# Discussion thread for the Hamas Attacks Israel thread, October 2023

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Tags:** israel-hamas-war\
**Created:** [October 9, 2023, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317 "2023-10-09T15:10:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 302

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6158 "2026-06-30T12:58:40Z")

</div>

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> So this is what it’s come to? You’re calling it a big win and spiking the ball because maybe the number of journalists murdered is only about 40% of what some people claimed?

You don’t find it troubling that a supposed human rights organization _ **lied** _ about the _ **majority** _ of the supposed “reporters” who were killed? You don’t think this pokes a hole in the idea that Israel deliberately targets journalists? Fair enough, I guess positions that weren’t arrived at by reason to begin with aren’t really subject to debunking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2026, 1:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6159 "2026-06-30T13:02:52Z")

</div>

First off, why should we trust your link? I’ve never heard of the organization that produced it. Why do you consider them credible? Second, it appears that their criteria for considering someone a “member” of a terrorist group doesn’t involve actually committing terrorism — any affiliation at all with such organizations is apparently justification for killing them. Lastly, even taking this hasbara at face value, there are still over a hundred legitimate journalists who have been killed!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2026, 1:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6160 "2026-06-30T13:12:23Z")

</div>

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> First off, why should we trust your link? I’ve never heard of the organization that produced it.

You shouldn’t! Unlike the CJP, they aren’t asking you to trust them, they’re showing their work.

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> Second, it appears that their criteria for considering someone a “member” of a terrorist group doesn’t involve actually committing terrorism — any affiliation at all with such organizations is apparently justification for killing them.

Yes? Do you know how war works? Hamas, PIJ, and their cohorts attacked Israel and are now at war with Israel. Do you think Hamas support personnel are protected?

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> Lastly, even taking this hasbara at face value,

Lol, scary Hebrew words 🙄 Apparently Jew propaganda is so scary it needs a special seekret word.

There is very little difference between the insistence that anything Jewish people say about Israel is “hasbara” and the right wing obsession with calling every time a Muslim makes a claim you disagree with “taqiyya”. The horseshoe really is circular these days.

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> Lastly, even taking this hasbara at face value, there are still over a hundred legitimate journalists who have been killed!

The claim the anti"Zionist" side makes isn’t “journalists died”, it’s “Israel deliberately targets journalists in order to cover up the gEnOcIdE”. And their evidence for this is a list of 266 people most of whom are indeed terrorists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2026, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6161 "2026-06-30T20:18:39Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> You shouldn’t! Unlike the CJP, they aren’t asking you to trust them, they’re showing their work.

This is a joke. They aren’t remotely “showing their work”. They make unsupported claims, like that Anas Al Sharif was a militant member of Hamas.

This is just mass murder apologia. It’s meant to give a patina of legitimacy to supporters of Israel who aren’t willing to openly support mass murder of civilians. It’s not meant to actually convince anyone skeptical of official Israeli justifications for atrocities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6162 "2026-07-03T03:48:51Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> They make unsupported claims, like that Anas Al Sharif was a militant member of Hamas.

Wasnt he one of the Journalists that you claimed were blocked from getting into Gaza?

The problem here is we have a Journalist embedded into Gaza by Al Jazeera, and clearly biased. Could he be part of Hamas? Maybe, but how can you tell either way? They dont wear uniforms or carry ID cards. Nor was it claimed that all those Journalist were Hamas- most were " _affiliated with terrorist organizations, primarily Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ_".

This study- altho certainly biased- does have methodology and _seems_ legit.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> surprise suprise (just kiddind, it’s not surprising at all) - [over 60% were actually part of Hamas or other terrorist groups](https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/about-60-of-the-gazans-classified-as-journalists-and-other-media-personnel-killed-in-the-gaza-strip-war-belonged-to-hamas-and-other-terrorist-organizations/). Shocking, I know it is not.

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> Lastly, even taking this hasbara at face value, there are still over a hundred legitimate journalists who have been killed!

