# Did you guys know that Evil Captor likes bondage? With bonus fuck-off for Miller! **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [November 17, 2005, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510 "2005-11-17T17:31:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/41 "2005-11-17T20:53:06Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > His constant habit of bringing it up is, yes, creepy. And unpleasant. And gross. If it was something non-sexual, it’d just be annoying. But the fact that it’s sexual suggests that either he thinks of nothing _but_ bondage sex, or he particularly gets off on inserting bondage \*Gotcha!\*s into irrelevant places. The logical question would be, why not put me on “ignore” if you dislike bondage content in your discussions, and my stuff is so full of it? Why all the pitting? Why all the wailing and gnashing of teeth? ---
**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/42 "2005-11-17T20:54:50Z")
> [@Maureen](#): > > It would certainly decrease the stress on the hamsters. Like, to zero. > > To the OP: I understand your point, but I think it’s just like any other hijack; the content is just a bit, um, different. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. And of _course_ it’s exhibitionistic. We’re on a message board and are encouraged to express our opinions. We’re _all_ exhibitionists to a certain extent. Some more than others is all. Um, are you aware of what the word “exhibitionism” means? > [@askeptic](#): > > Substitute “Fluffy snugle bunny straight vanilla sex” for the word bondage in EC posts and it would be just as annoying. The guy clearly has a fetish. And he clearly likes to share his fetish with us. Just as some of us clearly do not appreciate being unwilling participants in his fetish. I do not care what fetish a person has, it gets annoying though when it is all they seem to talk about. I don’t see what the PC outrage here is all about - why is it apparently so upsetting to so many of you guys that folks like **askeptic** , or **inkleberry** , or me, don’t necessarily want to run into constant references to BDSM? Is that a shocker? Are we really the only people getting creeped out by this? I doubt it. > [@archmichael](#): > > I heard he hangs out at bondage messageboards and makes constant ‘vanilla’ references. Now that’s just sick. 😃 > > People feel we’re already hog-tied with a lot of posting rules. Not allowing bondage references seems like pointless ball-gagging of a free expression. I figure different paddle strokes for different folks. I wasn’t asking an admin to _stop_ him. I was pitting him. The way we do here. I’m not trying to stop him from doing anything. I’m just yelling at him for doing it. 🙂 > [@Cheesesteak](#): > > From a quick sampling of the first five links, nobody in the threads seemed to even notice Evil Captor’s bondage references, except in the L&O thread. In that thread, there didn’t seem to be anyone batting an eye at the bondage reference, except to suggest it as a spinoff show. > > Yeah, he’s really ruining the threads he participates in. > > Some people have a knack of making threads they participate in all about them, and their little fetishes, Evil Captor is not one of them. Well, it’s possible that **inkleberry** and I are the only two people on the SDMB who’ve simply read his countless references to slavegirls, rape scenes, and whipping and gotten a little more creeped out by it every time. Or maybe, you know, no one wanted to look like a jerk by hijacking a thread over what is, of course, a fairly small issue. If **Evil Captor** had only done this a few times, it wouldn’t be at issue. It’s the creepiness of the idea that he does it _constantly_ that makes it seem like something other than his own harmless little habit. ---
**Author:** ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/43 "2005-11-17T20:55:40Z")
So, I found a post by Evil Captor and clicked on his name and clicked on find all posts. The guy has over 7000 posts you know. There are 25 results per page. Now the first two are responses to the two threads about him. The rest of the first page has these bondage posts. (no results) The second page has one reference to bondage. It is to a thread that he has many posts in and only one has the bondage reference. (the movies better with nudity thread) That’s fifty results. The claim that he does this all the time is patently false. Yes you can search 7000 posts and find 10 quickly but that doesn’t mean that is all he posts about. So in other words he seems to have spent the last couple of days _not_ talking about bondage. Can you explain the thought process behind. 1 “I’m offended by the fact that \*\*Evil Captor \*\* posts about that” 2 “He did it again!” 3 I’m going to search out all the other ofensive posts and then read and then pit him for putting all that stuff in the archive for me to fine when I search for Evil+Captor+Bondage. I should be able to search those words without being offended. ---
**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/44 "2005-11-17T20:55:59Z")
Wow, two bad codings in one thread. :: sigh :: I don’t usually do that. Really. ---
**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/45 "2005-11-17T20:58:03Z")
> [@Zebra](#): > > 1 “I’m offended by the fact that \*\*Evil Captor \*\* posts about that” > 2 “He did it again!” > 3 I’m going to search out all the other ofensive posts and then read and then pit him for putting all that stuff in the archive for me to fine when I search for Evil+Captor+Bondage. I should be able to search those words without being offended. Um, because it’s customary to bring cites to a pit thread? Jesus Christ, are you really too stupid to figure that out? ---
