# Digital art creator algorithm website

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** arts-crafts, ai\
**Created:** [April 1, 2022, 1:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081 "2022-04-01T01:26:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 112

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2025, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2223 "2025-01-22T20:07:06Z")

</div>

BTW, both of the original sites I once used for outpainting square images are no longer usable, but some googling found plenty of other free options. Here are three. Of those, Pixelcut gives you the highest resolution.

[https://www.pixelcut.ai/t/uncrop](https://www.pixelcut.ai/t/uncrop)

> **[AI Image Uncrop | Extend Image Online Free](https://imglarger.com/uncrop)**
>
> Unlock the full potential of your photos with Imglarger's AI uncrop tool. Effortlessly extend and resize images online to fit any aspect ratio while maintaining quality.

> **[Uncrop & Extend Images for Free – Uncrop.com](https://www.uncrop.com/)**
>
> Uncrop and expand your images in 5 seconds with just one click. Extend images in any direction. It's fast, automatic, and free!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odzi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odzi/32/18375_2.png) [@Odzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odzi)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2025, 12:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2224 "2025-01-23T12:09:21Z")

</div>

A lot of these are nightmare fuel. Like if I was really high and found this thread, it would have been bad.

I also thought this was a shill for that website, glad to see that people are having fun with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2025, 2:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2225 "2025-01-23T14:11:09Z")

</div>

> [@Odzi](#):
>
> A lot of these are nightmare fuel. Like if I was really high and found this thread, it would have been bad.

If you’re starting from the top, these attempts were from 2022. A lot has changed since then. If you’re saying in general – well, kinda sorta. I think most images posted were chosen _because_ they were weird or funny-tragic versus “Here’s a nice mountain I prompted”.

This made me go way up to the top to look at what we thought was awesome in 2022. That’s definitely some… stuff. For funsies, I grabbed a few old Night Cafe prompts from that era and re-ran them in Midjourney straight up with no additional prompting aside from the same general image ratio in a few. Posted the entire MJ preview rather than pick one to upscale.

- A Sordid Affair

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/y89ASnUwtrtfWuYCkcBr/y89ASnUwtrtfWuYCkcBr.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/y89ASnUwtrtfWuYCkcBr/y89ASnUwtrtfWuYCkcBr.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/ZVB5Qgu.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/ZVB5Qgu.jpeg)

This was (and maybe still is) my most upvoted NC image at the time. I still kinda like it! The MJ stuff is all very romance novel cover and the NC result was weird and abstract but still conveys illicit sensuality.

- Post-apocalyptic city built around the legs of a rustic giant

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/sxsm6mj7N1h2uwS3MHlh/sxsm6mj7N1h2uwS3MHlh.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/sxsm6mj7N1h2uwS3MHlh/sxsm6mj7N1h2uwS3MHlh.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/av97R42.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/av97R42.jpeg)

The obvious different here is the point of view. It would be trivial to make MJ create an aerial image of the scene with some additional prompting but it didn’t. The NC image is far less refined but makes for a more interesting scene (IMO) of a settlement arising from the ruins and materials of this giant.

- Lizard Cowboys in the Style of Frederic Remington

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/ElvgKvkUSnWZQhW7H3nu/ElvgKvkUSnWZQhW7H3nu.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/ElvgKvkUSnWZQhW7H3nu/ElvgKvkUSnWZQhW7H3nu.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/l7voq5Q.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/l7voq5Q.jpeg)

Again, the obvious difference is that one has lizards dressed as cowboys and the other mainly has cowboys riding lizards. And, again, it would be trivial to ask for lizards in cowboy hats instead if that was my desire. MJ did a far better job of making a faux-Remington though NC gave it a solid 2022 try.

- The Shug Monkey of Cambridgeshire

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/e2GFwrc8PK1zXnd0os8U/e2GFwrc8PK1zXnd0os8U.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/e2GFwrc8PK1zXnd0os8U/e2GFwrc8PK1zXnd0os8U.jpg?tr=w-1600,c-at_max)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/UDCuB1o.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/UDCuB1o.jpeg)

The Shug Monkey is a B-tier cryptid from England, supposedly a dog-headed ape first “sighted” in the WWII era. I didn’t seriously expect either to know what it was though NC made a weird monster picture and MJ just gave me monkeys.