Yes, legit Journalists die during war. Ernie Pyle for instance. They die even when not specially targeted (which is against the Conventions). Marie Colvin, Giles Duley / Tim Hetherington / Chris Hondros, and many others. Often by indirect action, sometimes by other bad stuff. It is a dangerous job. If you are in a war zone and you are hit by rocket/mortar, etc fire, it is a tragedy, but not a warcrime. If you ID yourself and they line you up against a wall and shoot you anyway, like Joseph Morton by the Gestapo, that is a warcrime. (and the SS General who ordered the killing of Morton was executed as a war criminal.).

So, this is a tough call. If killed by indirect fire in a war zone, “you knew the job was dangerous when you took it.” Lined up against the wall and executed after IDing- warcrime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 8:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6163 "2026-07-03T08:01:36Z")

</div>

This isn’t remotely just collateral damage. Journalists in Gaza are directly threatened and then targeted for death by IDF forces:

> **[Killing of journalists in the Gaza war](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_journalists_in_the_Gaza_war?wprov=sfla1)**
>
> Background

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 9:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6164 "2026-07-03T09:59:55Z")

</div>

…for the purposes of debate, let’s accept this number.

Do you concede that Israel has targeted and killed over 100 journalists since October 7th, 2023? And that the “Israel Defense Forces (has still) has committed more targeted killings of journalists than any other government’s military since CPJ began documentation in 1992?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 10:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6165 "2026-07-03T10:27:29Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> The problem here is we have a Journalist embedded into Gaza by Al Jazeera, and clearly biased.

…I’m not sure what you are suggesting here. Al Jazeera is biased. The Jerusalem Post is also biased. Israeli journalists, almost all of them have served in the IDF, are embedded in Gaza.

Are Isreali journalists legitimate targets?

Here is video footage of an Isreali TV presenter taking part in blowing up a building.

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/qIJo6Q3SVbs/maxresdefault.jpg "Israeli TV host faces backlash for blowing up house in Lebanon | Al Jazeera Newsfeed") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIJo6Q3SVbs)

Is he a combatant? A terrorist? Am I biased because I used a video on Al Jazeera’s YouTube channel? Do you not believe the reporting because of who reported it? What is the bigger issue here, that I cited Al Jazeera or a reporter is taking part in what is probably a warcrime?

> They dont wear uniforms or carry ID cards.

They are wearing blue reporters vests if they are targeted in the field or they are wearing normal civilian clothes when they are targeted (along with their families) in their family homes. What clothes do you suggest they wear when they are cooking dinner for their kids?

> If you are in a war zone and you are hit by rocket/mortar, etc fire, it is a tragedy, but not a warcrime.

But we are talking about over 200 documented cases of targeted killings. We know the details of how all of these journalists were killed. Some of them got phone calls to tell them they were targets. We can’t pretend that didn’t happen. We can’t pretend we don’t know how they died. They were not accidental or incidental killings. They were _targeted_ killings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 12:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6166 "2026-07-03T12:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> Do you concede that Israel has targeted and killed over 100 journalists since October 7th, 2023?

No, of course not. The fact that the CPJ lied about 60% of the names they gave doesn’t mean that everyone else was ‘targeted’. In fact, the research paper does mention what the strikes that killed actual journalists were targeting. It is unfortunate that Hamas ensures their military operations occur in places that put civilians at risk, but that is a deliberate action on Hamas’ part.

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> But we are talking about over 200 documented cases of targeted killings.

…no, we aren’t. You and some NGO saying “this was targeted” doesn’t make it so, especially when over half the people you claim were targeted for being journalists were actually terrorists.

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> Some of them got phone calls to tell them they were targets.

…no, they didn’t. Some of them got phone calls telling them to evacuate their homes, because their homes were in a place being used by Hamas or PIJ for military operations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6167 "2026-07-03T13:00:43Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The fact that the CPJ lied about 60% of the names they gave

This is not remotely a fact. It’s an unsupported statement made by Israeli apologists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6168 "2026-07-03T13:00:59Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> No, of course not.

…why not?

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The fact that the CPJ lied about 60% of the names they gave doesn’t mean that everyone else was ‘targeted’.

The allegation that the CPJ has “lied” here is a serious one. We should take it seriously.

