# Digital Pics - Print Quality

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 24, 2012, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289 "2012-07-24T22:01:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanDiegoTim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/85e7bf/32.png) [@SanDiegoTim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanDiegoTim)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2012, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289/1 "2012-07-24T22:01:19Z")

</div>

I’ve got to print and then a few digital pics. Will use my basic HP all-in-one printer It’s a very basic unit. Given that I don’t want to re-print and re-frame anytime soon, would I be better off taking my thumb drive to a Costco or Walgreens and using their printers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GaryM](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garym/32/241_2.png) [@GaryM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GaryM)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2012, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289/2 "2012-07-24T22:06:23Z")

</div>

Perhaps. Is your model one with the light magenta and light cyan in addition to the standard three plus black? My recently replaced HP 3 in 1 had two blacks as well. Using premium paper I’d use the HP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2012, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289/3 "2012-07-24T22:14:19Z")

</div>

Photo prints are probably better for light-fastness than cheap inkjets. If you hang it on a wall near a bright window, blow the money for a photo print. Considering what even a 8x10 costs (about $1 around here, a 12x18 $3), compared to 15 years ago when they cost $40 or more - it’s worth it for a framed picture. You spend more for a cup of coffee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AaronX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/7bcc69/32.png) [@AaronX](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AaronX)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2012, 3:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289/4 "2012-07-25T03:45:08Z")

</div>

You mean you want them to last? Definitely go to the shops. In fact, they’re probably cheaper (I think about $8 for A4 size) - in home printing you pay for convenience and immediacy. Also since your printer is basic, the print quality will be better from the shops.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2012, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/digital-pics-print-quality/629289/5 "2012-07-25T04:43:46Z")

</div>

> [@AaronX](#):
>
> You mean you want them to last? Definitely go to the shops. In fact, they’re probably cheaper (I think about $8 for A4 size) - in home printing you pay for convenience and immediacy. Also since your printer is basic, the print quality will be better from the shops.

Huh? Costco Canada lists 8x10 for $1.49; Costco Leeds lists 10x8 (?) for L1.09 so prices for page sized photos are what could be loosely describe as cheap, cheap, effin’ cheap!

Colorfast is probably much better with real photo paper rather than relying on inkjet ink.