- A Bucket of Fire Except The Fire Is Green And Also There’s An Egg Whisk In It

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/3eygM2K1OydaRTQty6Wd/3eygM2K1OydaRTQty6Wd.jpg) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/3eygM2K1OydaRTQty6Wd/3eygM2K1OydaRTQty6Wd.jpg)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/EaC2cL4.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/EaC2cL4.jpeg)

This was just a coherence test and 2024 MJ wins easily over 2022 NC. Shocker.

- Flirty Robot

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/Pfwi1cKG32lErwx94KcP/Pfwi1cKG32lErwx94KcP.jpg) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/Pfwi1cKG32lErwx94KcP/Pfwi1cKG32lErwx94KcP.jpg)  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/1ExrcfI.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/1ExrcfI.jpeg)

I was delighted by this NC guy when I first saw it and I still think it has its charms though its deficiencies are also on display. None of the MJ ones match it in storybook style though 1 & 2 are perfectly nice flirty robots.

Again, just for my amusement and no real conclusions to be had. _Obviously_ the newer model can do things more realistically and coherently. The NC images I posted were picked because they were “good” and didn’t represent my average output (and leave out big weaknesses like rendering people) while the MJ images were single runs. And, of course, 2025 NC is running off various Stable Diffusion models that are well updated. Just a stroll down memory lane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2025, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2226 "2025-01-23T15:25:04Z")

</div>

I tried The Shug Monkey of Cambridgeshire in Bing and got dreadfully cheery things.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/tdpWQEZ.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/tdpWQEZ.jpeg)

I added one of my standard descriptors for more realism, grainy disposable camera snapshot

[![](https://i.imgur.com/Ar7ha8C.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/Ar7ha8C.jpeg)

I like the creepy simian Queen Elizabeth in this one.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/UwAaLCq.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/UwAaLCq.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2025, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2227 "2025-01-25T00:00:50Z")

</div>

In the most recent episode of _Severance_ someone is called a “fetid moppet”. And the episode before that mentions “fruit leather” as a snack option. So I try for “fetid moppet eating fruit leather in an office cubicle”. SDXL, Flux, and even SD 1.5 know that “moppet” is a term for a child. Dalle-3 (via Bing) has no clue and consistently creates strange hairy creatures. (Imagen rejected the prompt as being unacceptable.)

[![](https://i.imgur.com/1byUCfw.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/1byUCfw.jpeg)

(All of them seem to know that “fruit leather” is apparently what I always knew as “fruit roll-ups” and had never once before heard called “fruit leather”.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 4:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2228 "2025-02-10T04:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> OK, promptsmiths, anyone want to help me out with this one? I’m trying to create an image for a flyer for my school’s Bike to School Day. My first try at a prompt was “Purple jaguar riding a bicycle”, using NightCafe’s Stable Diffusion. Results were… not great.  
> [https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/g1Y72aTi4aaM0XTiQ2L7/g1Y72aTi4aaM0XTiQ2L7--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at\_max](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/g1Y72aTi4aaM0XTiQ2L7/g1Y72aTi4aaM0XTiQ2L7--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at_max)  
> Then I thought that maybe the purple was asking too much of it, and it’d do better without the color specified: “A jaguar riding a bicycle”.  
> [https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/QSWGLMHM7YIsxKusYchx/QSWGLMHM7YIsxKusYchx--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at\_max](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/QSWGLMHM7YIsxKusYchx/QSWGLMHM7YIsxKusYchx--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at_max)  
> OK, that’s two credible jaguars without bikes, and one credible bicyclist without a jaguar, and one only one with both… with the jaguar apparently steering with its chin and pedaling with its forepaws.
> 
> OK, third try: “Jaguar riding a bicycle, side view”.
> 
> [https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/JFEsaixKbC9l6NENUHfM/JFEsaixKbC9l6NENUHfM--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at\_max](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/JFEsaixKbC9l6NENUHfM/JFEsaixKbC9l6NENUHfM--grid.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at_max)  
> This is not an improvement.
> 
> I have over a hundred credits that I can throw at this, if need be, but I’d rather not just flail around in the dark. Any suggestions?

