# Did The Romans Speak Latin With An Accent?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 11, 2005, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664 "2005-10-11T00:15:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deevee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/57b2e6/32.png) [@deevee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/deevee)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/1 "2005-10-11T00:15:35Z")

</div>

I cannot speak Latin however anytime I do hear it spoken it is in a monotone drone. Surely the language must have been more voluable and inflective when spoken but do we have any idea of just how it sounded? Do any writings that survive phonetically spell the language ala Robert Burns? Would a Roman be able to understand and converse with a fluent Latin linguist from today?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/2 "2005-10-11T01:06:11Z")

</div>

Well, some have made good guesses. The Latin you have heard is “church Latin” and Classical Roman Latin was certainly NOT spoken like that.

Doubtless there were many dialects, some right there in The City.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/3 "2005-10-11T04:43:46Z")

</div>

The use of Latin was spread out over a large empire with few efforts to ensure linguistic conformity among the diverse population. Thus, accents and dialects were inevitably going to develop. That’s also how the Romance languages of Spanish, Portuguese, French, Romanian, and Italian evolved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLoadedDog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/35a633/32.png) [@TheLoadedDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheLoadedDog)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 4:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/4 "2005-10-11T04:51:17Z")

</div>

Welease Bwian!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kizarvexius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/da6949/32.png) [@Kizarvexius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kizarvexius)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/5 "2005-10-11T14:43:20Z")

</div>

Just as today the accents of spoken Latin had much to do with one’s economic class/station of life. Horace (IIRC) wrote a satire about a working class plebian who come into a great deal of money and, naturally, decided to act the part of the wealthier man. Part of this behavior modification included speaking with a more upper-class accent. What this points to is the fact that speakers of working-class Latin, like Cockneys, tended to drop their word-initial letters ‘H’. Because this fellow, in an effort to sound wealthier, kept adding an H to the beginning of words that didn’t require them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/6 "2005-10-11T14:46:04Z")

</div>

I’m sure that different geographical regions had different pronunciations, especially as time went by. One cute touch in the Heinlein novel “Have Sopacesuit – Will Travel” is the Roman soldier picked up via time machine from Spain – he’s from a time when they started turning the “-us” endings into “-o” endings on nouns, with that region’s Latin starting to morph into Spanish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sjc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e5b9ba/32.png) [@sjc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sjc)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/7 "2005-10-11T21:15:58Z")

</div>

> [@deevee](#):
>
> I cannot speak Latin however anytime I do hear it spoken it is in a monotone drone. Surely the language must have been more voluable and inflective when spoken but do we have any idea of just how it sounded? Do any writings that survive phonetically spell the language ala Robert Burns? Would a Roman be able to understand and converse with a fluent Latin linguist from today?

As other people have noted, there were many many dialects of Latin across space and time, so obviously some of them would not be spoken in a monotone drone. Indeed, it is unlikely that _any_ of the dialects would be spoken in a monotone by native speakers. Tone and syllable stress can carry a lot of extra information, it would be strange if a language didn’t make use of them in everyday speech.

As to whether a Roman would be able to understand and converse with a fluent Latin linguist of today, I don’t know. I would guess that a person who knew their Latin very well would be able to make themselves understood by Roman (provided they were both using the same variety), but that it might be a very stilted conversation. The modern person might have to fumble around a bit while she figured out the nuances of pronunciation and the Ancient Roman might have to speak slowly to be understood.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sjc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e5b9ba/32.png) [@sjc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sjc)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 9:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/8 "2005-10-11T21:27:28Z")

</div>

I should also add that _everyone_ speaks with an accent, no matter what language you are speaking.

I suppose some might speak of, for example, “Standard English” and say that this is accentless. I don’t agree. In the first place, speech varies too much on a moment to moment basis to realistically enforce an unchanging standard, in the second place there may be competing “standards” as with British English and American English.

This also applies to other languages.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deevee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/57b2e6/32.png) [@deevee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/deevee)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/9 "2005-10-11T21:33:09Z")

</div>

> [@sjc](#):
>
> I should also add that _everyone_ speaks with an accent, no matter what language you are speaking.
> 
> .

I knew somebody would call me on that. 😃

Thanks for the responses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lizardling](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f4b2a3/32.png) [@lizardling](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lizardling)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/10 "2005-10-11T21:33:43Z")

</div>

Vulgar/Vulgate Latin. Article on Wikipedia [here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgar_Latin).

This was the variety of Latin that eventually gave rise to the Romance Languages, according to Wikipedia, which jibes with my recollection that this was the working man’s version of Latin. As opposed to the highflown stuff called Classical. 🙂

Besides, there’s the point that your average Roman jarhead (helmethead?) would likely have a metric buttload of slang that a modern linguist would have a) spasms of joy over and b) a headache trying to figure it out at conversational speed. I agree that it’d be a very stilted conversation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bytegeist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9dc877/32.png) [@Bytegeist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bytegeist)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/11 "2005-10-11T21:55:12Z")

</div>

> [@deevee](#):
>
> Surely [Latin] must have been more voluable and inflective when spoken but do we have any idea of just how it sounded?