Your cite doesn’t allege any lies. I’ve reviewed the documents, and they don’t go that far as far as I can see. So where does the claim of “lies” come from? What lies are you specifically talking about?

In fact: on reviewing the report it says things like this a lot:

“Organizational Affiliation: **Apparently** affiliated with Hamas.”

Bolding mine. That doesn’t really sound definitive to me.

And the fact that this organisation operates within “the Center for the Commemoration of the Heritage and Intelligence Community,” which some describe that as the “the public face of the Israeli intelligence community,” doesn’t exactly paint them as a neutral, unbiased source.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> …no, we aren’t.

Yeah we are.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> You and some NGO saying “this was targeted” doesn’t make it so, especially when over half the people you claim were targeted for being journalists were actually terrorists.

It isn’t just one NGO. Multiple press agencies and multiple independent NGO’s report both this and higher numbers. I’m perfectly happy to accept the CPJ numbers, even the reduced numbers. I see no reason why we shouldn’t.

And we know the circumstances of each death.

> **[Explore CPJ's database of attacks on the press](https://cpj.org/data/killed/2025/?status=Killed&type%5B%5D=Journalist&type%5B%5D=Media%20Worker&motiveConfirmed%5B%5D=Confirmed&motiveUnconfirmed%5B%5D=Unconfirmed&start_year=2025&end_year=2025&group_by=location)**
>
> Latest press freedom news from around the globe.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> especially when over half the people you claim were targeted for being journalists were actually terrorists.

Cite please. Not just “afflilated with Hamas” because Hamas was the government and everyone who worked for the government was Hamas, including paramedics and hospital workers and aid workers. Cite that they were terrorists.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> …no, they didn’t.

Yeah they did.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Some of them got phone calls telling them to evacuate their homes,

Anas al-Sharif: an actual journalist (and not an operative as claimed by the report and the IDF), received [threats](https://cpj.org/2025/07/cpj-calls-for-anas-al-sharifs-protection-in-face-of-israeli-smears/) both over the phone and live on air.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> because their homes were in a place being used by Hamas or PIJ for military operations.

The scale of destruction in Gaza fits a pattern of intentional destruction, often just for the sake of destruction. There is no clear pattern of targeting Hamas or the PIJ.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6169 "2026-07-03T13:22:03Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> Anas al-Sharif: an actual journalist (and not an operative as claimed by the report and the IDF),

I mean, he was a terrorist, according to Hamas’ own records. If you want to pretend otherwise, I cannot stop you, but it’s a fact.

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> The scale of destruction in Gaza fits a pattern of intentional destruction, often just for the sake of destruction. There is no clear pattern of targeting Hamas or the PIJ.

If we pretend that terrorists like al-Shariff were not terrorists, we can make all kinds of claims about the conflict. Doesn’t make them _true_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6170 "2026-07-03T13:28:40Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> I mean, he was a terrorist, according to Hamas’ own records.

This is not remotely a factual statement. At most, an Israeli-intelligence-produced document says someone with that name once did some training with Hamas, many years ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6171 "2026-07-03T13:30:29Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> I mean, he was a terrorist, accord8ng to Hamas’ own records.

…According to the IDF, they have a spreadsheet with a line item that says that many years ago he _may_ have been a soldier. We’ve seen a screenshot of the spreadsheet entry. I’m not convinced. Neither are organisations like the CPJ.

> **[Anas al-Sharif - Committee to Protect Journalists](https://cpj.org/data/people/anas-al-sharif/)**

> [@](#):
>
> Al Jazeera reporter [Anas al-Sharif](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/10/al-jazeera-journalist-anas-al-sharif-killed-in-israeli-attack-in-gaza-city) was [murdered](https://cpj.org/2025/08/israel-kills-al-jazeera-journalists-in-targeted-gaza-city-airstrike/) in a targeted Israeli strike on a [tent](https://www.alaraby.co.uk/entertainment_media/%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%AE%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A9-%D8%B5%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%87%D9%85-%D8%A3%D9%86%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%81-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D9%82%D8%B5%D9%81-%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%BA%D8%B2%D8%A9) housing journalists outside the main gate of Gaza City’s Al-Shifa Hospital. The [attack](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqyyrp3yq9o) killed [Al Jazeera’s](https://network.aljazeera.net/en/press-releases/al-jazeera-condemns-assassination-its-journalists-israeli-occupation-forces) entire team of four staff journalists in the city, as well as two freelancers, [one](https://cpj.org/data/people/moamen-aliwa/) of whom was working for Al Jazeera.