Tonight some playing around led to a prompt involving a cat on a bicycle, and it made me remember this old request. I wanted to see how Bing/Dall-E 3 handled it. The results are of course much better, but still flawed. There especially is trouble with the handlebars and pedals. Here’s a gallery of tries.

[[Album] imgur.com ![](https://i.imgur.com/xi7iQvQ.jpeg?fb "imgur.com") ](https://imgur.com/a/CQDd7k1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2229 "2025-02-10T22:47:24Z")

</div>

As it happens, there’s now another AI image on flyers around the school, which wasn’t my doing. The flyers are suggesting that students try a “social media purge” for Lent (we’re a Catholic school), and show a bunch of social media icons being flushed down a toilet. I’ll see if I can get a picture.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2230 "2025-02-10T22:49:40Z")

</div>

Oh, and from that album, this one wasn’t too bad:  
[![](https://i.imgur.com/gnLEzgl.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/gnLEzgl.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2025, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2231 "2025-02-11T02:11:22Z")

</div>

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/x7uz20KNpS7DrecCDGgp/x7uz20KNpS7DrecCDGgp--0--q7rcp.jpg?tr=w-1200,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/x7uz20KNpS7DrecCDGgp/x7uz20KNpS7DrecCDGgp--0--q7rcp.jpg?tr=w-1200,c-at_max)

Model: Flux Schnell  
Preset: Modern Comic  
Prompt: funny anthropomorphic purple jaguar riding a red bicycle, wearing a top hat

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2025, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2232 "2025-02-11T02:15:36Z")

</div>

Got both handlebars and one out of two foot pedals. Pretty good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ponderoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ponderoid/32/19221_2.png) [@Ponderoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ponderoid)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2025, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2233 "2025-02-12T00:54:33Z")

</div>

I’ve _never_ managed to get an AI image of both feet properly arranged on bicycle pedals.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tibby](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tibby/32/17030_2.png) [@Tibby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tibby)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2025, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2234 "2025-02-12T01:10:15Z")

</div>

1 [almost] out of 3 ain’t bad:

[![](https://i.imgur.com/F5w2b1Z.jpg) ](https://i.imgur.com/F5w2b1Z.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2025, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2235 "2025-02-13T00:55:23Z")

</div>

I looked to see if Bing had a better concept of a pogo stick since the last time I tried. Still no. Occasionally one image is mostly right but they are usually from substantially wrong to wildly wrong.

[[Album] imgur.com ![](https://i.imgur.com/o6TyOF6.jpeg?fb "imgur.com") ](https://imgur.com/a/mBEuW5X)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2025, 9:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2236 "2025-02-13T09:26:45Z")

</div>

You can always use start images, plus “depth to image”.

For example, take this image.

[![](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/29/ee/04/29ee0439df9da5a524715447f54847da.jpg) ](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/29/ee/04/29ee0439df9da5a524715447f54847da.jpg)

Then use the prompt “Frog on a pogo stick” gives this

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/nQuzXMsN4TRgHfx0IAhB/nQuzXMsN4TRgHfx0IAhB--0--kwguk.jpg?tr=w-1200,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/nQuzXMsN4TRgHfx0IAhB/nQuzXMsN4TRgHfx0IAhB--0--kwguk.jpg?tr=w-1200,c-at_max)

Nightcafe, model Boltning XL V1 Lightning

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2025, 7:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2237 "2025-02-19T07:01:12Z")

</div>

Back in 2022 I posted about attempting to create a horror Great Pumpkin rising above a pumpkin patch using the arcane near-gibberish prompts we had to use back then. In my latest experimentation I tried the concept with Bing/Dall-E 3 with pretty good success finally, even able to insert Charlie Brown into the images. I then took one of those prompts and plugged it into other models, including the ancient Night Cafe “Artistic” and “Coherent”. Here are images created in each of the models, at the default available resolution of each model and in widescreen when available, square when not.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/To9zmJV.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/To9zmJV.jpeg)

[![](https://i.imgur.com/FQ5E09y.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/FQ5E09y.jpeg)

The prompt used:

> **Summary**
>
> terrified charlie brown escaping from a towering angry orange jack-o’-lantern ghost vine hybrid in the background in a scary pumpkin patch on halloween; by junji ito and dan witz, realistic grainy disposable camera snapshot with bokeh, motion blur, shallow dof and forced perspective.