**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/46 "2005-11-17T21:02:04Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > Because, **CandidGamera** , I’m not stupid. Hey, hey, let’s not jump to conclusions. 😉 > [@](#): > > And not being stupid means that I have the capacity to examine a situation and draw conclusions based on it. In this case, my conclusion is based on his tendency to drop bondage, whipping, and rape references into completely irrelevant discussions at every opportunity. See, I’ve noticed **Evil Captor** ’s behavior for quite some time now, and it’s simply not credible, in my opinion, that his utterly gratuitous mentions that he likes bondage are not motivated by some gleeful feeling of being naughty, at very least. The threads he started on the subject, linked by **inkleberry** in the other thread, demonstrate that at times he starts threads simply to fish for wank material. EVERY opportunity? Exaggerate much? He interjects these little comments occasionally - that much is certain - but when you speculate as to the motivation, you go off into left field. I’ve been known to make the occasional sly, lewd comment from time to time, directed towards the fine womenfolk hereabouts. I don’t really know how often. However - I don’t do it because I get my jollies thinking about how offended they’ll be that I’ve hit on them - I do it because I’m betting it’ll make them chuckle. And how many vanilla sex-themed threads have been started on the boards? How many of those started by the same small group of people? I won’t point fingers, but there are a few posters that do a lot of the OPs in that category. Are they using it for wank material? Heck if I know. If I think they might be, and it ‘annoys’ me, or disturbs me, I won’t go in. > [@](#): > > Now, my dear **CandidGamera** , you have simply used a clumsy _tu quoque_ here. Something like, “You think he’s lying? Well, I think _you’re_ lying! How do you like that, Mr. Smartypants?” Now, were you not stupid, as I am not, you would instead base your conclusions on observing behavior. I certainly don’t have a long-standing pattern of objecting to discussions of kinky sex. You don’t have a shred of evidence to support your contention that I’m lying and am secretly a prude - nope, the best you can manage is the sort of mindless equivalency that says, “If one person is doing it, we can axiomatically assume that his opponent is doing it to!” That’s bad enough when it comes to political threads and the inevitable mindless idiot piping up to say that both parties are the same and all politicians are evil. But when you’re making personal accusations against me, it moves beyond mere stupidity to become offensive as well. Your objection seems to be : “He talks about this a lot… [whine]and it’s sexual![/whine]” You don’t seem to take issue with nonsexual one-trick ponies, as indicated by your response to my initial query in that regard. If the fact that his subject of choice is sexual changes its nature in your eyes, for the worse - then guess what? You _are_ kind of a prude. Granted, the circumstantial evidence piles up higher for him than it does for you, but it’s all circumstantial. I’m willing to take him at his word, though. > [@](#): > > As a matter of fact, I have sexual interests that many people would find quite disgusting or even frightening. However, I have the social graces and the dignity not to mention them at every possible opportunity, because I believe that ones private interests should be disclosed in a circumspect manner and only where it is relevant. That’s not to say I wouldn’t participate in a discussion of sexual matters, just that I have the common courtesy not to drag my own pecadillos into every thread I see. And some people are less close-minded and want to occasionally (and it is only occasionally) discuss such things. > [@](#): > > Because, as I have already explained, the surprise mentions of it are basically the equivalent of a guy groping women on the subway. Getting a big handful of boob with the right person at the right time and place is a completely different matter than doing it to a stranger in public. Look at the threads \*_inkleberry_ linked, and the posts I linked above. It’s obvious that he gets a gleeful little kick out of bringing his fetish up. Hey, that’s a natural impulse. It’s fun talking about what turns you on. But, as I said, there’s a time and a place for everything. That’s not a solid analogy, and ignoring that for the moment, one can’t prevent someone from taking sexual pleasure from a conversation except by avoiding the conversation. There’s that big old ignore feature… > [@](#): > > (snipped misdirected rant) > Good job, you guys. Good job to everyone who piped up with veiled (or not-so-veiled) charges of bigotry. Great way to not only weaken a word that describes a very real phenomenon in the real world by mindlessly tossing it out whenever anyone disagrees with you. In case none of you people are aware, real discrimination against the BDSM crowd happens. Have you guys forgotten that the DSM-IV still categorizes it as a “mental illness”? Have you forgotten the widespread persecution of people trying to run businesses serving the BDSM community? Have you forgotten that people have _lost custody of their children_ because the wrong person found out that they were into BDSM? Don’t make baseless accusations about bigotry, because that makes every real instance of it that much harder to fight. When the hell did I use the word ‘bigot’ or ‘prejudice’? The only one currently dramatizing all this to that level is you. ---
**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/47 "2005-11-17T21:02:48Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > As **Miller** showed in the first thread on the subject, there are few topics that won’t bring out the heard of people reminding us in their nasal PC voices that we shouldn’t judge anyone, and that those of us who don’t wish to see something are being “intolerant.” Well, I don’t feel the remotest distaste for bondage, personally. I just find it distasteful to try to sneak it into every discussion. **Miller** is the type of person who would file a lawsuit claiming discrimination if he got fired for wearing assless chaps to work. And you, **CandidGamera** , are apparently the type who would vociferously defend him, and make baseless accusations that anyone who dislikes seeing assless chaps at the grocery store is secretly a homophobic bigot. Did you miss my post where I retracted my comments from the other thread, and apologized for them? ---
**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/48 "2005-11-17T21:10:03Z")
> [@Bryan Ekers](#): > > So… he’s like a one-trick ponygirl? > > 😃 God’ll getcha for that, Bryan! ---
**Author:** ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/49 "2005-11-17T21:10:05Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > \*\* Miller\*\* is the type of person who would file a lawsuit claiming discrimination if he got fired for wearing assless chaps to work. I have it on good authority that most gay guys don’t even like chaps who are assless. ---
**Author:** ![rayh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e79b87/32.png) [@rayh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rayh)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/50 "2005-11-17T21:14:21Z")
Miller is gay??? :eek: _icky_ Evil Captor likes bondage??? The pervert :eek: (Got any to share?) ---
**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/51 "2005-11-17T21:14:57Z")
> [@Contrapuntal](#): > > I have it on good authority that most gay guys don’t even like chaps who are assless. Good one. Damn you for making me laugh with this flu virus. ---
**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/52 "2005-11-17T21:15:43Z")
> [@C K Dexter Haven](#): > > I\If you have a complaint against a member’s specific post, use the REPORT BAD POST button (little exclamation point in the red triangle in the upper right corner of each post.) Let the Moderators decide. > > If you have a complaint against a member per se, then ditto. > \ I’m not sure I understand this; we are supposed to report a member’s post if we have a problem with that member? Are we not allowed to Pit other members any more? ---
**Author:** ![Queuing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/90ced4/32.png) [@Queuing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Queuing)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/53 "2005-11-17T21:16:56Z")
As a fairly new member to this board, I have to say I have noticed none of what you are talking about. As well you keep saying ‘always’ yet can only show us 13 instances of it. This for a person who has over 7300 posts. Hell even if for every link you showed us there was 10 more like them that would still only by about 2% of his posts. If there was 100 more like them that would still be less then 20% of his posts. Hardly what most people would construe as ‘always’. Nonetheless, entertaining pit and I congralute you on it. ---
**Author:** ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/54 "2005-11-17T21:18:31Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > Um, because it’s customary to bring cites to a pit thread? > > Jesus Christ, are you really too stupid to figure that out? Hey, don’t call Jesus stupid. If you didn’t naturally come across these posts, then I do question why you are pitting him or why you are bringing them up. If there was a non-sexual thread that he brought bondage into then bring that up. Then maybe other SDMB members will remember other times he did it and bring those up. It does not seem that you only came across this evidence of his annoying you by looking for it. If you look for something to be offended by, don’t come crying to me when you find it. Now how about talking about the fact that he does not talk bondage all the time, or even most of the time. Maybe the posts you remember most are the bondage ones but it is easy to see that he is not a one trick pony. ---
**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/55 "2005-11-17T21:21:04Z")
> [@CandidGamera](#): > > EVERY opportunity? Exaggerate much? He interjects these little comments occasionally - that much is certain - but when you speculate as to the motivation, you go off into left field. I’ve been known to make the occasional sly, lewd comment from time to time, directed towards the fine womenfolk hereabouts. Ones about how much you’d like to see gratuitous rape scenes added to movies? > [@CandidGamera](#): > > And how many vanilla sex-themed threads have been started on the boards? Hmm. Were you expecting _any_ sort of sex-themed thread to be entitled “What cable channel(s) would you like to created, and what