Of course. Rent _Spartacus_ sometime and listen carefully to Tony Curtis’s speech. It’s a good example of Latin as it was spoken in northern New Jersey, east of the Turnpike.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/12 "2005-10-11T23:16:50Z")

</div>

One thing I liked about the BBC “I, Claudius” was how they used accents. All the patricians had recieved english accents, but the soldiers and servants all had working-class London accents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleRojelio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/unclerojelio/32/3160_2.png) [@UncleRojelio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleRojelio)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/13 "2005-10-11T23:22:55Z")

</div>

> [@Bytegeist](#):
>
> Of course. Rent _Spartacus_ sometime and listen carefully to Tony Curtis’s speech. It’s a good example of Latin as it was spoken in northern New Jersey, east of the Turnpike.

Which exit?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![deevee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/57b2e6/32.png) [@deevee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/deevee)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2005, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/14 "2005-10-11T23:42:41Z")

</div>

The Bronx. It’s pronounced Spa-teh-cus. And it’s kinda gay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kizarvexius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/da6949/32.png) [@Kizarvexius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kizarvexius)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 1:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/15 "2005-10-12T13:51:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bytegeist](#):
>
> Of course. Rent _Spartacus_ sometime and listen carefully to Tony Curtis’s speech. It’s a good example of Latin as it was spoken in northern New Jersey, east of the Turnpike.

That one made my morning. 🕶

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rowrrbazzle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rowrrbazzle/32/414_2.png) [@rowrrbazzle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rowrrbazzle)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/16 "2005-10-12T19:07:14Z")

</div>

Here’s a recent Metafilter post with links to readings of Latin and Greek. [http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/45552](http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/45552)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saoirse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5daacb/32.png) [@saoirse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/saoirse)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/17 "2005-10-12T19:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@NDP](#):
>
> The use of Latin was spread out over a large empire with few efforts to ensure linguistic conformity among the diverse population. Thus, accents and dialects were inevitably going to develop. That’s also how the Romance languages of Spanish, Portuguese, French, Romanian, and Italian evolved.

I have always wondered at about what point Latin became standardized into the form my parents learned. That is when did “Weni, wedi wiki” get to “Venite Adoremus?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marque\_elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/71c47a/32.png) [@marque\_elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marque_elf)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/18 "2005-10-12T20:49:52Z")

</div>

There was a book written in the 1970s by Richard Ben Sapir called _The Far Arenas_. In it a Roman gladiator from just after the death of Christ is revived in the present. He speaks nothing but working class Latin. A Ph.D in Latin and a nun from Scandinavia with several advanced linguistics degrees and papers to her credit are brought in to talk to the poor schlep. He, of course, finds them almost completely incomprehensible. He is illiterate and their pronunciation of even simple words is totally different from even the upper classes of his time. They do eventually learn to talk to him (or there’d be no book). I don’t remember how the book ended but I do recall that he was horrified by the crucifix the nun is wearing. He can’t understand why a religion devoted to peace would use an instrument of torture as their identifying symbol. He tells her that the fish was the image that the early Christians used as their symbol and she stops wearing the crucifix.

There were also regional differences in the church latin. The latin used by an Irish priest sounded very different than that used by an Italian one. James Reston Jr. wrote a book called \*1000 A.D. the Last Apocalypse \* that dealt with the subject of how Europe became universally Catholic around this time. Several French clerics played prominent roles in this process. They all complained about how barbaric the church latin that was used in the different states was compared to their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CJJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecc23a/32.png) [@CJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CJJ)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/19 "2005-10-12T21:20:04Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Horace (IIRC) wrote a satire about a working class plebian who come into a great deal of money and, naturally, decided to act the part of the wealthier man. Part of this behavior modification included speaking with a more upper-class accent. What this points to is the fact that speakers of working-class Latin, like Cockneys, tended to drop their word-initial letters ‘H’. Because this fellow, in an effort to sound wealthier, kept adding an H to the beginning of words that didn’t require them.

The poem is by Catullus, [Carmina 84 (Chommoda dicebat)](http://www.vroma.org/~hwalker/VRomaCatullus/084.html).

> [@](#):
>
> I have always wondered at about what point Latin became standardized into the form my parents learned. That is when did “Weni, wedi wiki” get to “Venite Adoremus?”

The contrasts between the literary Latin of Cicero and the vulgar Latin of the common man have been noted in this thread, and the Wikipedia article cited summarizes the differences. The Vulgar tended to have a greater influence in Medieval Latin. Latin had become mainly a secondary language for most scholars (and there was no central figure like a Cicero or Vergil to guide uniform usage), writers tended to adopt vocabulary and grammar from their native languages. Spelling changes are particularly obvious, and these indicate how native language pronunciation was usurping the classical pronunciation. By the time of the Renaissance, Erasmus could complain that speakers from different countries were unable to understand each others’ form of Latin.

Erasmus didn’t just complain, however; he wrote a comprehensive Latin grammar based on the classical language, and this was in turn adopted by William Lily in creating his own grammar for English schools. Lily’s canonical pronunciation was Italian, reflecting the style of the leading Latin scholars of the Renaissance. This grammar, by decree of Henry VIII, became the standard grammar used in English schoolrooms (and by extension the English-speaking Americas), and thus institutionalized Latin education (and pronunciation) for generations of students until the 19th century.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kizarvexius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/da6949/32.png) [@Kizarvexius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kizarvexius)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2005, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-the-romans-speak-latin-with-an-accent/325664/20 "2005-10-12T22:05:03Z")

</div>

> [@CJJ\*](#):
>
> The poem is by Catullus, [Carmina 84 (Chommoda dicebat)](http://www.vroma.org/~hwalker/VRomaCatullus/084.html).

Thanks for the identification. One of my Latin profs told me about this years ago, but kept forgetting to look it up for me. Now I know.
