# Disagreement in the cockpit \[8/22/2022\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [November 1, 2023, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428 "2023-11-01T17:30:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2023, 1:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428/41 "2023-11-03T13:11:44Z")

</div>

Sorta sounds to me like every business and government agency should go through their entire personnel roster looking for anyone who’s anti-vax. In and of itself that’s not disqualifying; it’s simply a (dumb) personal preference.

But if a careful psych eval uncovers evidence of Q-acquired-lunacy, then that person needs to be deprived of all responsibility, security access, etc. And any firearms. Perhaps they can safely be left to mind a 7-11 store, but they sure don’t belong in any position of respect or responsibility. Too detached from reality and too unpredictable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aceplace57](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aceplace57/32/3500_2.png) [@aceplace57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aceplace57)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2023, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428/42 "2023-11-03T13:42:03Z")

</div>

Thanks @LSLGuy

Your posts are always informative.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2023, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428/43 "2023-11-13T13:34:23Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> Seems like we’re not hearing the entire story. Maybe these two men had prior arguments? Some bad history between them?

No, he’s just a selfish asshole, through and through. See his COVID vaccine avoidance priors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2023, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428/44 "2023-11-13T13:58:51Z")

</div>

> [@LSLGuy](#):
>
> Sorta sounds to me like every business and government agency should go through their entire personnel roster looking for anyone who’s anti-vax. In and of itself that’s not disqualifying; it’s simply a (dumb) personal preference.

The request for a vaccine exemption looks like Dunn was making a political objection, not a religious one.

> [@](#):
>
> Dunn’s lawyers said he had received many other vaccines but raised a religious objection to the COVID-19 vaccine because government leaders elevated it from a health measure to a procedure with “symbolic and sacramental quality.”

What a load of 💩 💩 💩.

Most antivaxers are not threats to commit violence. The further out their statements and actions get, the more they _should_ be viewed as a potential threat.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/disagreement-in-the-cockpit-8-22-2022/992428.md?page=2)