06:10:15Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Yes, I’m aware of England and Ireland. How much evidence is there that he actually went to Iceland (or any other Scandinavian country)?
> 
> I mean if we say he possibly went to Iceland where he possibly heard about… then that’s unwarranted speculation. Especially since what he “possibly heard about” happened centuries before he “possibly” went there.

There’s also the fact that Columbus sailed south from Spain down to the Canary Islands before crossing the Atlantic and arriving in the Caribbean. This isn’t the route he would have chosen if he was consciously following in the path of Leif Erikson.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a9a28c/32.png) [@Blake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blake)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/32 "2016-02-20T06:21:47Z")

</div>

> [@Jimpy](#):
>
> If the Earth is flat and circular, and all the land is in the center surrounded by the ocean, then the shadow of the earth on the moon will be circular everywhere except the edges out in the ocean if the moon is far enough away east or west. However the amount of curvature would change depending on where the moon is and that change could be noticed and measured.

That’s only true if you accept “distinctly elliptical” as “circular”.

Once you add together a few easily observable facts: the moon rises at different times on different parts of the planet, eclipses are only total on some parts of the planet and eclipses are always perfectly circular, you are left with a spherical planet.

If the Earth were flat, then the same eclipse would have to be visible everywhere on Earth at the same time since, as you point out, to have even a vaguely circular eclipse, the moon would have to be “far enough away” that the light would be striking the whole moon at near enough the same angle.

If the moon were close enough that a mountain range could make a meaningful difference in the time of moonrise, much less the 12+ hour difference that we actually see, then the shadow of the Earth would be acutely elliptical.

The fact that the sun/moon rise at vastly different times depending on longitude is by itself almost proof that the Earth is round. It can be explained by invoking a rotating disc, a close moon and high mountains. But if the mountains were high enough to generate that effect with a distant sun/moon, then they would be clearly visible to the naked eye. And if the moon is close them ,as you note, the shadow won’t be circular.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/cc9497/32.png) [@Isilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isilder)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 7:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/33 "2016-02-20T07:18:27Z")

</div>

> [@Blake](#):
>
> That’s only true if you accept “distinctly elliptical” as “circular”.
> 
> Once you add together a few easily observable facts: the moon rises at different times on different parts of the planet, eclipses are only total on some parts of the planet and eclipses are always perfectly circular, you are left with a spherical planet.
> 
> If the Earth were flat, then the same eclipse would have to be visible everywhere on Earth at the same time since, as you point out, to have even a vaguely circular eclipse, the moon would have to be “far enough away” that the light would be striking the whole moon at near enough the same angle.
> 
> If the moon were close enough that a mountain range could make a meaningful difference in the time of moonrise, much less the 12+ hour difference that we actually see, then the shadow of the Earth would be acutely elliptical.
> 
> The fact that the sun/moon rise at vastly different times depending on longitude is by itself almost proof that the Earth is round. It can be explained by invoking a rotating disc, a close moon and high mountains. But if the mountains were high enough to generate that effect with a distant sun/moon, then they would be clearly visible to the naked eye. And if the moon is close them ,as you note, the shadow won’t be circular.

Blake, no… all those small things weren’t falsely explained or even known about, at the time of Socrates. They might have predicted your info from their info, but they couldn’t confirm it, not without highly accurate chronographs. They could see data which hinted at the correctness, but they knew the difficulties in being very very sure… There were alternative explanations, possible errors that get in the way … The air might cause lensing. They could see hot air lensing, so the cold air on the ocean might be lensing too. And then the time differences… more lensing ?

Herodotus wrote that many people favoured a spherical earth model before , especially since the Phoenecians travelled down to the south of Africa, and observed the sun well to the North … That ruined flat earth for many…  
Its Socrates who uses the shape and curvature of the earth’s shadow on the moon at the lunar eclipse… And the prediction of the eclipses, and all that to show that the the earth is this large, spherical, and the sun is a long long way away.  
Perhaps the hold up from Herodotus to Socrates, although it wasn’t so long a time , was only the blood moon… shouldn’t the moon just go black ? Without an explanation for that, they didn’t accept the lunar eclipse data in its entirety… Socrates convinced them to accept the spherical earth. The curve of the earth on the moon … it matched up to the data from the measurement of the sun vs the change in latitude… It was proof, because the mathematical model was proved by precise correlation with the observation. I think socrates explained blood moon (as being normal for light going through the atmosphere, because the sunrise and sunset is also red… and could replicate it in minitature… ) and give good idea as to the scale of lensing from the atmosphere and so on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 9:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/34 "2016-02-20T09:15:59Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> In 1585 Columbus submitted his proposed plan to King John II of Portugal for financing. John asked the opinion of his experts, who specifically rejected it because they believed Columbus’s estimates of the distance were far too short. He tried again in 1588 and was rejected because by that time the Portuguese had rounded the Cape of Good Hope and saw their way clear to India by that route.
> 
> Columbus also sought support from Venice and Genoa, and his brother Bartholomew went to England, all without success.
> 
> Columbus proposed his plan to Ferdinand and Isabella in 1586, but it was rejected after being reviewed by experts on the grounds that the distance was too short.
> 
> However, he continued to lobby the Spanish monarchs. Ferdinand finally gave in in 1492 after the expulsion of the Moors freed up some funds. (Isabella continued to be mostly against it.) I think they figured it was a long shot but this madman might discover _something_ out there.