should they show?” > [@CandidGamera](#): > > You don’t seem to take issue with nonsexual one-trick ponies, as indicated by your response to my initial query in that regard. I don’t like _any_ one trick pony. When your one trick is really creepy, though, that makes it that much worse. > [@CandidGamera](#): > > And some people are less close-minded and want to occasionally (and it is only occasionally) discuss such things. Gosh, you’d think the many threads he starts on the subject would be enough, without having to tell us about how _Buffy_ really should have had a running plot line with a sex slave. > [@CandidGamera](#): > > That’s not a solid analogy, and ignoring that for the moment, one can’t prevent someone from taking sexual pleasure from a conversation except by avoiding the conversation. There’s that big old ignore feature… Sure it is. His completely gratuitous references and deceptively-entitled threads are attempts to sneak in a discussion of something when people would otherwise avoid it. ---
**Author:** ![alice\_in\_wonderland](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alice_in_wonderland/32/176_2.png) [@alice\_in\_wonderland](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alice_in_wonderland)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/56 "2005-11-17T21:24:26Z")
I had no idea, whatsoever, that **EC** was into bondage. And I’ve been here for a long time. And I’ve read many of his posts. Somehow it just doesn’t seem like that big of a deal… ---
**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/57 "2005-11-17T21:26:23Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > Gosh, you’d think the many threads he starts on the subject would be enough, without having to tell us about how _Buffy_ really should have had a running plot line with a sex slave. Well, now that you mention it… 😃 ---
**Author:** ![vetbridge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b5e925/32.png) [@vetbridge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vetbridge)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/58 "2005-11-17T21:27:07Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > Let’s face it, BDSM is an unconventional interest I would have agreed 5 years ago. However, lately, it seems that everyone I talk to where sex pops up 😉 has some interest in BDSM. It is something I’ve noticed for a few years. Indeed, when I mentioned this finding to my current gf, she admitted to some interest in being tied up (I may take her up on it. . .film @11)! Personally, I am not offended by **EvilCaptor**. Nor am I offended by posters who are hard core conservative or liberal, or by the churchgoers or the atheists. There are some things that totally repulse me, but I am able to ignore those topics. ---
**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/59 "2005-11-17T21:31:58Z")
> [@Excalibre](#): > > Ones about how much you’d like to see gratuitous rape scenes added to movies? Nah. Not really suited for my sense of humor. > [@](#): > > Hmm. Were you expecting _any_ sort of sex-themed thread to be entitled “What cable channel(s) would you like to created, and what should they show?” No, but I’d expect a number of sex-related responses to such a thread. You’d have to be a fool not to. > [@](#): > > I don’t like _any_ one trick pony. When your one trick is really creepy, though, that makes it that much worse. Again, you’ve just stated that you find his **open interest in Bondage** creepy. Whether you accept it or not, that’s a form of prudishness, even if you’re only prudish that he’s so open about it. > [@](#): > > Gosh, you’d think the many threads he starts on the subject would be enough, without having to tell us about how _Buffy_ really should have had a running plot line with a sex slave. And you’d think I’d have been able to refrain from making a gratuitous Captain America reference in the thread about the Airman found frozen in a glacier. You’d have been wrong. > [@](#): > > Sure it is. His completely gratuitous references and deceptively-entitled threads are attempts to sneak in a discussion of something when people would otherwise avoid it. Deception? Perhaps unclear to the simple, but I don’t think thread titles like the TV Channel one above qualify as deceptive. I don’t really consider whether people want to avoid the discussion or not before inserting a random comic or TV reference. Some people have a lot of contempt for comics. Am I intentionally “forcing” the discussion on them? Or am I just following the path of my own mind, without worrying about what the Offenderati think? ---
**Author:** ![jali](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ecae2f/32.png) [@jali](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jali)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2005, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510/60 "2005-11-17T21:34:35Z")
As a previous poster noted, wouldn’t the “ignore” button work more effectively at keeping you from feeling “icky” than creating a whole new post? How many people do you need to endorse your view? Seems like Jr. High School days when one child would try to get all the kids to hate somebody. I wasn’t paying much attention to Evil Captor, but now I kinda like him…(oops - another one to the dark side). [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510.md?page=2) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/did-you-guys-know-that-evil-captor-likes-bondage-with-bonus-fuck-off-for-miller/331510.md?page=4)