While the SDXL and Flux images are coherent and attractive, only Bing “gets it”.

Here’s a gallery of more Bing outputs with various prompts, all outpainted to widescreen.

[[Album] imgur.com ![](https://i.imgur.com/r9xYER0.jpeg?fb "imgur.com") ](https://imgur.com/a/J291AAw)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2025, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2238 "2025-02-20T00:52:55Z")

</div>

I think that Bing has fairly recently implemented what I suppose could be called a “cuteness filter” as censorship. Where for prompts that the “guardrails” don’t like instead of blocking it completely it renders something with a distinctive style with pastel colors and cute animals and flowers and butterflies and such that may only vaguely match elements from the prompt. A single word in the post can trigger it. Changing the one word back and forth gives constant results between “cute” images and “normal” images. For instance, the prompt

> terrified scowling leucotic person snail fingerprint hybrid with many fingers tipped with hands that are holding **eyeballs** as legs. climbing a slimy toadstool in a rainy forest clearing; grainy disposable camera snapshot with bokeh, motion blur, shallow dof and forced perspective.

triggers the cuteness:

[![](https://i.imgur.com/TQy6d1o.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/TQy6d1o.jpeg)

But change one word and it gets back to the general type of image I was looking for:

> terrified scowling leucotic person snail fingerprint hybrid with many fingers tipped with hands that are holding **eyes** as legs. climbing a slimy toadstool in a rainy forest clearing; grainy disposable camera snapshot with bokeh, motion blur, shallow dof and forced perspective.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/TvrtxzG.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/TvrtxzG.jpeg)

(BTW, “eyeballs” works in some other prompts, I’m not certain which word in this prompt it isn’t allowed to combine with.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ponderoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ponderoid/32/19221_2.png) [@Ponderoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ponderoid)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2025, 3:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2239 "2025-02-20T03:45:04Z")

</div>

ChatGPT as of yet isn’t triggering anything yet when I tried the two different prompts:

[![](https://i.gyazo.com/3082256c2356a489bb42a3701e18aa6f.jpg) ](https://i.gyazo.com/3082256c2356a489bb42a3701e18aa6f.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2025, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2240 "2025-02-20T03:48:42Z")

</div>

Maybe layered on by Microsoft, then.

(The first is closer to the “holding eyeballs” I was imagining than the others.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2025, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2241 "2025-02-21T23:55:33Z")

</div>

Another example of triggering the “cute” filter in Bing. Today I was playing with versions of this prompt:

> four flabby wrinkled the beatles on a mushroom dressed as the beatles playing band instruments, in a _ **x** _ forest. grainy disposable camera snapshot with bokeh, motion blur, shallow dof and forced perspective.

I was trying to get a dead-looking forest in the background.

“scary forest” gets images like this:

[![](https://i.imgur.com/oEu7uJt.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/oEu7uJt.jpeg)

“Halloween forest” gets images like this:

[![](https://i.imgur.com/pYIQOYd.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/pYIQOYd.jpeg)

“scary Halloween” triggers the “cute” filter:

[![](https://i.imgur.com/BHROcWD.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/BHROcWD.jpeg)

But “Halloween scary” goes back to normal.

[![](https://i.imgur.com/zyYySZc.jpeg) ](https://i.imgur.com/zyYySZc.jpeg)

The style changes with the modified prompts are consistent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2025, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081/2242 "2025-02-28T06:45:51Z")

</div>

Nightcafe has new versions of Ideogram available. Handling of typography better than ever.

[![](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/45uK7koN5enR9MXEWV4M/45uK7koN5enR9MXEWV4M--zh88r.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at_max) ](https://images.nightcafe.studio/jobs/45uK7koN5enR9MXEWV4M/45uK7koN5enR9MXEWV4M--zh88r.jpg?tr=w-1080,c-at_max)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081.md?page=111)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-art-creator-algorithm-website/962081.md?page=113)