Apparently, there was some calendar reform going on around then, as well…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/35 "2016-02-20T16:03:49Z")

</div>

“Freed up some funds” is vaguely disgusting for the source of this wealth. Perhaps it was said cynically; but plunder on such a scale is not an everyday occurrence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/36 "2016-02-20T16:34:32Z")

</div>

> [@Jimpy](#):
>
> The problem with the whole Eratosthenes thing is, he didn’t really prove ANYTHING. He assumed the Earth was spherical and was far enough away not to cause parallax. If the Earth is flat, and the sun is close enough you can still have the sun directly overhead in Syene and casting a shadow in Alexandria. Every argument I’ve ever seen that the ancients supposedly used to prove the Earth is a sphere can appear if the Earth is flat. However, the star or the ships at sea or the curveature of the shadow on the moon during an eclipse would act slightly differently if the Earth is a sphere or flat and these differences could be measured.
> 
> In the time of Columbus scientist were still mostly still in the believe everything the ancients said mode. And they said the Earth was a sphere.

No, Eratosthenes knew the earth was a sphere from the other evidence. He wanted to measure the size of the sphere. As claimed we do not know the actual length of the stadion so we can only guess how close he came. Another source of error was measuring the distance between Alexandria and Syene (modern day Aswan). The method they apparently used was to measure the circumference of a chariot wheel and count the number of revolutions required to go on a straight path from Alexandria to Syene. It is clear that this method is fraught with potential error. Nonetheless he got it pretty well right.

Eratosthenes is better know for having sifted out primes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/37 "2016-02-20T16:53:30Z")

</div>

The info on Columbus visiting Iceland (called “Ultima Thule” by some) are varied. The 9th/10th Encyclopedia Britannica says [he did](http://www.1902encyclopedia.com/C/COL/christopher-columbus.html).

I’ve generally read that he _bragged_ to have visited Iceland but with a good amount of skepticism about it.

It would have been practically impossible for him not to have heard tales of land reachable west of the British Isles.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2016, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/38 "2016-02-20T17:32:44Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> The info on Columbus visiting Iceland (called “Ultima Thule” by some) are varied. The 9th/10th Encyclopedia Britannica says [he did](http://www.1902encyclopedia.com/C/COL/christopher-columbus.html).

A source from 1902? I’d like to see something more contemporary before I accept that.

> [@](#):
>
> I’ve generally read that he _bragged_ to have visited Iceland but with a good amount of skepticism about it.
> 
> It would have been practically impossible for him not to have heard tales of land reachable west of the British Isles.

But then, why wouldn’t it have been “practically impossible” for every learned man to have heard of those tales, making CC not such an exception? Or are you just talking about Iceland, not Vinland?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2016, 6:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/39 "2016-02-22T06:48:49Z")

</div>

There’s also the theory that Basque fishermen were visiting the grand Banks before Columbus’ voyages, and he knew this…

Way more than you ever want to know… [http://www.metrum.org/measures/measurements.htm](http://www.metrum.org/measures/measurements.htm)

From what I read - there were two schools of thought - [The Round Earth and Christopher Columbus](http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Scolumb.htm)

> [@](#):
>
> The idea of sailing westward to India dates back to the early Romans. According to Dr. Irene Fischer, who studied this subject, the Roman writer Strabo, not long after Erathosthenes and Posidonius, reported their results and noted:
> 
> "if of the more recent measurements of the Earth, the one which makes the Earth smallest in circumference be introduced–I mean that of Posidonius who estimates its circumference at about 180,000 stadia, then. . . "
> 
> and he continues:
> 
> "Posidonius suspects that the length of the inhabited world, about 70,000 stadia, is half the entire circle on which it had been taken, so that if you sail from the west in a straight course, you will reach India within 70,000 stadia. "
> 
> ```
> Notice that Strabo--for unclear reasons--reduced the 250,000 Stadia of Eratosthenes to 180,000, and then stated that half of that distance came to just 70,000 stadia. Handling his numbers in that loose fashion, he could argue that India was not far to the west. 
> 
> ```

Columbus erroneously picks the wrong smaller size diameter for the earth; he takes Marco Polo’s writings and estimates how far east to China; then uses a most convenient definition of “stadia” to estimate that China lies only 3000 miles west from Iberia. Most educated people knew of Erathosthenese calculations and pointed out that the expedition could not sail the necessary 15,000 miles or more to reach China. Spain decided to take a wild chance on Columbus, since Portugal’s command of the circum-Africa route was freezing them out of the opening spice trade.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freddy\_the\_Pig](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@Freddy\_the\_Pig](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freddy_the_Pig)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2016, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585/40 "2016-02-23T17:22:29Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Yes, I’m aware of England and Ireland. How much evidence is there that he actually went to Iceland (or any other Scandinavian country)?

We’ll never know whether Columbus really visited Iceland. All we know is that his son said he did, and that he story is not implausible, since there was a steady trade between the British Isles and Iceland at the time.

However, I _personally_ am extremely skeptical that he learned anything relevant to his American voyages while there. Columbus didn’t speak Norse and is unlikely to have attended saga recitals with a translator. _At best_ he may have picked up stories of voyages to Greenland, which had ceased less than a century before, but these would have been little different from the legends and tall tales that sailors told of a thousand imaginary lands.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-people-know-the-world-was-round-at-the-time-of-columbus/746585.md?page=3)
