# Difference between informing and promoting?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [January 22, 2013, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027 "2013-01-22T18:38:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/61 "2013-01-23T22:53:27Z")

</div>

> [@Krav\_Manga](#):
>
> I disagree. If Czarcasm’s personal opnion on the use of the phrase ‘it’s better to ask forgiveness than permission’ is relevant, then pointing out his potential hypocrisy is just as relevant.

And I’m telling you it isn’t. Take it to the Pit or drop it now. This is not the Pit lite, and off-topic criticisms of other posters are not welcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![voltaire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voltaire/32/313_2.png) [@voltaire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/voltaire)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/62 "2013-01-23T23:22:46Z")

</div>

Funny thing is, if the thread hadn’t been closed, and this thread opened in response, I probably would never have known that there was a Kickstarter for a documentary on James Randi. And there wouldn’t be this thread full of keywords like “Kickstarter” “documentary” and “James Randi” for Google to index.

I’ll bet this thread has already generated more replies and more page views than that “Kickstarter for a documentary on James Randi” thread ever would have, and fewer people would even know that there’s a documentary about James Randi, titled _An Honest Liar: The Amazing Randi Story_, in the works.

Better to beg forgiveness than to ask permission, indeed. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2013, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/63 "2013-01-23T23:51:45Z")

</div>

> [@voltaire](#):
>
> Funny thing is, if the thread hadn’t been closed, and this thread opened in response, I probably would never have known that there was a Kickstarter for a documentary on James Randi.

And we don’t have a problem with you finding out about it. We ask that people contact us and ask for permission before starting threads about funding efforts like this one. (At least unless we decide on different rules for threads about crowdsourcing.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Barchetta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/da6949/32.png) [@Red\_Barchetta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Red_Barchetta)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/64 "2013-01-24T01:43:18Z")

</div>

> [@TubaDiva](#):
>
> We’re not against it, just want to have some control over it.

You do. You can close the thread after the fact, which is how you’ve moderated practically every other thread for the last, what, 10 years?

Requiring permission for something that’s already been acknowledged to not only have not been clear, but conceded as likely having received approval is silly.

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> But yes, this was a thread about the funding of the movie

No it wasn’t. It was a thread about a movie that’s on Kickstarter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/65 "2013-01-24T01:50:36Z")

</div>

> [@Red\_Barchetta](#):
>
> You do. You can close the thread after the fact, which is how you’ve moderated practically every other thread for the last, what, 10 years?

She didn’t close anything, and **twickster** ’s decision was consistent with how we’ve handled comparable threads in the past. There are some ways in which crowdsourcing-related threads are different, which is why we’re discussing the possibility of moderating them in a different way.

> [@](#):
>
> No it wasn’t. It was a thread about a movie that’s on Kickstarter.

I’m not sure that’s even a distinction, but if it is, it’s a pointless one. I will let you know how the mod discussion is resolved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Odds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/d_odds/32/2882_2.png) [@D\_Odds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Odds)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/66 "2013-01-24T03:40:31Z")

</div>

For the record, I was curious, not accusatory. I should have expected TUS to complain about anything the mods do, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![voltaire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voltaire/32/313_2.png) [@voltaire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/voltaire)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/67 "2013-01-24T06:03:18Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> And we don’t have a problem with you finding out about it.

Oh, I know, but I couldn’t resist pointing out the irony. I bet James Randi himself would get a kick out of it!

> [@](#):
>
> We ask that people contact us and ask for permission before starting threads about funding efforts like this one. (At least unless we decide on different rules for threads about crowdsourcing.)

I’m all for mods having the discretion to use their judgement while performing their modly duties. That said, IMO, the proper judgement in this case would have been to leave that thread alone. If you guys really want to screen and have to approve all threads like that one, no sweat off my back, it just seems so unnecessary.

Had it been a new user posting a drive-by, or someone obviously pimping their own project, I could see the justification. But there have been so many threads equivalent to this one that haven’t been censored and locked, it seems like an overreaction.

Then, when you consider that James Randi is an ally in the fight against ignorance, the censoring of such a naturally cromulent thread seems way over the top. There are probably a lot of regulars here who are/would be interested in that thread, and that fact alone should be sufficient justification for leaving it be.