They use the word _murdered_. Pretty unequivocal. And his name is still there even _after_ the recent purge.

There is no evidence he was a “terrorist.” There is no evidence that he was an active combatant. He was deliberately targeted and murdered. A warcrime.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> If we pretend that terrorists like al-Shariff were not terrorists, we can make all kinds of claims about the conflict. Doesn’t make them _true_.

The thing is: this goes both ways.

If we pretend journalists like al-Shariff were terrorists, we can make all kinds of claims about the conflict. Doesn’t make them _true_. Like the claim that the CPJ are lying. The claim that the IDF doesn’t target journalists. The evidence, even if we believe the 60% number, still supports the claim that the IDF deliberately targets journalists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6172 "2026-07-03T13:34:47Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …According to the IDF, they have a spreadsheet with a line item that says that many years ago he _may_ have been a soldier. We’ve seen a screenshot of the spreadsheet entry. I’m not convinced. Neither are organisations like the CPJ.

The CPJ, which has lied literally hundreds of times defending terrorists as “journalists”, is not convinced? Oh, no! Anyways…

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> They use the word _murdered_. Pretty unequivocal.

Yes, because they are lying propagandists whose goal is to convince the ignorant that Israel is an evil bloodthirsty and illegitimate entity. That’s why they ignore all the evidence that al-Shariff was a terrorist in order to use loaded language like ‘mUrDeReD’.

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> If we pretend journalists like al-Shariff were terrorists, we can make all kinds of claims about the conflict. Doesn’t make them _true_. Like the claim that the CPJ are lying.

The difference is that there is hard evidence showing al-Shariff was a terrorist. He appears in Hamas’ own documents.

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> The evidence, even if we believe the 60% number, still supports the claim that the IDF deliberately targets journalists.

There is exactly 0 evidenc that the IDF targets journalists. The fact that sometimes journalists die does not mean that they are deliberately targeted, and thw CPJ has shown exactly 0 evidence of deliberate targeting. There is quite literally infinitely more evidence that al-Shariff was a terrorist than that the IDF has ever deliberately targeted a journalist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6173 "2026-07-03T13:55:31Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The CPJ, which has lied literally hundreds of times defending terrorists as “journalists”, is not convinced? Oh, no! Anyways…

…when did they lie?

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Yes, because they are lying propagandists whose goal is to convince the ignorant that Israel is an evil bloodthirsty and illegitimate entity. That’s why they ignore all the evidence that al-Shariff was a terrorist in order to use loaded language like ‘mUrDeReD’.

So to be clear here: you are accusing The Committee to Protect Journalists, an American nonprofit that has been standing up for journalists since 1981, of being “lying propagandists”?

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The difference is that there is hard evidence showing al-Shariff was a terrorist.

You do understand the difference between a terrorist, a combatant, and an alleged combatant, right?

The evidence suggests he might have been a soldier many years ago. Just like how almost every single Israeli journalist has _also_ served. Does being a soldier make you a terrorist? Because in that case, every single Israeli journalist is _also_ a terrorist.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> There is exactly 0 evidenc that the IDF targets journalists.

> **[UN Human Rights Office condemns targeting journalists and attacks on hospitals...](https://www.un.org/unispal/document/un-human-rights-office-condemns-targeting-journalists-and-attacks-on-hospitals/)**
>
>   06 June 2025 UN Human Rights Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) condemns the Israeli military’s pattern of killings of journalists in Gaza, which remains the deadliest place in the world to be a journalist. In the latest attack on...

> **[Israel: Two years of killing journalists and controlling the narrative in Gaza...](https://www.ifj.org/media-centre/news/detail/category/press-releases/article/israel-two-years-of-killing-journalists-and-controlling-the-narrative-in-gaza)**
>
> In two years of war, over 223 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed in Gaza in the deadliest period in the history of journalism. The Israeli government’s systematic targeting of journalists is ongoing, exacerbated by the...

