They are astronaughts, they are pretty smart. They have enough crap onboard I am sure one could juryrig somethign together. a simple taser or flamethrower maybe. oxygen tanks + tube + spark = friendly fire but still a weapon
I’m never surprised when a news story from the time turns out to be fiction. Do you know if this was a NASA supplied story, or something one of the talking heads made up or misunderstood?
If you have a supply of pure oxygen, particularly liquid or pressurized oxygen, most things will burn, often quite violently. The metals, the plastics, the clothing, even the food.
You could probably make a kick ass flame thrower with some tubing, jars/bottles, pressurized oxygen, and TANG (seriously).
Witness the failure of the liquid oxygen tank aboard Apollo 13. The heater wiring was insulated with Teflon. It burned. No matter how you cut it, that is impressive. I have seen LOX fires burn through sheet metal without even noticing. (Also worth noting how an oxycutter works. Once cutting, the fuel for the cutter is the steel.)
I’m afraid the sign in that museum exhibit was the one and only place I’ve seen a reference to the potential human immunosuppresive effects of titanate lunar soils (a great title for a scientific paper, but a lousy band name). Someone with access to NASA papers from the time will have to troll through the archives to find out how much of the quarantine was to monitor the astronauts’ immune response, and how much was to prevent the spread of “moon germs” :rolleyes:
My guess is the moon germs stories were a giant misunderstanding, spread from one reporter to another. It would be very hard to counter this simple explanation with the subtler, but more correct one.
A similar story: Everyone knows that retuning space capsules heat up because of friction with the atmosphere, right? Wrong - according to one of my physics professors. Friction accounts for less than half of the heating. Most of the heating is caused by the capsule compressing the air underneath it as it enters the earth’s atmosphere at super sonic speeds. The capsule would have to create a big shock wave as it entered the atmosphere, and all that heat and pressure have to go somewhere.
I think there, the problem isn’t one of understanding the physical processes involved, but just of the definition of “friction”. When you say that the heating isn’t due to friction, you’re presumably considering friction to be a purely shear force. But one could also refer to any dissipative force which opposes motion to be “friction”, in which case the ram-pressure heating can fairly be described as frictional. You have to be careful here, lest, in correcting a relatively small misconception, you replace it with a much bigger misconception.
Does anyone else think that epl442’s post was meant to be a joke?
I mean, it’s on par with an article I wrote in high school for our ‘underground’ newspaper where I claimed our cylindrical gym was actually a missile silo and the Guidance Center was actually a guidance center! The post that resurrected this thread is just too outrageous to be serious.