All IMHO, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/68 "2013-01-24T15:48:34Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> In that example you’re not trying to get the poster to buy anything. The poster has already stated his intent to the part and you’re suggesting someplace he can get it. Again, we’ve always allowed this. We don’t actually have to revisit every old decision just because someone asks a question about something new. 😉

I wasn’t trying to revisit an old decision, I’ve never seen a decision on that. I was just seeking reassurance that it _is_ OK, since I’ve seen it happen, and it didn’t occur to me until this thread that it might even be _close_ to the line. I just wanted to find out for certain that it was on the good side of the line. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/69 "2013-01-24T16:19:31Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> I wasn’t trying to revisit an old decision, I’ve never seen a decision on that. I was just seeking reassurance that it _is_ OK, since I’ve seen it happen, and it didn’t occur to me until this thread that it might even be _close_ to the line. I just wanted to find out for certain that it was on the good side of the line. 😉

No problem. I do want to make it clear that we’re discussing how to handle Kickstarter/IndieGogo threads because of the fundraising issue, not revisiting all our policies on linking or recommendations about websites and things like that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2013, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/70 "2013-01-24T16:23:52Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> She didn’t close anything, and **twickster** ’s decision was consistent with how we’ve handled comparable threads in the past. There are some ways in which crowdsourcing-related threads are different, which is why we’re discussing the possibility of moderating them in a different way.

I definitely appreciate y’all having that discussion. I can see why the call was made the way it was made, but I think the closed thread is a great example of why that rule needs tweaking: closing that thread diminished, rather than improved, the board, and if there’s a tweak to the rule that will allow such threads to go forth even if the poster in question forgets to PM y’all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Irishman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b487fb/32.png) [@Irishman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Irishman)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 7:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/71 "2013-01-25T19:04:59Z")

</div>

> [@Bob Ducca](#):
>
> So you’re confirming that it was definitely better for them to just go ahead and do something without asking you first since you would have said no.

That depends on what the sanctions are vs sanctions for asking permission, not receiving it, and then doing it anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Astral\_Rejection](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/258eb7/32.png) [@Astral\_Rejection](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Astral_Rejection)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/72 "2013-01-25T20:06:52Z")

</div>

Is there any project - be it game, movie, whatever - on Kickstarter that the mods would NOT approve if permission was requested? If the answer is no, why require permission?

If somebody is promoting their own Kickstarter and this is deemed inappropriate, close that thread.  
If somebody is opening a thread solely to solicit funding for a Kickstarter, close that thread.  
If somebody is just talking about a project that happens to be on kickstarter, who does that hurt?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/73 "2013-01-25T20:11:40Z")

</div>

> [@Astral\_Rejection](#):
>
> Is there any project - be it game, movie, whatever - on Kickstarter that the mods would NOT approve if permission was requested?

We approve most requests of this type. But people are creative and we would rather see the requests first instead of watching someone post something inappropriate and then having to deal with complaints about why we didn’t stop it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/74 "2013-01-25T21:09:15Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> We approve most requests of this type. But people are creative and we would rather see the requests first instead of watching someone post something inappropriate and then having to deal with complaints about why we didn’t stop it.

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly as a poster I’d prefer just the opposite: I’d prefer that people are given wide latitude, and that moderators similarly have wide latitude to stop things that harm the messageboard. There will always be people who want exact rules, but I think they don’t understand what makes for a good board, and may safely be dismissed. Focus on the end goal–a good messageboard–and mod accordingly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![voltaire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voltaire/32/313_2.png) [@voltaire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/voltaire)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/75 "2013-01-25T22:09:12Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I get where you’re coming from, but honestly as a poster I’d prefer just the opposite: I’d prefer that people are given wide latitude, and that moderators similarly have wide latitude to stop things that harm the messageboard. There will always be people who want exact rules, but I think they don’t understand what makes for a good board, and may safely be dismissed. Focus on the end goal–a good messageboard–and mod accordingly.

This. (which was worded much more succinctly than my previous post)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/76 "2013-01-25T22:16:31Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I get where you’re coming from, but honestly as a poster I’d prefer just the opposite: I’d prefer that people are given wide latitude, and that moderators similarly have wide latitude to stop things that harm the messageboard.

The problem is that people want to know ahead of time what they can do and what they can’t, or how they can get permission to do something without breaking the rules. I think posters and mods do have pretty wide latitude, but simply asserting “we have wide latitude to stop things that harm the message board” doesn’t satisfy people when they want the rules explained or what they can expect from the mods.

> [@](#):
>
> Focus on the end goal–a good messageboard–and mod accordingly.

That’s what we’re doing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Barchetta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/da6949/32.png) [@Red\_Barchetta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Red_Barchetta)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/77 "2013-01-25T22:47:49Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> That’s what we’re doing.

By closing a thread no one wanted closed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/78 "2013-01-25T22:51:11Z")

</div>

> [@Red\_Barchetta](#):
>
> By closing a thread no one wanted closed?

And how was _this_ fact determined? Was there a poll in IMHO I missed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Barchetta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/da6949/32.png) [@Red\_Barchetta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Red_Barchetta)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/79 "2013-01-25T22:52:59Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> And how was _this_ fact determined? Was there a poll in IMHO I missed?

Have you not actually read any of this thread?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2013, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027/80 "2013-01-25T22:54:22Z")

</div>

> [@Red\_Barchetta](#):
>
> Have you not actually read any of this thread?

Yep. Got an answer to my question?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/difference-between-informing-and-promoting/648027.md?page=5)