> **[Gaza: Israel publicly escalates slaughter of Palestinian journalists, amid...](https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/gaza-israel-publicly-escalates-slaughter-palestinian-journalists-amid-total-lack-intl-accountability-enar)**
>
> News and Press Release in Arabic on occupied Palestinian territory about Protection and Human Rights; published on 7 Apr 2025 by Euro-Med Monitor

> **[Client Challenge](https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/06/25/how-israel-targets-journalists-in-gaza-the-press-vest-now-puts-us-in-danger_6675653_4.html)**

[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403962257\_Commentary\_When\_Truth\_Is\_Targeted\_The\_Killing\_of\_Journalists\_and\_the\_Erasure\_of\_Memory\_in\_Palestine](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403962257_Commentary_When_Truth_Is_Targeted_The_Killing_of_Journalists_and_the_Erasure_of_Memory_in_Palestine)

> **[Amnesty International condemns the deliberate killings of Al-Jazeera...](https://www.amnesty.org.au/amnesty-condemns-the-deliberate-killings-of-al-jazeera-journalists-including-anas-al-sharif/)**
>
> Amnesty International Australia mourns the deaths of Al-Jazeera journalists killed by Israel in a targeted strike on their tent near al-Shifa Hospital in

> [@Babale](#):
>
> There is quite literally infinitely more evidence that al-Shariff was a terrorist than that the IDF has ever deliberately targeted a journalist.

I’ve just provided six cites. The IDF has a _single line item from a spreadsheet_ that _doesn’t even suggest he was a terrorist_. That isn’t “more evidence.” Let’s just start with the claim “he was a terrorist”: you’ve literally provided zero evidence of that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6174 "2026-07-03T13:57:50Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> The difference is that there is hard evidence showing al-Shariff was a terrorist. He appears in Hamas’ own documents.

Just once again for the record, this is not a factual statement. Unsupported IDF/Israeli Intel assertions are not facts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6175 "2026-07-03T14:04:02Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> The evidence suggests he might have been a soldier many years ago. Just like how almost every single Israeli journalist has _also_ served. Does being a soldier make you a terrorist?

Are you comparing a national army to a terrorist group like Hamas?

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> I’ve just provided six cites. The IDF has a _single line item from a spreadsheet_ that _doesn’t even suggest he was a terrorist_.

You linked six articles each of which has significantly less evidence than “a single line item from a spreadsheet”. They have conjecture and hearsay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6176 "2026-07-03T14:16:37Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Are you comparing a national army to a terrorist group like Hamas?

…I was asking you a question.

And the IDF are guilty of multiple atrocities and terror attacks. They don’t get a pass just because they are a “national army.”

> You linked six articles each of which has significantly less evidence than “a single line item from a spreadsheet”. They have conjecture and hearsay.

It’s a _spreadsheet_. Allegedly a Hamas spreadsheet. I’ve got zero reason to believe a word that comes out of the IDF. It hasn’t been independently verified.

However, I’m prepared to concede that what the spreadsheet suggests is that many years ago he may have served as a soldier, not a terrorist. And I think if you are going to condemn someone to death, (because that is what happened here), you need something more than something one can whip up on a computer in seconds.

There is zero evidence that he was a soldier OR a terrorist in 2023, 2024 or 2025. So he wasn’t a legitimate target. And there is more evidence that the IDF is deliberately targeting journalists than there is that al-Shariff was a terrorist. Over 200 journalists in circumstances where the journalist was the only target is pretty definitive evidence of a pattern.

You’ve literally provided zero evidence he was a terrorist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2026, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317/6177 "2026-07-03T14:17:55Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> However, I’m prepared to concede that what the spreadsheet suggests is that many years ago he may have served as a soldier, not a terrorist.

There is no such thing as a Hamas “soldier”. Hamas is a terrorist organization.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317.md?page=301)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/discussion-thread-for-the-hamas-attacks-israel-thread-october-2023/991317.md?page=303)
